SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Identification of anopheles maculipennis group species using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the regions of Birecik, Beyşehir and Çankırı

Birecik, Beyşehir ve Çankırı bölgelerinde anopheles maculipennis grup türlerinin polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (PZR) kullanarak araştırılması

Selim S. ÇAĞLAR
Mustafa M AKINER
Pages
50–54
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most abundant species in Beyşehir and Çankırı has been determined to be An. maculipennis s.s.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Malaria is the most important vector borne disease in the world and is endemic in the southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Most important vector species for this disease are found within the Anopheles maculipennis group that is distributed in the Palaearctic Region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most abundant species in Beyşehir and Çankırı has been determined to be An. maculipennis s.s.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Malaria is the most important vector borne disease in the world and is endemic in the southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Most important vector species for this disease are found within the Anopheles maculipennis group that is distributed in the Palaearctic Region. The aim of this study was to identify the species of this group distributed within the regions of Birecik, Beyşehir and Çankırı using molecular methods. The results of the molecular analysis indicated that only populations of An. sacharovi which is the main malaria vector in our country are found in Biricik. Anopheles maculipennis s.s, Anopheles melanoon and An. sacharovi were identified in the Beyşehir region and An. maculipennis s.s and An. Sacharovi, in the Çankırı region. The most abundant species in Beyşehir and Çankırı has been determined to be An. maculipennis s.s.

Özet

Sıtma Dünya'da görülen en önemli vektöriyel kökenli hastalık olup ülkemizde de Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgesinde endemiktir. Palearktik bölgede bu hastalığın taşınımında rol alan önemli vektör türler ise Anopheles maculipennis grup içinde yer alan türlerdir. Bu çalışmada, Birecik, Beyşehir ve Çankırı bölgelerinde dağılım gösteren grup türlerinin araştırılması hedeflenmiş ve moleküler yöntemlerle tür teşhisi yapılmıştır. Örneklerin moleküler analizi sonucunda Birecik'te ülkemiz için ana vektör tür olan An. sacharovi türünün, Beyşehir bölgesinde Anopheles maculipennis s.s Anopheles melanoon ve An. sacharovi türlerinin, Çankırı bölgesinde ise An. maculipennis s.s ve An. sacharovi türlerinin bulunduğu belirlenmiştir. Beyşehir ve Çankırı bölgelerinde en yoğun bulunan türün An. maculipennis s.s olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAĞLAR, S. S., AKINER, M. M. (2022). Identification of anopheles maculipennis group species using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the regions of Birecik, Beyşehir and Çankırı. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 50–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/630526

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akdur R, 1997. Sıtma eğitim notları. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Projesi Genel Koordinatörlüğü, Cem Web Ofset Ltd. Şti. s. 69
  2. Alten SB, Çağlar SS, Özer N, 2000. Malaria and its vectors in Turkey. European Mosq Bull, 7: 27-33
  3. Becker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Dahl C, Lane J, Kaiser A, 2003. Mosquitoes and their control. Kluwer Academic, Plenum publishers, USA p. 498
  4. Boccolini D, Di Luca M, Marunici M, Romi R, 2003. Further molecular and morphologic support for he formal synonymy of An. subalpinus with An. melanoon European Mosq Bull, 16: 1-5
  5. Bruce-Chwatt L, de Zulueta J, 1980, The rise and fall of malaria in Europe. A-historico-epidemiological study, University Pres, Oxford. p. 240
  6. Çağlar SS, 2008. Proje raporu, Study of the resistance in commonly used insecticides, of natural mosquito populations, in the province of Thrace Greece and Turkey. TUBİTAK U-16 TBAG 105T531 nolu proje
  7. Djadid ND, Gholizadeh S, Tafsiri E, Romi R, Gordaev M, Zakeri S, 2007. Molecular identification of palearctic members of An. maculipennis complex in Northern Iran. Malaria Journal, 6: 6 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-6
  8. Erel D, 1973. Anadolu vektörleri ve mücadele metotları. T.C. Sağlık ve Sosyal Yardım Bakanlığı, Hıfzısıhha Okulu. Yayın no:47
  9. Falleroni D, 1926. Fauna anophelica italiana et suo ‘'Habitat'' (paludi, risae, canali). Metodi di lotta contro la malaria. Riv Malariol, 5: 553-593
  10. Jetten TH, Takken W, 1994. Anophelism without malaria in Europe –a review of the ecology and distribution of the genus Anopheles in Europe. Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 94-5
  11. Linton YM, Samanidou A, Harbach RE, 2002a. Ribosomal ITS2 sequence data for An. maculipennis and An. messae in northern Greece, with a critical assessment of previously published sequence. Insect Mol Biol, 11(4): 379-383
  12. Linton YM, Smith L, Harbach RE, 2002b. Observations on the taxonomic status of An. subalpinus and An. melanoon. European Mosq Bull, 13: 1-7
  13. Linton YM, Smith L, Koliopoulos G, Zounos AK, Smanidou-Voyadjoglou A, Patsoula E. Harbach RE, 2007. The An. (Anopheles) maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Greece. Journal of Natural History, 41(41-44): 2683-2699
  14. Nikolaeva N, 1996. Resurgence of malaria in the former Soviet Union (FSU). Sove News, 27: 10-11
  15. Parrish DW, 1959, The mosquitoes of Turkey. Mosq News, 19 (4): 264-266
  16. Postiglione M, Tabanlı B, Ramsdale CD, 1973, The Anopheles of Turkey. Rivista di Parasitologia, 34: 127-159.