SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

Functional and Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent an Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis

İleal Poş-anal Anastomoz Yapılan Hastaların Fonksiyonel ve Klinik Sonuçları

Hasan Bostancı
Osman Yüksel
Kürşat Dikmen
Hüseyin Gobut
Aydın Yavuz
Ömer Kuba
Saygın Altıner
Pages
330–335
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data collected included demographic characteristics, surgical indications, operation types, histopathological diagnosis, early (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the characteristics, early and late complications, outcomes, quality of life, and procedure-related problems in patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy performed with the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Twenty-two of the 26 patients who underwent IPAA from 2007 to 2019 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data collected included demographic characteristics, surgical indications, operation types, histopathological diagnosis, early (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the characteristics, early and late complications, outcomes, quality of life, and procedure-related problems in patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy performed with the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) approach. Method: Twenty-two of the 26 patients who underwent IPAA from 2007 to 2019 were included. Data collected included demographic characteristics, surgical indications, operation types, histopathological diagnosis, early (

Özet

Amaç: Amacımız kliniğimizde ileal poş-anal anastomoz (İPAA) yapılan hastaların özelliklerini, erken ve geç komplikasyonlarını, hastaların hayat kalitesi gibi İPAA sonrası gelişebilecek problemler ve sonuçları değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Kliniğinimizde 2007 ile 2019 yılları arasında İPAA yapılan 26 hastanın 22’si çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalara ait demografik özellikler, cerrahi endikasyonlar, operasyon tipi, patolojik tanı gibi sonuçları, erken (

🔖

Cite This Article

Bostancı, H., Yüksel, O., Dikmen, K., Gobut, H., Yavuz, A., Kuba, Ö., Altıner, S. (2022). Functional and Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent an Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 330–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/634511

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ozdemir Y, Kiran RP, Erem HH, Aytac E, Gorgun E, Magnuson D, Remzi FH. Functional outcomes and complications after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis in the pediatric population. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:328-335. Griffiths AM. Inflammatory bowel disease. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif) 1998;14:788-791.
  2. Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert L, Albertsen H, Joslyn G, Stevens J, Spirip L, Robertson M. Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 1991;66:589-600. Bussey H, editor Familial polyposis coli: family studies, histopathology, differential diagnosis, and results of treatment 1975.
  3. Fazio VW, O’Riordain MG, Lavery IC, Church JM, Lau P, Strong SA, Hull T. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg 1999;230:575-584; discussion 84-86.
  4. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M, Matsuo S, Sawai S, Yaegashi K, Hirayama R. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:459-466.
  5. Simillis C, Afxentiou T, Pellino G, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Faiz O, Tekkis P. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing adverse events and functional outcomes of different pouch designs after restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 2018;20:664-675. Alexander F. Complications of ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2007;16:200-204.
  6. Efron JE, Uriburu JP, Wexner SD, Pikarsky A, Hamel C, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ. Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis in Obese Patients. Obes Surg 2001;11:246-251.
  7. Kiran RP, Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Church JM, Strong SA, Hull TL. Complications and functional results after ileoanal pouch formation in obese patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:668-674.
  8. Sup SU, Sik YC, Dong KD, Nam YS, Cheon KJ. Risk Factors of Pouch Failure after a Restorative Proctocolectomy. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2008;24:252-259. Øresland T, Bemelman WA, Sampietro GM, Spinelli A, Windsor A, Ferrante M, Marteau P, Zmora O, Kotze PG, Espin-Basany E, Tiret E, Sica G, Panis Y, Faerden AE, Biancone L, Angriman I, Serclova Z, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Gionchetti P, Stassen L, Warusavitarne J, Adamina M, Dignass A, Eliakim R, Magro F, D›Hoore A. European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohn’s Ccolitis 2015;9:4-25.
  9. Remzi FH, Lavryk OA, Ashburn JH, Hull TL, Lavery IC, Dietz DW, Kessler H, Church JM. Restorative proctocolectom