Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 4

Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy Applications: Assessment of Our Cases Between 2004-2012

İntratekal Baklofen Tedavisi Uygulamalarımız: 2004-2012 Yılları Arası Olgularımızın Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
295–301
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During the follow-up period, pump-related complications were seen in 2 patients.Conclusion: ITB is an effective and safe treatment option in severe spasticity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the effects of intrathecal baclofen therapy (ITB) in patients with severe spasticity.Material and Methods: Patients who had a baclofen pump implanted between 2004-2012 were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The inclusion criteria were severe spasticity with nonresponse to medical oral therapy and physiotherapy, modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score 3-4, and Penn's spasm scale (PSS) score 3-4.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During the follow-up period, pump-related complications were seen in 2 patients.Conclusion: ITB is an effective and safe treatment option in severe spasticity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of intrathecal baclofen therapy (ITB) in patients with severe spasticity.Material and Methods: Patients who had a baclofen pump implanted between 2004-2012 were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were severe spasticity with nonresponse to medical oral therapy and physiotherapy, modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score 3-4, and Penn's spasm scale (PSS) score 3-4. The ITB assessment criteria were MAS, PSS, visual analog scale (VAS), functional independence measurement (FIM), and short form-36 (SF-36) Tests were given before ITB and 3 months after implantation. Results: Twenty-one patients were given the test dose, and the ITB pump was implanted for 16. There were 11 men (68.75%) and 5 women (31.25%). Mean age was 33±10.34, ranging between 12-53 years. Eleven (68.75%) had spinal cord injury, 2 (12.50%) had multiple sclerosis, 2 (12.50%) had cerebral palsy, and 1 (6.25%) had a hypoxic brain. Eleven (68.75%) of these patients were paraplegic, 4 were (25%) tetraplegic, and 1 had (6.25%) dystonic cerebral palsy. Mean follow-up was 52.25±33.10 months, ranging between 3-100 months. Daily baclofen dose was between 70-475 µg (average 220±110.58 µg). Modified Ashworth scale decreased from 3.43±0.53 to 1.00±0.73 (p=0.00); PSS decreased from 3.50±1.03 to 1.12±1.02 (p=0.001); global pain decreased from 44.37±36.14 to 18.75±19.95, (p=0.003); FIM increased from 71.18±20.88 to 76.31±28.25 (p=0.023); SF-36 physical function increased from 2.06±8.25 to 18.25±26.06 (p=0.006); physical role difficulty increased from 1.56±6.25 to 40.31±29.74 (p=0.002); general health increased from 29.37±17.68 to 47.62±27.35 (p=0.005); pain increased from 26.31±30.49 to 53.37±26.45 (p=0.005); vitality increased from 38.93±20.94 to 61.25±19.70 (p=0.001); social function increased from 19.31±14.59 to 70.56±82.74 (p=0.001); emotional role difficulty increased from 10.37±26.40 to 56.31±38.08 (p=0.004); and mental health increased from 46.25±18.12 to 61.12±19.81 (p=0.004). During the follow-up period, pump-related complications were seen in 2 patients.Conclusion: ITB is an effective and safe treatment option in severe spasticity.

