Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2

Sol ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonunun inme rehabilitasyon sonuçlarına etkisi

The ımpact of left ventricular ejection fraction on measures of stroke rehabilitation outcome

Pages
108–111
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2013;59:108-11.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on stroke rehabilitation outcome measures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the basis of the left ventricular ejection fraction, the patients were grouped into two groups: (1) those with low ejection fractions (ejection fraction ≤50%) and (2) those with high ejection fractions (ejection fraction >50%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2013;59:108-11.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on stroke rehabilitation outcome measures. Materials and Methods: Forty first-ever stroke patients admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation unit at a tertiary research hospital were enrolled in the study. On the basis of the left ventricular ejection fraction, the patients were grouped into two groups: (1) those with low ejection fractions (ejection fraction ≤50%) and (2) those with high ejection fractions (ejection fraction >50%). Thirteen patients had low ejection fraction and 27 had high ejection fraction. Admission and discharge functionastatus was measured with total, motor and cognitive components of the Functional Independence MeasureTM (FIM). A Functional Ambulatory Scale was used to measure the ambulatory status of the patients upon discharge. Results: The admission total, motor and cognitive FIM scores in both groups were not significantly different. However, the low ejection fraction group had significantly lower discharge motor, total FIM and functionaambulatory scores than did the high ejection fraction group. Conclusion: A decreased left ventricular ejection fraction may impair walking ability and rehabilitation outcome in first-ever stroke patients. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2013;59:108-11.

Özet

Amaç: Sol ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonunun inme rehabilitasyon sonuçlarına etkisini araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Üçüncü basamak araştırma hastanesinin rehabilitasyon ünitelerine başvuran, ilk kez inme geçiren 40 hasta çalışmaya alındı.ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonuna göre hastalar düşük ejeksiyon fraksiyonlu (ejeksiyon fraksiyon ≤%50 ) ve yüksek ejeksiyon fraksiyonlu (ejeksiyon fraksiyon >%50) olarak gruplandırıldı. On üç hastanın düşük ejeksiyon fraksiyonu, 27 hastanın yüksek ejeksiyon fraksiyonu vardı. Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık ÖlçeğininTM (FBÖ) total, motor ve bilişsel komponenetleri kullanılarak başlangıç ve taburculuk fonksiyonel durum değerlendirmesi yapıldı. Fonksiyonel Ambülasyon Skalası kullanılarak taburculukta hastaların ambülasyon durumu değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Başlangıç total, motor, bilişsel FBÖ skorları arasında istatistiksel fark yoktu. Ancak düşük ejeksiyon fraksiyonlu grubun taburculuk motortotal FBÖ ve fonksiyonel ambülasyon skorları yüksek ejeksiyon fraksiyonu olan gruptan istatistiksel olarak belirgin düşüktü. Sonuç: Düşük ejeksiyon fraksiyonu ilk kez inme geçirmiş hastalarda rehabilitasyon sonuçlarını ve yürüme fonksiyonunu bozabilir. Türk FizRe­hab Derg 2013;59:108-11

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAŞ, Ş., TAFLAN, S. S., ULUÇAM, M. Z. (2022). Sol ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonunun inme rehabilitasyon sonuçlarına etkisi. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2, 108–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/628878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sharma JC, Fletcher S, Vassallo M, Ross I. Cardiovascular disease and outcome of acute stroke: influence of pre-existing cardiac failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2000;2:145-50
  2. Roth EJ. Heart disease in patients with stroke. Part II: Impact and implications for rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:94-101
  3. Kimura K, Minematsu K, Kazui S, Yamaguchi T. Japan Multicenter Stroke Investigators’ Collaboration (J-MUSIC). Mortality and cause of death after hospital discharge in 10981 patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;19:171-8
  4. Roth EJ, Mueller K, Gren D. Stroke rehabilitation outcome: impact of coronary artery disease. Stroke 1988;19:42-7
  5. Gordon NF, Gulanick M, Costa F, Fletcher G, Franklin BA, Roth EJ, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Circulation 2004;109:2031-41
  6. Houdijk H, ter Hoeve N, Nooijen C, Rijntjes D, Tolsma M, Lamoth C. Energy expenditure of stroke patients during postural control tasks. Gait Posture 2010;32:321-6
  7. Remme WJ, Swedberg K; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure, European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1527-60
  8. Granger CV, Gresham GE. New developments in functional assessment. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 1993;4:417-99
  9. Yavuzer G, Süldür N, Küçükdeveci A, Elhan A. Türkiye’de nörorehabilitasyon hastalarının değerlendirilmesinde Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçeği ve Modifiye Barthel İndeksi’nin yeri. J Rheum Med Rehab 2000;11:26-31
  10. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83
  11. Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Ozmaden A, Kotevolu N, Sahin T, Kuran B. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Berg Balance Scale. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2008;31:32-7
  12. Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:576-9
  13. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairement and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1