Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2

The impact of physical therapy programs on pain and quality of life

Fizik tedavi programlarının ağrı ve hayat kalitesi üzerine etkisi

Pages
99–102
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both before (p=0.022) and after the treatment (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Musculoskeletal system (MSS) diseases comprise a major health problem with negative impact on quality of life of individuals and considerable burden on health care systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 160 patients, who participated in a physical therapy program for their neck, shoulder, knee or low back pain, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both before (p=0.022) and after the treatment (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Musculoskeletal system (MSS) diseases comprise a major health problem with negative impact on quality of life of individuals and considerable burden on health care systems. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of physical therapy programs used in the treatment of various MSS disorders on the patients pain and quality of life. Materials and Methods: 160 patients, who participated in a physical therapy program for their neck, shoulder, knee or low back pain, were included in the study. The patients age, sex, and the type of the prescribed physical therapy modality and exercise were recorded. Before and after the treatment, in order to evaluate the change in the severity of pain and quality of life, the patients were respectively asked to complete the visual analog scale (VAS) and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) measure. Results: The mean age of the patients was 51.8±13.2 (21-85) years. The most commonly used modalities were hot packs among superficial heaters, ultrasound among deep heaters and TENS among analgesic currents. Whereas the most frequently prescribed exercises were strengthening exercises, stretching and range of motion exercises were rarely recommended. The average pre-treatment VAS score was 6.7±2.1 cm (0-10) and EQ-5D score was 0.30±0.34 (-0.43-0.90). After the treatment, these scores were recorded as 4.3±2.5 (0-10) and 0.59±0.28 (-0.69-1.00), respectively. Both before (p=0.022) and after the treatment (p

Özet

Amaç: Kas iskelet sistemi (KİS) hastalıkları bireylerin yaşam kalitesini olumsuz etkileyen ve sağlık harcamalarına ciddi yük oluşturan önemli bir sağlık sorunudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı çeşitli KİS patolojilerinin tedavisinde kullanılan fizik tedavi programlarının ağrı ve hayat kalitesi üzerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya boyun, omuz, diz ve bel bölgesine yönelik fizik tedavi programı uygulanmış olan toplam 160 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, hastalara önerilen fizik tedavi modalitelerinin ve egzersizin türü kaydedildi. Tedavi öncesi ve sonrası hastalardan ağrı ve hayat kalitelerindeki değişimi değerlendirmek amacıyla sırasıyla vizüel analog skalayı (VAS) ve EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) ölçeğini yanıtlamaları istendi. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 51,8±13,2 (21-85) yıldı. Yüzeyel ısıtıcılardan hotpack, derin ısıtıcılardan ultrason, analjezik akımlardan ise TENS en sık kullanılan modalitelerdi. Hastalara en sık güçlendirme egzersizleri, çok daha az sıklıkla eklem hareket açıklığı ve germe egzersizleri önerilmişti. Hastaların tedavi öncesi VAS skoru 6,7±2,1 (0-10) ve EQ-5D skoru 0,30±0,34 (-0,43-0,90) iken fizik tedavi sonrasında bu değerler sırasıyla 4,3±2,5 (0-10) ve 0,59±0,28 (-0,69-1,00) olarak belirlendi. Kadınlarda erkeklere oranla ağrı şiddeti tedavi öncesi (p=0,022) ve sonrası (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, O., TAŞOĞLU, Ö., HAGHARİ, F. S., ÇETİN, A. (2022). The impact of physical therapy programs on pain and quality of life. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2, 99–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/628947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003
  2. Schnitzer TJ. Update on guidelines for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Clin Rheumatol 2006
  3. 25(Suppl 1):22-9. 3.Kean WF, Rainsford KD, Kean IRL. Management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in the elderly: opinions on oral medication use. Inflammopharmacology 2008
  4. Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press
  5. Eser E, Dinç G, Cambaz S ve ark. EURO-QoL (EQ-5D) indeksinin toplum standartları ve psikometrik özellikleri: Manisa kent toplumu örneklemi. 2. Sağlıkta Yaşam Kalitesi Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı. İzmir: Meta Basımevi
  6. p. 78. 6.Urwin M, Symmons D, Allison T, Brammah T, Busby H, Roxby M, et al. Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Ann Rheum Dis 1998
  7. Antonopoulou M, Antonakis N, Hadjipavlou A, Lionis C. Patterns of pain and consulting behaviour in patients with musculoskeletal disorders in rural crete, Greece. Fam Pract 2007
  8. Woo J, Leung J, Lau E. Prevalence and correlates of musculoskeletal pain in Chinese elderly and the impact on 4-year physical function and quality of life. Public Health 2008
  9. Wijnhoven HAH, Vet HCW, Picavet HSJ. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders is systematically higher in women than in men. Clin J Pain 2006
  10. Elliott AM, Smith BH, Penny KI, Smith WC, Chambers WA. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet 1999
  11. 11Scudds RJ, Robertson JM. Pain factors associated with physical disability in a sample of community-dwelling senior citizens. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000
  12. M393-9. 12. Barton GR, Sach TH, Avery AJ, Doherty M, Jenkinson C, Muir KR. Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D when measuring the benefits of alleviating knee pain. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2009
  13. Fransen M, Edmonds J. Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatol 1999
  14. Picavet HSJ, Hoeymans N. Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases:SF-36 and EQ-5D in DMC3 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004
  15. 9, 15. Lips P, van Schoor NM. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 20