Journals / Türk Onkoloji Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Outcomes of Surgery and Craniospinal Radiotherapy for Adult Patients with Medulloblastoma

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Five-, 10-, and 15-yearoverall survival rates were 79%, 63%, and 63%, and 5-, 10- and 15-year progression-free survival rateswere 63%, 63%, and 63%, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVEThe aim of the present study was to evaluate treatment outcomes for adult patients with medulloblastomawho received craniospinal irradiation following surgery at Dokuz Eylül University Radiation OncologyDepartment.METHODSTwelve patients were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Median age was 31 years (range: 18–55 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Five-, 10-, and 15-yearoverall survival rates were 79%, 63%, and 63%, and 5-, 10- and 15-year progression-free survival rateswere 63%, 63%, and 63%, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVEThe aim of the present study was to evaluate treatment outcomes for adult patients with medulloblastomawho received craniospinal irradiation following surgery at Dokuz Eylül University Radiation OncologyDepartment.METHODSTwelve patients were evaluated retrospectively. Median age was 31 years (range: 18–55 years). Accordingto Chang staging system, 3 (25%) of the patients were T1, 2 (17%) were T2, 5 (42%) were T3, and 1 (8%)was T4; 1 patient could not be staged due to inadequate preoperative imaging. Tumor location, stage,presence of residual disease, duration between surgery and radiotherapy (RT), age, and sex were evaluatedas prognostic factors. Statistical analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier method and SPSS forWindows, Version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).RESULTSMedian dose was 36 Gy (range: 32–44 Gy) to craniospinal field and 54 Gy (range: 50–56 Gy) to primarytumor location. Median follow-up time was 62 months (range: 4–212 months). Five-, 10-, and 15-yearoverall survival rates were 79%, 63%, and 63%, and 5-, 10- and 15-year progression-free survival rateswere 63%, 63%, and 63%, respectively. No statistically significant prognostic factor was found for survivalrate. Three (25%) patients developed serious hematological toxicity during RT course. No grade 3or 4 late side effect was observed.CONCLUSIONDespite the limited number of cases, results are consistent with the literature. Evaluation of features ofthis rare disease requires studies with larger number of.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALICIKUŞ, Z. A., AKMAN, F., GÜZELÖZ, Z., ÇETINAYAK, O. (2022). Outcomes of Surgery and Craniospinal Radiotherapy for Adult Patients with Medulloblastoma. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/639268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Merchant TE. Central nervus system tumors in children. In: Leonard L. Gunderson, Joel E. Tepper editors. Gunderson &Tepper Clinical Radiation Oncology, 2nd edition. Philadelphia. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2007. p. 1576
  2. Carrie C, Lasset C, Blay JY, Négrier S, Bouffet E, Barbet N, et al. Medulloblastoma in adults: survival and prognostic factors. Radiother Oncol 1993;29(3):301– 7. 3. www.CBTRUS.org. Statistical report: Primary brain tumors in the United States, 1998-2002 Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States 2005. 4. www.cbtns.org/reports/reports.html June 14, 2006
  3. Malika LS, Donahue BR, Vogelbaum MA, Tome WA, Gilbert MR, Mehta MP. Primary intracranial neoplasms. In: Halperin EC, Brady LW, Perez CA, editors. Perez and Brady’s Principles and Practise of Radiation Oncology, 5 th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 741
  4. Lai SF, Wang CW, Chen YH, Lan KH, Cheng JC, Cheng AL, et al. Medulloblastoma in adults. Treatment outcome, relapse patterns, and prognostic factors. Strahlenther Onkol 2012;188(10):878–86
  5. Chang CH, Housepian EM, Herbert C Jr. An operative staging system and a megavoltage radiotherapeutic technic for cerebellar medulloblastomas. Radiology 1969;93(6):1351–9
  6. Winger MJ, Macdonald DR, Cairncross JG: Supratentorial anaplastic gliomas in adults: The prognostic importance of extent of resection and prior low-grade glioma. J Neurosurg 1989;71(4):487–93
  7. Freeman CR, Freeman JP, Taylor RE. Central Nervus System Tumors in Children. In: Halperin EC, Brady LW, Perez CA, editors. Perez and Brady’s Principles and Practise of Radiation Oncology, 5 th edition. Philadelphia: p. 1836–8. 10.Packer RJ, Rorke-Adams LB, Lau CC, et al. Embryonal and pineal region tumors. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, editor Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2011. p. 772–808. 11.Miralbell R, Fitzgerald TJ, Laurie F, Kessel S, Glicksman A, Friedman HS, et al.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Radiotherapy in pediatric medulloblastoma: quality assessment of Pediatric Oncology Group Trial 9031. Phys 2006;64(5):1325–30. 12.Kusters JM, Louwe RJ, van Kollenburg PG, KunzeBusch MC, Gidding CE, van Lindert EJ, et al. Optimal normal tissue sparing in craniospinal axis irradiation using IMRT with daily intrafractionally modulated junction(s). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81(5):1405–14. 13.Lee YK, Brooks CJ, Bedford JL, Warrington AP, Saran FH. Development and evaluation