Journals / Türk Patoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials

Pages
185–192
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Gleason score, localization and volume of the tumors are important for patient follow-up, treatment and prognosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men.
📊
Key Findings & Data:About 50 years ago, Dr.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Gleason score, localization and volume of the tumors are important for patient follow-up, treatment and prognosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and serum prostatespecific antigen represents a diagnostic triad for the detection of prostatic carcinoma. About 50 years ago, Dr. Donald Gleason created a gradingsystem for prostate cancer based on its histologic patterns. Currently, this system maintains its validity with various changes. New updates weremade in 2005 and 2014 by the International Society of Urological Pathology. The goal of biopsies is to determine the Gleason score and prognosisin prostatectomy material. The aim of this study was to determine the concordance of the Gleason score, tumor volume and tumor lateralitybetween prostate needle biopsy and prostatectomy materials.Material and Method: The study was performed with 112 patients who had biopsy and prostatectomy materials. The Gleason grades of thetumors have been evaluated with the new grading system. Tumor volumes were calculated by the number of positive blocks while tumor lateralitywas evaluated as unilateral or bilateral. Statistical analysis was performed on the obtained data.Results: Gleason score, tumor volume and tumor laterality discordance between needle biopsy and prostatectomy materials was found to bestatistically significant. However, the concordance increased as the Gleason score and tumor volume increased.Conclusion: Digital examination, serum prostate specific antigen value and needle biopsy together are very sensitive for a prostate adenocarcinomadiagnosis. The Gleason score, localization and volume of the tumors are important for patient follow-up, treatment and prognosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜNDAR, G., YELDİR, N., YILDIZ, E. (2022). Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials. Türk Patoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 185–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/640435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Epstein JI, Lotan TL. The lower urinary tract and male genital system. In: Kumar V, Abul KA, Aster JC, editors. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2015. 859-990
  2. Epstein JI. The prostate and seminal vesicles. In: Mills SE, Carter D, Greenson JK, Oberman HA, Reuter V, Stoler MH, editors. Sternberg’s diagnostic surgical pathology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2004. 2083-132
  3. Moch H, Humprey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. Tumours of the prostate. WHO classification tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2016. 136-83
  4. Rosai J. Male reproductive system. Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology. 10th ed. Sydney: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. 1287-398
  5. Neşe N. Prostate and seminal vesicle. In: Yörükoğlu K, Tuna B editors. Uropathology. 1st ed. Izmir: Congress Bookshop, Kanyılmaz Printing House; 2016. 319-473
  6. Cupp MR, Bostwick DG, Myers RP, Oesterling JE. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen can not reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis. J Urol. 1995;153:1543-8
  7. Brimo F, Vollmer RT, Corcos J, Kotar K, Begin LR, Humphrey PA, Bismar TA. Prognostic value of various morphometric measurements of tumour extent in prostate needle core tissue. Histopathology. 2008;53:177-83
  8. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committe. The 2005 international society of urologic pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1228-42
  9. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, John K, Humphrey PA; The Grading Committee. The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J SurgPathol. 2016;40:244-52
  10. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histologic grading and clinical staging. J Urol. 1974;111:58-64
  11. Marks RA, Lin H, Koch MO, Cheng L. Positive-block ratio in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:877-81
  12. Özdamar K. Biostatistics with SPSS. 4th ed. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi; 2001
  13. Prostate Cancer, Nutrition, and Dietary Supplements. PDQ integrative, alternative, and complementary therapi