Journals / Türk Onkoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Does the Radiotherapy Technique Have an Impact on the Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer?

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The 2-,5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 76%, 62%, and 47%, respectively, and the progression-freesurvival rates were 68%, 62%, and 58%, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVEConcurrent chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with locally advanced cervicalcancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We evaluated the treatment results and prognostic factors in patients treated with chemoradiation.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 150 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treatedwith curative chemoradiotherapy between 1999 and 2014 at our hospital.RESULTSThe median follow-up period was 37.5 months (range: 5.6–186 months).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The 2-,5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 76%, 62%, and 47%, respectively, and the progression-freesurvival rates were 68%, 62%, and 58%, respectively.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVEConcurrent chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with locally advanced cervicalcancer. We evaluated the treatment results and prognostic factors in patients treated with chemoradiation.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 150 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treatedwith curative chemoradiotherapy between 1999 and 2014 at our hospital.RESULTSThe median follow-up period was 37.5 months (range: 5.6–186 months). All patients received both externalbeam radiation therapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy. EBRT was delivered with conventional2-dimensional radiotherapy or 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Eighty-sevenpercent of patients received cisplatinum-based chemotherapy during EBRT. Total or nearly total remissionwas achieved in 72% of patients. With a median follow-up duration of 37.5 months, 29% of patientsdied, 13% of patients had local-regional recurrence, and 25% of patients had distant metastasis. The 2-,5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 76%, 62%, and 47%, respectively, and the progression-freesurvival rates were 68%, 62%, and 58%, respectively. We evaluated prognostic factors for overall survivaland progression-free survival. The most important prognostic factor was the radiotherapy technique. Thesurvival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences were assessed using thelog-rank test; a p-value

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, G. M., KORCUM, A. F., GENÇ, M., YAVUZ, M. N., BÜKÜLMEZ, T., ÖZDEMİR, B. Ş. (2022). Does the Radiotherapy Technique Have an Impact on the Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer?. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/639263

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65(2):87–108.
  2. Christopherson WM, Parker JE. Relation of cervical cancer to early marriage and childbearing. N Engl J Med 1965;273:235–9. Keighley E. Carcinoma of the cervix among prostitutes in a women’s prison. Br J Vener Dis 1968;44(3):254–5.
  3. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 2002;55(4):244–65.
  4. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340(15):1144–53. Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2000;18(8):1606–13.
  5. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, Grigsby PW, Levenback C, Stevens RE, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340(15):1137–43.
  6. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, Muderspach LI, Chafe WE, Suggs CL 3rd, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340(15):1154–61.
  7. Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, Malfetano JH, Hannigan EV, Fowler WC Jr, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1999;17(5):1339– 48. Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF, Symonds P, Fresco L, Collingwood M, et al. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet 2001;358(9284):781–6. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC). Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(1):CD008285. Atahan IL, Onal C, Ozyar E, Yiliz F, Selek U, Kose F. Long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients with cervical carcinoma: a retrospective st