Journals / Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Colonoscopy Results of Turkish and Syrian Patients, Frequency of Incomplete Colonoscopy and Causes of Incomplete Colonoscopy

Türk ve Suriyeli Hastaların Kolonoskopi Sonuçları, İnkomplet Kolonoskopi Sıklığı ve İnkomplet Kolonoskopi Nedenlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
230–238
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was observed that the male gender, incomplete colonoscopy rate, insufficient bowel cleansing rate, and patients with Boston bowel cleansing score of zero and one were higher in the Syrian patient group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Colonoscopy is a frequently used procedure for the diagnosis of the colorectal diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics of Turkish and Syrian patients who had undergone colonoscopy in our hospital between August 2017 and March 2020 were compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was observed that the male gender, incomplete colonoscopy rate, insufficient bowel cleansing rate, and patients with Boston bowel cleansing score of zero and one were higher in the Syrian patient group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Colonoscopy is a frequently used procedure for the diagnosis of the colorectal diseases. In this study, we aimed to present demographic, endoscopic, and histopathological characteristics, the frequency of incomplete colonoscopy, and causes of incomplete colonoscopy of Turkish and Syrian patients who had undergone colonoscopy in our hospital. Method: The demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics of Turkish and Syrian patients who had undergone colonoscopy in our hospital between August 2017 and March 2020 were compared. Results: A total of 2,285 patients were included in the study, of which 1,175 (51.4%) were female, 1,110 (48.6%) were male, and the mean age was 46.30±15.33 years. The rate of incomplete colonoscopy was 18.3%. It was observed that the male gender, incomplete colonoscopy rate, insufficient bowel cleansing rate, and patients with Boston bowel cleansing score of zero and one were higher in the Syrian patient group (p

Özet

Amaç: Kolonoskopi kolorektal hastalıkların tanısında sıklıkla kullanılan bir işlemdir. Bu çalışmamızda endoskopi ünitemizde kolonoskopi yapılan Türk ve Suriyeli hastaların demografik, endoskopik ve histopatolojik özelliklerini, inkomplet kolonoskopi sıklığını ve inkomplet kolonoskopi nedenlerini sunmayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Ağustos 2017-Mart 2020 tarihleri arasında hastanemizde kolonoskopi yapılan Türk ve Suriyeli hastaların demografik, klinik ve histopatolojik özellikleri karşılaştırıldı. İnkomplet kolonoskopi nedenleri ve inkomplet kolonoskopiye etki eden faktörler incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 2.285 hastanın 1.175’i (%51,4) kadın, 1.110’u (%48,6) erkek olup, yaş ortalaması 46,30±15,33 idi. İnkomplet kolonoskopi oranı %18,3 idi. Erkek cinsiyetin, inkomplet kolonoskopi oranının, yetersiz barsak temizliği oranının ve Boston barsak temizliği skoru 0 ve 1 olan hastaların Suriyeli hasta grubunda daha yüksek olduğu görüldü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

PATMANO, M., ÇETİN, D. A. (2022). Comparison of Colonoscopy Results of Turkish and Syrian Patients, Frequency of Incomplete Colonoscopy and Causes of Incomplete Colonoscopy. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 230–238. https://ajindex.com/articles/634481

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, Knebel P, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Reduced risk of colorectal cancer up to 10 years after screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2014;146:709- 717
  2. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Shaheen NJ. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:31- 53
  3. Cappell MS, Friedel D. The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: technique, indications, and contraindications. Med Clin N Am 2002;86:1217-1252
  4. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, GiardielloFM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570-1595
  5. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, Ganiats T, Levin T, Woolf S, Johnson D, Kirk L, Litin S, Simmang C. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544-560
  6. Jung SA. Differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease: what is the role of colonoscopy? Clin Endosc 2012;45:254-262
  7. Koido S, Ohkusa T, Nakae K, Yokoyama T, Shibuya T, Sakamoto N, Uchiyama K, Ar akawa H, Osada T, Nagahara A, Watanabe S, Tajiri H. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy at a Japanese academic hospital. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:6961-6967
  8. Franco DL, Leighton JA, Gurudu SR. Approach to Incomplete Colonoscopy: New Techniques and Technologies. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;13:476- 483
  9. Neerincx M, Terhaar sive Droste JS, Mulder CJ, Räkers M, Bartelsman JF, Loffeld RJ,Tuynman HA, Brohet RM, van der Hulst RW. Colonic work-up after in complete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy 2010;42:730-735
  10. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, Robertson DJ, Boland CR, Giardello FM, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, Rex DK. US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi- Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2014;147:903- 924
  11. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros