Journals / Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Novel Sphincter-preserving Therapies for Recurrent Anal Fistulas

Tekrarlayan Anal Fistüller için Yeni Sfinkter Koruyucu Tedaviler

Pages
156–159
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Preliminary results of PRP application in the patients with recurrent, crypto-glandular anal fistulas showed a higher rate of fistulas closure compared to the treatment with PDP

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: There is still a need for more effective methods of treatment for the patients with recurrent, crypto-glandular anal fistulas due to a high rate of recurrences with threatening risk of fecal incontinence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to compare the rate of fistula healing after application of either platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or porcine-derived paste (PDP).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Preliminary results of PRP application in the patients with recurrent, crypto-glandular anal fistulas showed a higher rate of fistulas closure compared to the treatment with PDP
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: There is still a need for more effective methods of treatment for the patients with recurrent, crypto-glandular anal fistulas due to a high rate of recurrences with threatening risk of fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of fistula healing after application of either platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or porcine-derived paste (PDP). Method: Medical records of 50 patients with anal fistulas were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups. Group I, treated with PRP, consisted of 25 patients, whereas the group II, supplied with PDP consisted also of 25 patients. Fistula closure evaluated clinically was the primary endpoint of the study. Results: Closure of anal fistulas was achieved in 16 (64%) patients from the group I, and in 9 (36%) from the group II and that difference was statistically significant (p=0.048). There was no significant difference between both groups regarding demographic characteristics except for higher mean age of the patients within the group I (p=0.010). Conclusion: Preliminary results of PRP application in the patients with recurrent, crypto-glandular anal fistulas showed a higher rate of fistulas closure compared to the treatment with PDP

Özet

Amaç: Fekal inkontinans riski ile birlikte yüksek nüks oranları nedeniyle tekrarlayan, kripto-glandüler anal fistülü olan hastalarda daha etkili tedavi yöntemlerine hala ihtiyaç vardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, plateletten zengin plazma (PZP) veya domuzdan elde edilen macun (DEM) uygulamasından sonra fistül iyileşme oranını karşılaştırmaktı. Yöntem: Anal fistülü olan 50 hastanın tıbbi kayıtları geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı. PZP ile tedavi edilen Grup 1 ve DEM ile tedavi edilen grup 2 25’er hastadan oluşuyordu. Klinik olarak değerlendirilen fistül kapanması çalışmanın birincil sonlanım noktasıydı. Bulgular: Grup 1’den 16 (%64), grup 2’den 9 (%36) hastada anal fistül kapatıldı ve bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p=0,048). Grup 1’deki hastaların yaş ortalamalarının yüksek olması dışında her iki grup arasında demografik özellikler açısından anlamlı fark yoktu (p=0,010). Sonuç: Tekrarlayan, kripto-glandüler anal fistülü olan hastalarda PZP uygulamasının ilk sonuçlarına göre, DEM ile tedaviye kıyasla daha yüksek oranda fistül kapanması sağlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hermann, J., Cwaliński, J., Banasiewicz, T., Kołodziejczak, B. (2022). Novel Sphincter-preserving Therapies for Recurrent Anal Fistulas. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 156–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/634484

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Mei Z, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Liu P, Ge M, Du P, Yang W, He Y. Risk factors for recurrence after anal fistula surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2019;69:153-164
  2. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976;63:1-12
  3. Göttgens KWA, Smeets RR, Stassen LPS, Beets G, Breukink SO. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical interventions for high cryptoglandular perianal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015;30:583-593
  4. Mussano F, Genova T, Munaron L, Petrillo S, Erovigni F, Carossa S. Cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor profile of platelet-rich plasma. Platelets 2016;27:467-471
  5. Greco KV, Francis L, Somasundaram M, Greco G, English NR, Roether JA, Boccaccini AR, Sibbons P, Ansari T. Characterisation of porcine dermis scaffolds decellularised using a novel non-enzymatic method for biomedical applications. J Biomater Appl 2015;30:239-253
  6. Karanikas I, Koutserimpas C, Siaperas P, Skarpas A, Karoubalis J, Velimezis G. Transrectal ultrasonography of perianal fistulas: a single center experience from a surgeon’s point of view. G Chir 2018;39:258-260
  7. Norderval S, Rydningen MB, Falk RS, Arvid Stordahl A, Johannessen HH. Strong agreement between interview-obtained and self-administered Wexner and St. Mark’s scores using a single questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:2101-2108
  8. Lin H, Jin Z, Zhu Y, Diao M, Hu W.Anal fistula plug vs rectal advancement flap for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with long-term follow-up. Colorectal Dis 2019;21:502-515
  9. Emile SH, Khan SM, Adejumo A, Koroye O. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) in treatment of anal fistula: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of the predictors of failure. Surgery 2020;167:484-492
  10. Garg P, Singh P. Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) in Cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano: a systematic review and proportional meta- analysis. Int J Surg 2017;46:85-91
  11. Hermann J, Banasiewicz T, Ko łodziejczak B. Role of vacuum-assisted closure in the management of crohn’s anal fistulas. Adv Skin Wound Care 2019;32:35-40
  12. Sugrue J, Mantilla N, Abcarian A, Kochar K, Marecik S, Chaudhry V, Mellgren A, Nordenstam J. Sphincter-sparing anal fistula repair: are we getting Better? Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60: 1071-1077
  13. Jayne DG, Scholefield J, Tolan D, Gray R, Edlin R, Hulme CT, Sutton AJ, Handley K, Hewitt CA, Kaur M, Magill L. Anal