SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the efficacy of whirlpool and paraffin treatments in women with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis

Semptomatik el osteoartriti olan kadınlarda girdap ve parafin tedavilerinin etkinliklerinin karşılaştırması

Nurdan PAKER
Derya BUĞDAYCI SOY
Demet UÇAR
Ebru YALÇINKAYA YILMAZ
Pages
124–127
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Significant improvement was obtained in terms of VAS, AUSCAN and SF-36 scores at 3- and 12-week follow-up visits in both groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits of whirlpool and paraffin treatments and to compare the efficacy of both methods in symptomatic hand osteoarthritis (OA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Treatmentperiod was 15 sessions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Significant improvement was obtained in terms of VAS, AUSCAN and SF-36 scores at 3- and 12-week follow-up visits in both groups (p
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits of whirlpool and paraffin treatments and to compare the efficacy of both methods in symptomatic hand osteoarthritis (OA). Material and Methods: Fifty-eight women with symptomatic hand OA were randomized into whirlpool and paraffin treatment groups. Treatmentperiod was 15 sessions. Pain was measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functional status was evaluated by the Australian/Canadian(AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index, and SF-36 was used for quality of life assessment at baseline and at 3 and 12 weeks. Results: Significant improvement was obtained in terms of VAS, AUSCAN and SF-36 scores at 3- and 12-week follow-up visits in both groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı semptomatik el osteoartrit (OA)’inde girdap ve parafin tedavilerinin faydasını araştırmak ve bu metodların etkinliğini karşı laştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Elli sekiz semptomatik el OA’sı olan hasta, girdap ve para fin grubu olarak iki gruba randomize edildi. Tedavi periyodu 15 seans ola rak belirlendi. Ağrı, Vizüel Analog Skala (VAS); fonksiyonel durum Australian/ Canadian (AUSCAN) OA El İndeksi; yaşam kalitesi Kısa form 36 (SF-36) ile başlangıçta, 3. ve 12. haftada değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Her iki grubun VAS, AUSCAN ve SF-36 skorları, 3. ve 12.haftada istatistik olarak anlamlı düzelme gösterdi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

PAKER, N., SOY, D. B., UÇAR, D., YILMAZ, E. Y. (2022). Comparison of the efficacy of whirlpool and paraffin treatments in women with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3, 124–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/628981

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Zhang Y, Niu J, Kelly-Hayes M, Chaisson CE, Aliabadi P, Felson DT. Prevalence of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and its impact on functional status among the elderly. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:1021-7
  2. Rannou F, Poiraudeau S. Non-pharmacological approaches for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:93-106
  3. Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden NK, Bijlsma JM et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCITIS), Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:377-8
  4. Valdes K, Marik T. A systematic review of conservative interventions for osteoarthritis of the hand. J Hand Ther 2010;23:334-51
  5. Altman R, Alarcón G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1601-10
  6. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B, Buchbinder R, Hobby K, Roth JH, et al. Dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in hand osteoarthritis: Development of the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:855-62
  7. Ware JE, Sherbourne DC. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992;30:473-83
  8. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö. Fişek G. Ölmez N, Memiş A. Kısa Form-36 (KF-36)'nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999;12:102-6
  9. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-501
  10. Conaghan PG, Dickson J, Grant RL. Guideline Development Group; Care and management of osteoarthritis in adults: summary of NICE guidance BMJ 2008;336:502-3
  11. Bender T, Karagülle Z, Bálint G P, Gutenbrunner C, Bálint P V, Sukenik S. Hydrotherapy, balneotherapy and spa treatment in pain management. Rheumatol Int 2005;25:220-4
  12. Borrell R M, Parker R, Henley E J, Masley D, Repinecz M. Comparison of in vivo temperatures produced by hydrotherapy, paraffin wax treatment and fluidotherapy. Phys Ther 1980;60:1273-6
  13. Forestier R, Françon A. Crenobalneotherapy for limb osteoarthritis. Systematic literature review and methodological analysis. Joint Bone Spine 2008;75:138-48
  14. Saeki Y, Nagai N, Hishinuma M. Effects of footbathing on autonomic nerve and immun function. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2007;13:158-65
  15. Stange-Reze