Özet

Amaç: Ciddi spastisitesi olan hastalarda intratekal baklofen (İTB) tedavisininetkilerini değerlendirmek.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamızda 2004-2012 yılları arasında İTBtedavisi için pompa takılan hastalar incelemeye alınmıştır. Çalışmayaalınma kriterleri; oral medikal tedavi ve fizyoterapiye cevap vermeyenciddi spastisite ile modifiye Ashworth skalası (MAS) ve Penn spazm frekansı(PSF) skorlarının da 3-4 arasında olması idi. İntratekal baklofen etkinliğinindeğerlendirilmesi MAS, PSF, vizüel analog skala (VAS), fonksiyonelbağımsızlık ölçeği (FIM), kısa form-36 (SF-36) ile yapılmıştır. Testler, İTBöncesinde ve pompa takıldıktan sonraki 3. ayda verilmiştir.Bulgular: Yirmi bir hastaya test dozu verilmiş ve 16 hastaya pompatakılmıştır. Hastaların 11'i (%68,75) erkek, 5'i (%31,25) ise kadındı.Yaş aralığı 12-53 yıl arasında değişmekte olup, ortalama 33±10,34 yılolarak bulundu. On bir (%68,75) spinal kord yaralanması, 2 (%12,50)multipl skleroz, 2 (%12,50) serebral palsi, 1 (%6,25) hipoksik beyinsendromu olan hasta çalışmaya alındı. Bunların 11'i (%68,75) paraplejik,4'ü (%25) tetraplejik, 1'i (%6,25) ise distonik serebral palsi idi. Hastaizlem süremiz 2-100 ay arasında olup, ortalama 52,25±33,10 aydı.Ortalama günlük baklofen dozu 220±110,58 µg olup, 70-475 µgarasında değişmekte idi. Modifiye Ashworth skalası 3,43±0,53'den1,00±0,73'e (p=0,00); PSF 3,50±1,03'den 1,12±1,02'ye (p=0,001); VAS44,37±36,14'den 18,75±19,95'e (p=0,003) düştü; FIM 71,18±20,88'den76,31±28,25'e (p=0,023); SF-36 fiziksel fonksiyon 2,06±8,25'den18,25±26,06'ya (p=0,006); fiziksel rol güçlüğü 1,56±6,25'den40,31±29,74'e (p=0,002); sağlığın genel algılanması 29,37±17,68'den47,62±27,35'e (p=0,005); ağrı 26,31±30,49'dan 53,37±26,45'e(p=0,005); vitalite 38,93±20,94'den 61,25±19,70'e (p=0,001); sosyalfonksiyon 19,31±14,59'dan 70,56±82,74'e (p=0,001); emosyonel rol güçlüğü 10,37±26,40'dan 56,31±38,08'e (p=0,004); mental sağlık46,25±18,12'den 61,12±19,81'e yükseldi (p=0,004). Takip sırasında 2hastada pompa ile ilgili komplikasyon gelişti.Sonuç: Ciddi spastisitede İTB etkin ve güvenilir bir tedavi seçeneğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKCI, A., ÇEVİKOL, A., SORAR, M., ECERKALE, Ö., SANCIOĞLU, H. (2022). Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy Applications: Assessment of Our Cases Between 2004-2012. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 4, 295–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/628780

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Lance JW. Pathophysiology of spasticity and clinical experience with baclofen. In: Lance JW, Feldman RG, Young RR, Koella WP, editors. Spasticity, disordered motor control. Chicago: Year Book; 1980.p.185-204
  2. Davidoff RA, Sears ED. The effects of lioresal on synaptic activity in the isolated spinal cord. Neurology 1974;24:957-63. [CrossRef] 3. Penn RD, Kroin JS. Intrathecal baclofen in the long-term management of severe spasticity. Neurosurgery 1989;4:325-32
  3. Kroin JS, Penn RD. Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of lumbar intrathecal baclofen. In Lakke JPWF, Delhaas EM, Rutgers AWE editors. Parenteral drug therapy in spasticity and parkinson's disease. Parhenon Publishing, Canforth UK: Year Book;1991.p.73-83
  4. Kroin JS, Ali A, York M, Penn RD. The distribution of medication along the spinal canal after chronic intrathecal administration. Neurosurgery 1993;33:226-30. [CrossRef] 6. Haas BM, Bergström E, Jamous A, Bennie A. The inter rater reliability of the original and of the modified Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1996;34:560-4. [CrossRef] 7. Penn RD, Savoy SM, Corcos D, Latash M, Gottlieb G, Parke B, et al. Intrathecal baclofen for severe spinal spasticity. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1517-21. [CrossRef] 8. Ethans K. Intrathecal baclofen therapy: indications, pharmacology, surgical implant and efficacy. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007;97:155-62
  5. Natale M,Mirone G, Rotondo A, Moraci A. Intrathecal baclofen therapy for severe spasticity: analysis on a series of 112 consecutive patients and future prospectives. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012;114:321-5. [CrossRef] 10. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fiedler R, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-8. [CrossRef] 11. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF 36)
  6. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83. [CrossRef] 12. Küçükdeveci A. Rehabilitasyonda yaşam kalitesi-Derleme. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg 2005;51(Özel Ek B):23-9
  7. Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the functional independence measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:311-9. [CrossRef] 14. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Kısa Form 36 (KF- 36) nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. Romatizmal hast