SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

ISSUES IN THE USE OF THE EVENT STUDY METHODOLOGY: AN ANALYSIS OF MARKETING STRATEGIES IN PRODUCT RECALL STUDIES

Fatma Hilal ERGEN KELEŞ
Burç ÜLENGİN
Pages
181–198
Publication Date
2019-07-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We aim to guide further empirical studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Event study methodology, which relies on market efficiency, investigates stock price changes after an event.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Empirical findings of product recall studies suggest that a product recall cause to a decrease the firm value.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We aim to guide further empirical studies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Event study methodology · product harm crises · product recall

Özet

Event study methodology, which relies on market efficiency, investigates stock price changes after an event. Despite this methodology arises in the finance literature, it found a wide execution area including the marketing literature. Event study makes it possible to observe the effect of diverse marketing activities on financial value and is therefore very suitable for understanding marketingfinance interface. Empirical findings of product recall studies suggest that a product recall cause to a decrease the firm value. Furthermore, product recall studies adopt event studies that help better understand the reactions of the investors to different marketing strategies in a crisis context. However, only limited studies are available in this field. This paper covers (1) an instruction an instruction of the methodology, (2) a review that highlights the implementations of the method in the marketing literature, (3) summary of studies that measure the effect of marketing strategies in the product recall context, and (4) propositions for further empirical testing. We aim to guide further empirical studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

KELEŞ, F. H. E., ÜLENGİN, B. (2019). ISSUES IN THE USE OF THE EVENT STUDY METHODOLOGY: AN ANALYSIS OF MARKETING STRATEGIES IN PRODUCT RECALL STUDIES. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 181–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/6344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. AUSTIN, L., Fisher Liu, B., Jin, Y. (2012). How Audiences Seek Out Crisis Information: Exploring the Social-Mediated Crisis Communication Model. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(2), 188-207.
  2. BALL, R., Brown, P. (1968). An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 159-178.
  3. BEAMISH, P. W., Bapuji, H. (2008). Toy Recalls and China: Emotion vs. Evidence. Management and Organization Review, 4(2), 197-209.
  4. BERMAN, B. (1999). Planning For the Inevitable Product Recall. Business Horizons, 42(2), 69–78.
  5. BESSEMBINDER, H., Zhang, F. (2013). Firm Characteristics and Long-Run Stock Returns after Corporate Events. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 83-102.
  6. BINDER, J. (1998). The Event Study Methodology since 1969. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 11(2), 111-137.
  7. BOEHMER, E., Musumeci, J., Poulsen, A. B. (1991). Event-Study Methodology under Conditions of Event-Induced Variance. Journal of Financial Economics, 30(2), 253-272.
  8. BORAH, A., Tellis, G. J. (2014).
  9. Make, Buy, Or Ally? Choice Of and Payoff from Announcements of Alternate Strategies for Innovations. Marketing Science, 33(1), 114–133.
  10. BROWN, S. J., Warner, J. B. (1980). Measuring Security Price Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(3), 205-258.
  11. BROWN, S. J., Warner, J. B. (1985). Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31.
  12. CABALLERO, R. J. (1991). On The Sign of the Investment-Uncertainty Relationship. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 279-288.
  13. CAMPBELL, J. Y., Lo, A. W., Mackinlay, A. C. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  14. CARHART, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
  15. CHAO, G. H., Iravani, S. M. R., Savaskan, R. C. (2009). Quality Improvement Incentives And Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts. Management Science, 55(7), 1122–1138.
  16. CHEN, Y., Ganesan, S., Liu, Y. (2009). Does A Firm’s Product-Recall Strategy Affect Its Financial Value? An Examination of Strategic Alternatives during Product-Harm Crises. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 214-226.
  17. CHEN, Y., Nguyen, N. H. (2013). Stock Price And Analyst Earnings Forecast Around Product Recall Announcements. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(6), 1. CHU, T. H., Lin, C. C., Prather, L. J. (2005). An Extension of Security Price Reactions around Product Recall Announcements. Quarterly Journal of Business and Econ