SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Trichomonas vaginalis'in tanısında sitolojik ve parazitolojik yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması

A comparison of cytological and parasitological methods in the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis

Ülkü KARAMAN
Arserim Neval Berrin KAYA
Nilgün Ülfet DALDAL
Metin ATAMBAY
Neşe KARADAĞ
Pages
309–312
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), which causes urogenital system infections in humans, develops symptomatically and asymptomatically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 506 female patients who visited the Obstetrics and Gynecology policlinic of the Academic Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine, Inönü University during a course of six years were involved in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), which causes urogenital system infections in humans, develops symptomatically and asymptomatically. T. vaginalis in females is diagnosed using direct microscopy, Giemsa staining, and cultivation methods for examination of samples derived from the vaginal posterior fornix. Serologic methods can also be employed. In cytological diagnosis, the ectocervical smear is examined using the Papanicolaou (PAPS) stain. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the methods used in cytological and parasitological diagnosis. For this purpose, 506 female patients who visited the Obstetrics and Gynecology policlinic of the Academic Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine, Inönü University during a course of six years were involved in this study. The samples derived from the vaginal posterior fornix were examined in the parasitology laboratory, while the ectocervical samples were examined in the cytology laboratory. T. vaginalis was detected in 4.6% of the samples examined in parasitology laboratory, while parasites were found in only 0.9% of the samples taken to the cytology laboratory. The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference (P

Özet

İnsanlarda ürogenital sistem enfeksiyonlarına neden olan Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis) semptomatik ve asemptomatik seyreder. T. vaginalis'in tanısı, kadınlarda vagen arka forniksinden alınan örnegin; direkt mikroskobi, Giemsa boyama ve kültür yöntemleri ile incelenmesi sonucu konulur. Ayrıca serolojik yöntemlerden de yararlanılır. Sitolojik tanıda ise serviks ağzından alınan semear, Papanicolaou (PAPS) boyası ile incelenir. Sunulan çalışma sitolojik ve parazitolojik tanıda kullanılan yöntemlerin etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla yapılmıştır. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Araştırma Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Polikliniğine altı yıllık bir zaman sürecinde gelen 506 kadın hastanın vagen arka forniksinden alınan örnekler parazitoloji laboratuvarında, serviks ağzından alınan örnekler ise sitoloji laboratuvarında incelenmiştir. Parazitoloji laboratuvarına gelen örneklerin%4,6'sında T. vaginalis bulunmuş fakat sitolojiye gelen örneklerin ancak %0,9'unda bu parazite rastlanılmıştır. Yapılan istatistiki değerlendirmede anlamlı bir fark (P

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAMAN, Ü., KAYA, A. N. B., DALDAL, N. Ü., ATAMBAY, M., KARADAĞ, N. (2022). Trichomonas vaginalis'in tanısında sitolojik ve parazitolojik yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 309–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/630632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bowden FJ, Garnett GP, 2000. Trichomonas vaginalis epidemiolgy: Parametrising and analysing a model of treatment interventions. Sex Trans Infect, 76: 248-258
  2. Budak S, Akisu C, Dagci H, 1997. Other diagnostic materials and proper diagnostic methods. Diagnosis in parasitic diseases. Ozcel M.A., Altıntas N (Eds.) Published by Turkish Society of Parasitology, Izmir, No: 15, p.103-1066. [Turkish] 3) Budak S, Daldal N, 1987. Laboratory diagnosis of trichomoniasis. Trichomoniasis, Yasarol S Ed. Published by Turkish Society of Parasitology, İzmir No: 7, p.47-59. [Turkish] 4) Chakraborty T, Mulla SA, Kosambiya JK, Desai VK, 2005. Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in and around Surat. Indian J Pathol Microbiol, 48 (4): 542-545
  3. Chen XS, Yin YP, Liang GJ, Gong XD, LI, HS, Poumerol G, Thuy N, Shi MQ, Yu Yh, 2005. Sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in Yunnan, China. AIDS Patient Care STDS, 19: 853-860
  4. Churakov AA, Kulichenko AN, Suvorov AP, Glybochko PV, Kutyrev VV, 2005. Comparative assessment of the diagnostic value of the laboratory diagnostic methods for trichomoniasis. Med Parazitol, 3: 22-25
  5. Cohen CE, Gilmour C, Mandalia S, Mclean KA, 2006. Microscopy and culture for Trichomonas vaginalis: are both required? Int J Std AIDS, 17: 418-420
  6. Daldal N, Karaman U, Atambay M, 2002. The incidence of Trichomonas vaginalis among bar girls working in Malatya. Journal of Inonu University Medical Faculty, 9: 21-24
  7. Demirezen S. 1996. Trichomonas vaginalis and cytological diagnosis. Patology Bulletin. 13: 84-86
  8. Faust EC, Russel FP, Jung RC, 1977. Craig and Faust's. Clinical Parasitology. 8th Ed. Published in Great Britain by Henry Kimpton. London: p.67-74
  9. Karaman U, Atambay M, Yazar S, Daldal N, 2006. Investigation of the prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis with respect to diverse social variables in women in Malatya. Türkiye Parazitol Derg, 30: 11-15
  10. Klinger EV, Kapiga SH, Sam NE, Aboud S, Chen CY, Ballard RC, Larsen UA, 2006. Community-Based Study of Risk Factors for Trichomonas vaginalis infection among women and their male partners in Moshi Urban district, Northern Tanzania. Sex Transm Dis, 33(12): 712-718
  11. Malkawi SR, Abu Hazeem RM, Hajjat BM, Hajjiri FK, 2004. Evaluation of cervical smears at King Hussein Medical Centre, Jordan, over three and a half years. East Mediterr Health J, 10: 676-9
  12. Markel EK, Voge M, John DT, 1992. Medical Parasitology. 7th ed. W. B. Saunders com: p.72-75
  13. Mille