✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Patients aged ≥40 yearshad a poorer overall survival (OS) than those aged
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVETo date, several methods have been identified for predicting the prognostic subgroups of grade II gliomas; however, these methods have some limitations in predicting survival.
📊
Key Findings & Data:So, we aimed to determinethe predictive role of Ki-67 labeling index (LI) on survival.METHODSBetween 1995 and 2014, patients with grade II gliomas were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients aged ≥40 yearshad a poorer overall survival (OS) than those aged
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
OBJECTIVETo date, several methods have been identified for predicting the prognostic subgroups of grade II gliomas; however, these methods have some limitations in predicting survival. So, we aimed to determinethe predictive role of Ki-67 labeling index (LI) on survival.METHODSBetween 1995 and 2014, patients with grade II gliomas were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received radiotherapy (RT).RESULTSThis study included 78 patients with median 44 (range, 6–137) months follow-up. Patients aged ≥40 yearshad a poorer overall survival (OS) than those aged
🔖
Cite This Article
AKTAN, M., KANYILMAZ, G., KARAHACIOĞLU, E., ÖNDER, H., BORA, H., KOÇ, M., ERKAL, H. Ş., ERKAL, E. Y. (2022). Prognostic Importance of Ki-67 Labeling Index in Grade II Glial Tumors. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 48–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/639245