Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Modeling of Energy Consumption Forecast with Economic Indicators Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm: An Application in Turkey between 1979 and 2050

Pages
59–78
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study determined that the statistical performance criteria of PSO models were more successful than the statistical performance criteria of GA models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) are the most important optimization techniques among various modern heuristic optimization techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aims to forecast the energy consumption in Turkey until the year 2050 using PSO and GA models.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study determined that the statistical performance criteria of PSO models were more successful than the statistical performance criteria of GA models.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2050 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Particle swarm optimization · genetic algorithm · energy consumption

Özet

Öz Particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) are the most important optimization techniques among various modern heuristic optimization techniques. The study aims to forecast the energy consumption in Turkey until the year 2050 using PSO and GA models. The annual data provided by the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, International Energy Agency (IEA), OECD, Turkish Statistical Institute were used in the study. PSO and GA energy demand forecasting models are developed using population, import, export and gross domestic product (GDP). All models are proposed in linear and quadratic forms. Turkey's energy consumption is projected according to four different scenarios. According the analysis results, the study found for the PSO analysis theR^2 values in the linear model was 91.72%, in the quadratic model was 94.06% at the same time for the GA analysis R^2 values in the linear model was 91.71%, in the quadratic model was 93.97%. Additionally, the mean absolute percent error rates were 11.58% for PSO and 11.69% for GA in the quadratic model. According to Lewis, these values showed that models could be used for energy consumption estimation purposes. The study determined that the statistical performance criteria of PSO models were more successful than the statistical performance criteria of GA models.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAKUT, E., ÖZKAN, E. (2020). Modeling of Energy Consumption Forecast with Economic Indicators Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm: An Application in Turkey between 1979 and 2050. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 59–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/63483

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alireza, A. L. F. I. (2011). PSO with adaptive mutation and inertia weight and its application in parameter estimation of dynamic systems. Acta Automatica Sinica, 37(5), 541-549.
  2. Assareh, E., Behrang, M. A., & Ghanbarzdeh, A. (2012). Forecasting energy demand in Iran using genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) methods. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 7(4), 411-422.
  3. Avami, A., & Boroushaki, M. (2011). Energy consumption forecasting of Iran using recurrent neural networks. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 6(4), 339-347.
  4. Baluja, S. (1994), Population-based incremental learning: A method for integrating genetic search based function optimization and competitive learning, Tech. Rep. No. CMU-CS-94-163,
  5. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Barak, S., & Sadegh, S. S. (2016). Forecasting energy consumption using ensemble ARIMA–ANFIS hybrid algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 82, 92-104.
  6. Behrang, M. A., Assareh, E., Assari, M. R., & Ghanbarzadeh, A. (2011). Total energy demand estimation in Iran using bees algorithm. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 6(3), 294-303.
  7. Bodenhofer, U. (2003). Genetic algorithms: theory and applications.In: Lecture notes, Fuzzy Logic Laboratorium Linz-Hagenberg, Winter. Boğar, E. & Boğar, Z. Ö. (2017). Türkiye Net Elektrik Enerjisi Tüketiminin Parçacık Sürü Optimizasyonu Tabanlı Modellenmesi. Akademia Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3), 40-47.
  8. Cao, Z., Yuan, P., & Ma, Y. B. (2014). Energy Demand Forecasting Based on Economy-related Factors in China. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(2), 214-219.
  9. Ceylan, H., & Ozturk, H. K. (2004). Estimating energy demand of Turkey based on economic indicators using genetic algorithm approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(15), 2525-2537.
  10. Ceylan, H., Ozturk, H. K., Hepbasli, A., & Utlu, Z. (2005). Estimating energy and exergy production and consumption values using three different genetic algorithm approaches. Energy Sources, Part 2: Application and scenarios. 27(7), 629-639.
  11. Clerc, M. (2010). Particle swarm optimization (Vol. 93). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Çolak, S. (2010). Genetik algoritmalar yardımı ile gezgin satıcı probleminin çözümü üzerine bir uygulama. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(3), 423-438.
  12. Coley, D. A. (1999). An introduction to genetic algorithms for scientists and engineers. Singap