SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 34

CAUSALITY AND COINTEGRATION IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS

KRİPTO PARA PİYASALARINDA NEDENSELLİK VE EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME

Yavuz GÜL
Pages
129–142
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate that there exists cointegration among cryptocurrencies in the long run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates the causality and cointegration relationships between seven major cryptocurrencies, namely Bitcoin (BTC), Binance Coin (BNB), Cardano (ADA), Dogecoin (DOGE), Ethereum (ETH), Polkadot (DOT) and Ripple (XRP), using Johansen Cointegration and Granger Causality tests over the period from August 21, 2020 to April 19, 2021.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results indicate that there exists cointegration among cryptocurrencies in the long run.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results might have some important implications for investors in terms of portfolio management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kripto Paralar · Eşbütünleşme · Nedensellik

Abstract

This paper investigates the causality and cointegration relationships between seven major cryptocurrencies, namely Bitcoin (BTC), Binance Coin (BNB), Cardano (ADA), Dogecoin (DOGE), Ethereum (ETH), Polkadot (DOT) and Ripple (XRP), using Johansen Cointegration and Granger Causality tests over the period from August 21, 2020 to April 19, 2021. Results indicate that there exists cointegration among cryptocurrencies in the long run. Findings also show that there is a bi-directional causal relationship between BNB and ETH. Additionally, BNB appears to be Granger cause of ADA, DOGE and DOT. On the other hand, analyses provide evidence of one-way causality running from XRP to both DOGE and DOT. These results might have some important implications for investors in terms of portfolio management.

Özet

Bu makalede, Johansen Eşbütünleşme ve Granger Nedensellik testleri kullanılarak Bitcoin (BTC), Binance Coin (BNB), Cardano (ADA), Dogecoin (DOGE), Ethereum (ETH), Polkadot (DOT) ve Ripple (XRP) olmak üzere yedi kripto paranın arasındaki nedensellik ve eşbütünleşme ilişkileri araştırılmaktadır. Çalışma dönemi 21 Ağustos 2020 – 19 Nisan 2021 tarihleri arasını kapsamaktadır. Sonuçlar, kripto paralar arasında uzun dönemde eşbütünleşme olduğunu işaret etmektedir. Bulgular ayrıca BNB ve ETH arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Bunlarla birlikte BNB’nin, ADA’nın, DOGE’nin ve DOT’un Granger nedeni olduğu görünmektedir. Diğer yandan analizler, XRP’den, hem DOGE’ye hem DOT’a doğru tek yönlü nedensellik bulunduğuna dair kanıtlar sunmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar yatırımcıların portföy yönetimi açısından bazı önemli çıkarımlar yapmasını sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜL, Y. (2022). CAUSALITY AND COINTEGRATION IN CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKETS. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 34, 129–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/639976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adebola, S.S., Gil-Alana, L.A. and Madigu, G. (2019). Gold Prices and Cryptocurrencies: Evidence of Convergence and Cointegration. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 523, 1227-1236.
  2. Aksoy, E., Teker, T., Mazak, M. and Kocabıyık, T. (2020). Kripto Paralar ve Fiyat İlişkileri Üzerine Bir Analiz: Toda-Yamamoto Nedensellik Analizi ile Bir İnceleme. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 37, 110-129. Bedowska-Sójka, B., Hinc, T. and Kliber, A. (2020). Volatility and Liquidity in Cryptocurrency Markets – The Causality Approach. 5th Wroclaw International Conference in Finance, 31-44,
  3. Wroclaw. Bilgin, C. and Şahbaz, A. (2009). Causality Relations between Growth and Export in Turkey. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 177-198.
  4. Büyükakın, F., Bozkurt, H. and Cengiz, V. (2009). Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarımın Faiz Kanalının Granger Nedensellik ve Toda-Yamamoto Yöntemleri ile Analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 101-118.
  5. Carpenter, A. (2016). Portfolio Diversification with Bitcoin. Journal of Undergraduate Research in Finance, 6(1), 1-27.
  6. Corelli, A. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and Exchange Rates: A Relationship and Causality Analysis. Risks, 6(4), 1-11.
  7. Dastgir, S., Demir, E., Downing, G., Gozgor, G. and Lau, C.K.M. (2019). The Causal Relationship Between Bitcoin Attention and Bitcoin Returns: Evidence from the Copula-based Granger Causality Test. Finance Research Letters, 28, 160-164.
  8. Dirican, C. and Canoz, I. (2017). The Cointegration Relationship Between Bitcoin Prices and Major World Stock Indices: An Analysis with ARDL Model Approach. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 4(4), 377-392.
  9. Elsayed, A.H., Gozgor, G. and Lau, C.K.M. (in press). Causality and Dynamic Spillovers among Cryptocurrencies and Currency Markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics. Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
  10. Feng, W., Wang, Y. and Zhang, Z. (2018). Can Cryptocurrencies be a Safe Haven: A Tail Risk Perspective Analysis. Applied Economics, 50(44), 4745-4762.
  11. Gangwal, S. (2016). Analyzing the Effects of Adding Bitcoin to Portfolio. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 10(10), 3519-3532.
  12. Gemici, E. and Polat, M. (in press). Causality-in-mean and Causality-in-variance among Bitcoin, Litecoin and Ehtereum. Studies in Economics and Finan