Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

The effectiveness of functional back school concurrently applied with exercise and physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain-short term results

Kronik mekanik bel ağrılı hastalarda egzersiz ve fizik tedavi modaliteleri ile birlikte uygulanan fonksiyonel bel okulunun etkinliği-kısa dönemdeki sonuçlar

Pages
63–68
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, we believe that effective results can be obtained through the functional back school programme combined with other treatment modalities for patients with chronic mechanical LBP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of functional back school programme concurrently applied with an exercise and physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP) for a short time.Materials and Methods: Thirty seven patients diagnosed as chronic mechanical LBP were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A functional back school programme combined with physical therapy modalities and exercise programme was applied to patients for a period of 10 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, we believe that effective results can be obtained through the functional back school programme combined with other treatment modalities for patients with chronic mechanical LBP.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of functional back school programme concurrently applied with an exercise and physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP) for a short time.Materials and Methods: Thirty seven patients diagnosed as chronic mechanical LBP were included in this study. A functional back school programme combined with physical therapy modalities and exercise programme was applied to patients for a period of 10 days. Lumbar Schober and finger-toe distance were used for the assessment of lumbar mobility. Lumbar flexion-extension and lateral lumbar flexions were measured by an inclinometer. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale. For the assessment of functional disability; Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Rolland-Morris Functional Activities Questionnaire and Istanbul LBP Functional Scale were applied to the patients. Assessments were made before and after the treatment.Results: Only finger-toe distance of the mobility assessed parameters was determined to show a statistically significant difference (p=0.004). Furthermore, the pain score was decreased significantly (p=0.001) and all of the functional parameters showed significant improvement (Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire p=0.001, Rolland-Morris Functional Activities Questionnaire p=0.016 and Istanbul LBP Functional Scale p=0.014).Conclusion: In our study, we obtained a statistically significant decrease in pain sensation and functional disability in patients for a short time. Consequently, we believe that effective results can be obtained through the functional back school programme combined with other treatment modalities for patients with chronic mechanical LBP.

Özet

Amaç: Kronik mekanik bel ağrısında, fonksiyonel bel okuluyla birlikte eş zamanlı uygulanan egzersiz ve fizik tedavi modalitelerinin kısa dönemdeki etkinliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya kronik mekanik bel ağrısı tanısı alan 37 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalara 10 günlük fonksiyonel bel okulu programı ve beraberinde fizik tedavi modaliteleri ile egzersiz programı uygulandı. Mobilite değerlendirmesinde; lomber Schober ve el-parmak-zemin (EPZ) mesafesi ölçümü ile lomber fleksiyon, ekstansiyon, sağ ve sol lomber lateral fleksiyonların inklinometre ile ölçümü kullanıldı. Ağrı değerlendirmesi Vizüel Analog Skala ile yapıldı. Fonksiyonel Yetersizlik ölçümü için ise Düzeltilmiş Oswestry Özürlülük Sorgulama Formu, Rolland-Morris Sorgulama Formu ve İstanbul Bel Ağrısı Fonksiyonel Skalası kullanıldı. Hastalar tedavi öncesi ve tedavi programının bitiminde değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Çalışma sonucunda mobiliteyi ölçen değişkenlerden sadece EPZ mesafesinde başlangıca göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık mevcuttu (p=0.004). Ayrıca hastaların VAS değerlerinde belirgin azalma (p=0,001) ve fonksiyonel yetersizlik değerlendirmeleri için kullandığımız skalaların üçünde de (Oswestry Özürlülük Sorgulama Skalası p=0,001, Rolland-Morris Sorgulama Skalası p=0,016, İstanbul Bel Ağrısı Fonksiyonel Skalası p=0,014) istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzelme saptandı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda, kısa dönemde hastaların subjektif ağrı duyularında ve fonksiyonel yetersizliklerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı azalma sağladık. Sonuç olarak; kronik mekanik bel ağrılı hastalarda fonksiyonel bel okulunun diğer tedavi yöntemleriyle eşzamanlı olarak kullanılması ile etkin sonuçlar elde edilebileceği kanaatindeyiz

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICIOĞLU, K., ÖNDER, M. E., MÖHÜR, H., TUĞCU, İ. (2022). The effectiveness of functional back school concurrently applied with exercise and physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain-short term results. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 63–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/629122

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Quittan M. Management of back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:423-34
  2. Yıldız-Özcan E. Bel ağrısı. In: Beyazova M, Gökçe-Kutsal Y, eds. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi Ltd. Şti; 2000. p.1465-83
  3. Andersson GBJ, Frymoyer JW. Treatment of the injured worker. In: Pope HM, Andersson GBJ, Frymoyer JW, Chafin DB, editors. Occupational low back pain: assessment and treatment and prevention. St Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993. p.183-93
  4. Kaapa EH, Frantsi K, Sarna S, Malmivaara A. Multidisciplinary group rehabilitation versus individual physiotherapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized trial. Spine 2006;31:371-6
  5. Tavafian SS, Jamshidi A, Mohammad K, Montazeri A. Low back pain education and short term quality of life: a randomized trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8:21
  6. Penttinen J, Nevala-Puranen N, Airaksinen O, Jaaskelainen M, Sintonen H, Takala J. Randomized Controlled Trial of Back School With and Without Peer Support. J Occupational Rehabil 2002;12:21-9
  7. Van Der Roer N, Van Tulder MW, Barendse JM, van Mechelen W, Franken WK, Ooms AC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an intensive group training protocol compared to physiotherapy guideline care for sub-acute and chronic low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial with an economic evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004;5:45
  8. Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW. Back schools for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the CCBRG. Spine 2005;30:2153-63 9. Hodselmans AP, Jaegers SM, Goeken LN. Short-term outcomes of a back school program for chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1099-105
  9. Özcan E. Bel ağrılı hastaların konservatif tedavisi. In: Özcan E, Ketenci A, eds. Bel Ağrısı. İstanbul: Nobel Kitabevi; 2002.p.187-219
  10. Van Tulder MW, Goossens M, Waddell G, Nachemson AL. Conservative treatment of choronic low back pain. In: Nachemson AL, Jonsson E, eds. Neck and Back Pain: The Scientific Evidence of Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.p.271-304
  11. Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspesific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine 1997;22:2128-56
  12. Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Assendorf JW, Bouter LM. Chronic low back pain: exercise therapy, multidisciplinary programs, NSAID's, back schools and behavioral therapy