Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4

Hemiplejik Hastaların Aile Üyelerinin Anksiyete ve Umutsuzluk Düzeylerine Afazinin Etkisi

Effect of Aphasia on the State-Trait Anxiety and Hopelessness Levels of the Family Members of Hemiplegic Patients

Pages
352–357
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no significant difference between the trait anxiety level and hopelessness level of the family members caring for aphasic or nonaphasic hemiplegic patients (p>0.05), whereas there was a significant difference between the state anxiety levels (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the state-trait anxiety and hopelessness levels of the family members/caregivers of patients who had developed aphasic or non-aphasic hemiplegia following a cerebrovascular event.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: We included a total of 40 hemiplegic patients, 20 aphasic and 20 non-aphasic, and 40 family members who provided care for these patients in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no significant difference between the trait anxiety level and hopelessness level of the family members caring for aphasic or nonaphasic hemiplegic patients (p>0.05), whereas there was a significant difference between the state anxiety levels (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the state-trait anxiety and hopelessness levels of the family members/caregivers of patients who had developed aphasic or non-aphasic hemiplegia following a cerebrovascular event. Material and Methods: We included a total of 40 hemiplegic patients, 20 aphasic and 20 non-aphasic, and 40 family members who provided care for these patients in this study. The patients' demographic features were recorded. The same investigator used the Gülhane Aphasia Test (GAT) to evaluate whether the patients were aphasic, the State-Trait Anxiety Scale to determine the anxiety level, and the Beck Hopelessness Scale to determine the hopelessness level of the family members. Results: The mean age was 54.10±14.18 years for the aphasic patients and 66.70±13.44 years for the non-aphasic patients. There were 8 females (40%) and 12 males (60%) in both groups. All family members caring for the patients were female. The mean scale scores were as follows: state anxiety 47.8±6.64 (35-57), trait anxiety 52.25±7.91 (39-64), and hopelessness 11.65+1.81 (8-15) in the aphasic group; state anxiety 42.20±7.68 (29-59), trait anxiety 49.25±11.27 (27-71), and hopelessness 12.05±2.16 (8-16) in the non-aphasic group. There was no significant difference between the trait anxiety level and hopelessness level of the family members caring for aphasic or nonaphasic hemiplegic patients (p>0.05), whereas there was a significant difference between the state anxiety levels (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda amacımız; serebrovasküler olay sonrasında hemipleji gelişmiş afazik olan ve olmayan hastaların bakımlarını üstlenen birinci derece yakınlarının durumluk-sürekli anksiyete ve umutsuzluk düzeylerini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 20 afazik ve 20 afazik olmayan olmak üzere toplam 40 hemiplejik hasta ve bu hastaların bakımlarını üstlenen 40 birinci derece yakını dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri kaydedildi. Aynı araştırmacı tarafından hastaların afazik olup olmadığını belirlemek için Gülhane Afazi Testi (GAT), hemiplejik hastalarının bakımlarını üstlenen birinci derece yakınlarının anksiyete düzeyini belirmek için Beck Durumluk-Sürekli Anksiyete Ölçeği ve umutsuzluk düzeyini belirlemek için Beck Umutsuzluk Ölçeği uygulandı. Bulgular: Afazik olan hastaların yaş ortalaması 54,10±14,18 yıl ve afazik olmayan hastalarının yaş ortalaması 66,70±13,44 yıl idi. Her iki grupta da hastaların 8'i (%40) kadın ve 12'si (%60) erkekti. Hastaların bakımını üstelenen birinci derece yakınlarının tamamı kadındı. Ölçeklerin puan ortalamaları; afazik grupta durumluk anksiyete için 47,8+6,64 , sürekli anksiyete için 52,25+7,91 , umutsuzluk için ise 11,65+1,81 (815); afazik olmayan grupta ise durumluk anksiyete için 42,20+7,68 , sürekli anksiyete için 49,25+11,27 , umutsuzluk için ise 12,05+2,16 olarak bulundu. Afazik olan ve olmayan hemiplejik hastaların bakımlarını üstlenen birinci derece yakınlarının sürekli anksiyete düzeyi ve umutsuzluk düzeyi arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmazken (p>0,05), durumluk anksiyete düzeyleri arasında anlamlı farklılık (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKMEŞE, P. P., ALTINOK, N., YÜZER, G. F. N., ÖZGİRGİN, N. (2022). Hemiplejik Hastaların Aile Üyelerinin Anksiyete ve Umutsuzluk Düzeylerine Afazinin Etkisi. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4, 352–357. https://ajindex.com/articles/628745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Özeren A. Aphasiology. Adana: Çukurova University Publication; 2002. Çalıyurt O. Psychiatric Problems in Hemiplegic Patients. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2007;53:16-8.
  2. Godefroy O, Dubois C, Debachy B, Leclerc M, Kreisler A; Lille Stroke Program. Vascular aphasias: main characteristics of patients hospital- ized in acute stroke units. Stroke 2002;33:702-5. [CrossRef] Aftonomos LB, Appelbaum JS, Steele RD. Improving outcomes for per- sons with aphasia in advanced community-based treatment programs. Stroke 1999;30:1370-9. [CrossRef] Tanrıdağ O. Aphasia. 3rd Edition Ankara: Nobel Medicine Publication; 1993.
  3. Pedersen PM, Jİrgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determiants and recovery. Ann Neu- rol 1995;38:659-66. [CrossRef] Code C. The quantity of life for people with chronic aphasia. Neuropsy- chol Rehabil 2003;13:379-90. [CrossRef] Dalemans RJ, De Witte LP, Beurskens AJ, