AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightHowever, large resections should be used for PD-L1 evaluation whenever possible since even 1% positivity may affect the treatmentdecision
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Objective: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death. PD-L1 blockers have become a first-line option for advanced non-small celllung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Guidelines require the assessment of PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Although tissue samples arewidely used, cytologic samples could be an alternative. In this study, we compared cytologic samples with tissue samples for PD-L1 evaluationin NSCLC cases.Material and Method: Koç University Hospital, Department of Pathology Laboratory Information System was scanned for all PD-L1 testsperformed on NSCLC cases, either on tissue samples or cell blocks. The type of the biopsy/aspiration procedure, the tumor type, patientdemographics, and the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells were recorded. A total of 73 tissue samples and 49 cell blocks were found to beeligible for the study.Results: The PD-L1 positivity score was at least 1% in 44 of 73 samples of the tissue group and 19 of 49 samples of the cell block group. Tissuesamples showed significantly higher positivity compared to the cell blocks (p=0.020). Comparing the frequency of cases with ≥50% positivityshowed no statistically significant difference. A comparison of PD-L1 positivity rates of only the small biopsies and cell blocks also showed nosignificant difference.Conclusion: Although they harbor a limited number of tumor cells, cell blocks prepared from cytologic samples are good alternatives for PD-L1testing. However, large resections should be used for PD-L1 evaluation whenever possible since even 1% positivity may affect the treatmentdecision