Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2015 / Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 2015

A Dynamic Performance Management Model

Dinamik Bir Performans Yönetim Modeli

Pages
153–168
Publication Date
2015-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Growth in learning data, specify the level of knowledge and experience level, the tendency, strong and developable aspects of the evaluated personnel.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to develop an organizational performance management model in a dynamic structure, formed in the scientific methods gathering together.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All the criteria, expected to be in the performance evaluation form, create the performance criteria pool (shown as Ph).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Growth in learning data, specify the level of knowledge and experience level, the tendency, strong and developable aspects of the evaluated personnel.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article aims to develop an organizational performance management model in a dynamic structure, formed in the scientific methods gathering together. All the criteria, expected to be in the performance evaluation form, create the performance criteria pool (shown as Ph). This pool has a dynamic structure containing criteria which are decided to take into consideration by the manager. Performance criteria pool getst together in main group names (shown as AG) and for each AG, half of the total score is taken by using two methods, of which significance degrees are the highest ones in the result of AHP. The cumulative score shows the "Growth in Learning" level. Growth in learning data, specify the level of knowledge and experience level, the tendency, strong and developable aspects of the evaluated personnel.

Özet

Bu makale, çalışanların beklentileriyle, bilimsel metotların bütünlüğünde oluşan, dinamik yapıda bir organizasyonel performans yönetim modelinin geliştirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Performans değerlendirme formunda yer alması beklenen tüm kriterler, performans kriter havuzunu (Ph) oluşturmakla birlikte, yöneticinin olması gerektiğini düşündüğü başka kriterler de varsa havuza ekleyebileceği esneklik sayesinde sistem dinamizmi korunmaktadır. Performans kriter havuzu, ana grup isimleri (AG) altında gruplanır ve her AG için Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi kullanılmasıyla önem derecesi en yüksek çıkan yöntem sonucundaki puan alınır. Elde edilen bu puan; öğrenmede büyüme puanıdır. Öğrenmede büyüme verileri, performansı değerlendirilen çalışanın zamanla kazandığı bilgi ve tecrübe seviyesini, eğilimlerini, güçlü ve gelişime açık yönlerini belirtir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKESER, B., UZUN, A. (2015). A Dynamic Performance Management Model. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 2015, 153–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/63622

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Barnes, Jeff M. - Coulton, Lane – Dickinson, T. – Dransfield, S. – Field, J. – Fisher, N. – Saunders, I. – Shaw, D. (1998), A New Approach to Performance Measurement For Small and Medium Enterprises. Cambridge, Proceedings of the Performance Measurement – Theory and Practice Conference, Cambridge, 14–17
  2. July. U.K. Bititci, Umit - Carrie, Allan - Mcdevitt Liam (1997), “Integrated Performance Measurement Systems: A Development Guide”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(5), 522-534.
  3. Bowlby, Raynna (2012), “Living the Future: Organizational Performance Assessment”, Journal of Library Administration, 52, 626–652.
  4. Costello, Sheila J. (1994), Effective Performance Management. McGraw Hill, New York. Cornelius, Nelarine (2001), Human Resource Management (2nd Ed.). Thomson Learning Yayınları,
  5. New York. Cross, Kelvin F. - Lynch, Richard L. (1991), Measure Up- The Essential Guide to Mesuring Business Performance. Londra, Mandarin. Dadzie, Charlene A. - Winston, Evelyn. M. - Dadzie, Kofi Q. (2012), “Organizational Culture, Competitive Strategy, and Performance in Ghana Charlene”, Journal of African Business, 13(3), 172-182.
  6. Fashami, Vajiheh A. - Moghadam, Mohammad M. (2013), “Studying the Relation Between Organizational Mission as an Encouraging Factor and Performance Improvement of Human Resources”, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(4), 608-612.
  7. Felek, Sevi - Yuluğkural, Yıldız - Aladağ, Zerrin (2007), “Mobil İletişim Sektöründe Pazar Paylaşımının Tahmininde AHP ve ANP Yöntemlerinin Kıyaslaması”, Makine Mühendisleri Odası Endüstri Mühendisleri Dergisi, 18(1), 6-22.
  8. Franco-Santos, Rita M. (2007), “Towards A Definition of A Business Performance Measurement System”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(8), 784-801.
  9. Garengo, Patrizia - Biazzo, S., ve Bititci, Umit S. (2005), “Performans Measurement Systems in SMEs: A Review for a Research Agenda”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(1), 25-47.
  10. Ghalayini, Alaa M. - Noble, James S. (1997), “The Changing Basis of Performance Measurement”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(8), 63-80.
  11. Gyula, Laszlo F. (2013), “Analysis of the impact of the supply chain performance on the overall Organizational performance”, Annals of the university of Oradea, Economic Science, 1, 1505-1510.
  12. İnsan Kaynakları ve Yönetim Dergisi (1999), Birinci Performans Değerleme Yönetimi Zirvesi 17-18 Kasım 1998,
  13. İstanbul.
  14. Kaplan, Robert S.