Journals / Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted and Conventional MR Imaging in Staging of Rectal Cancer

Pages
191–197
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Overall, the diagnostic accuracy and Kappa value of T2W-MRI for T staging were 62.8% and 0.266, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in tumor/node (T/N) staging of rectal cancer and impact of MRI in clinical decision-making.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: This retrospective study included 43 patients with rectal cancer who were admitted to our institution between January 2019 and December 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Overall, the diagnostic accuracy and Kappa value of T2W-MRI for T staging were 62.8% and 0.266, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in tumor/node (T/N) staging of rectal cancer and impact of MRI in clinical decision-making. Method: This retrospective study included 43 patients with rectal cancer who were admitted to our institution between January 2019 and December 2020. MRI was performed within 2 weeks before surgery. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was assessed using the postoperative histopathologic results as a reference. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Kappa values were determined. The impact of preoperative MRI for appropriate treatment decision-making was also assessed. Results: Overall, the diagnostic accuracy and Kappa value of T2W-MRI for T staging were 62.8% and 0.266, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy and Kappa value of combined use of T2W and DWI for T staging were 65.1% and 0.251 and 41.9% and 0.011 for N staging, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for treatment decision-making was 72.5% and 74.5% for T2W and T2W+DWI, respectively. Conclusion: In rectal cancer, T2W-MRI enables a highly accurate preoperative assessment for the T stage but has moderate accuracy for the N stage.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORUN, M., SOYDAN, L., CANPOLAT, K., ÖNER, T., ÖZEN, H., KINA, U., SUBAŞI, İ. E. (2022). Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted and Conventional MR Imaging in Staging of Rectal Cancer. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 191–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/634506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-249
  2. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population- based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:93-99
  3. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Rectal Cancer. NCCN 2021 Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/ pdf/rectal.pdf
  4. Mo S, Dai W, Xiang W, Huang B, Li Y, Feng Y, Li Q, Cai G. Survival contradiction between stage iia and stage iiia rectal cancer: a retrospective study. J Cancer 2018;9:1466-1475
  5. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Cederquist L, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK, Cohen S, Cooper HS, Deming D, Engstrom PF, Grem JL, Grothey A, Hochster HS, Hoffe S, Hunt S, Kamel A, Kirilcuk N, Krishnamurthi S, Messersmith WA, Meyerhardt J, Mulcahy MF, Murphy JD, Nurkin S, Saltz L, Sharma S, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous CT, Stoffel EM, Stotsky- Himelfarb E, Willett CG, Wuthrick E, Gregory KM, Gurski L, Freedman- Cass DA. Rectal cancer, version 2.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;16:874-901
  6. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis. Radiology 2004;232:773-783
  7. Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, Beyene J, Victor JC, Schmocker S, Brown G, Mcleod R, Kennedy E. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:2212-2223
  8. Park IJ, You YN, Agarwal A, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Eng C, Feig BW, Das P, Krishnan S, Crane CH, Hu CY, Chang GJ. Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1770-1776
  9. Das P, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Feig BW, Chang GJ, Wolff RA, Eng C, Krishnan S, Janjan NA, Crane CH. Predictors of tumor response and downstaging in patients who receive preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Cancer 2007;109:1750-1755
  10. Videhult P,