Journals / Türk Onkoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Effects of TiLOOP Bra Mesh on Radiotherapy Dose Distribution

Pages
174–178
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, there were no metallic artifactson computed tomography image.CONCLUSIONTherefore, the quality of the computed tomography image was not affected by the TiLOOP Bra mesh,and it was not necessary to correct the artifact and change the HU (Hounsfield Unit) value in TPS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVEThe TiLOOP Bra mesh is a breast-implant-surrounding material that supports the pectoralis muscle andkeeps the implant stable in the subpectoral area during breast reconstruction surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimedto investigate the dosimetric effect of TiLOOP Bra mesh on dose distribution of radiotherapy in patientsrequiring postoperative treatment.METHODSThe metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) and nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) were used for dose measurements at different depths in solid phantoms.The measurements were performed above and below the mesh, and at 1 cm deep to the mesh for 6 MVphoton energy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, there were no metallic artifactson computed tomography image.CONCLUSIONTherefore, the quality of the computed tomography image was not affected by the TiLOOP Bra mesh,and it was not necessary to correct the artifact and change the HU (Hounsfield Unit) value in TPS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVEThe TiLOOP Bra mesh is a breast-implant-surrounding material that supports the pectoralis muscle andkeeps the implant stable in the subpectoral area during breast reconstruction surgery. This study aimedto investigate the dosimetric effect of TiLOOP Bra mesh on dose distribution of radiotherapy in patientsrequiring postoperative treatment.METHODSThe metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) and nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) were used for dose measurements at different depths in solid phantoms.The measurements were performed above and below the mesh, and at 1 cm deep to the mesh for 6 MVphoton energy. The relative dose differences were obtained by measuring doses using the dosimeters andcomparing the results with calculated values in Eclipse TPS (Treatment Planning System). The relativedose differences between the cases where the mesh had been present and where the mesh had beenremoved were evaluated.RESULTSThe results were found less than 1%. The findings showed that the TiLOOP Bra mesh used in breastsurgery did not affect the dose calculations for radiotherapy. In addition, there were no metallic artifactson computed tomography image.CONCLUSIONTherefore, the quality of the computed tomography image was not affected by the TiLOOP Bra mesh,and it was not necessary to correct the artifact and change the HU (Hounsfield Unit) value in TPS.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNÇ, S. Ç., TUNCER, S., TEKİN, A., ERPOLAT, Ö. P. (2022). Effects of TiLOOP Bra Mesh on Radiotherapy Dose Distribution. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 174–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/639237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K, Dieterich H, Blohmer J, Faridi A, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132(1):8–19
  2. AAPM. Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams, Report No. AAPM-85. AAPM Task Group No.65 of the Radiation Therapy Committee. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing; 2004
  3. Catlı S, Tanır G. Experimental and Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse treatment planning system for effects on dose distribution of the hip prostheses. Med Dosim 2013; 38(3):332–6
  4. Çatli S. High-density dental implants and radiotherapy planning: Evaluation of effects on dose distribution using pencil beam convolution algorithm and Monte Carlo method. Journal of Applied and Clinical Medical Physics 2015;16(5):46–52
  5. Lin SY, Chu TC, Lin JP, Liu MT. The effect of a metal hip prosthesis on the radiation dose in therapeutic photon beam irradiations. Appl Radiat Isot 2002;57(1):17–23
  6. Biggs PJ, Russell MD. Effect of femoral head prosthesis on megavoltage beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988;14(3):581–6
  7. Carolan M, Dao P, Fox C, Metcalfe P. Effect of hip prostheses on radiotherapy dose. Australas Radiol 2000;44(3):290–5
  8. Mesbahi A, Nejad FS. Dose attenuation effect of hip prostheses in a 9-MV photon beam: commercial treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo calculations. Radiat Med 2007; 25(10):529–35
  9. Shimozato T, Yasui K, Kawanami R, Habara K, Aoyama Y, Tabushi K, et al. Dose distribution near thin titanium plate for skull fixation irradiated by a 4-MV photon beam. J Med Phys 2010;35(2):81–7. 10.Camacho C, Pujades MC, Perez-Calatayud J, Lliso F, Carmona V, Tormo A, et al. Impact of the Tiloop Bra mesh in CT images and dose delivery in breast radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2012;13(2):3667. 11.Cho S, Goh Y, Kim C, Kim H, Jeong JH, Lim YK, et al. Dosimetric Impact of Ti Mesh on Proton Beam Therapy. Progress in Medical Physics 2017; 28(4):144–8. 12.Patone H, Barker J, Roberge D. Effects of neurosurgical titanium mesh on radiation dose Med Dosim 2006; 31(4): 298–301. 13.Rakowski JT, Chin K, Mittal S. Effects of titanium mesh implant on dosimetry during gamma knife radiosurgery J Appl Clin Med Phys 2012;13(5):54–61. 14.ICRU Report 24. Determination of Absorbed Dose in Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy. ICRU;1976. 15.Das IJ, Kahn FM. Backscatter dose perturbation at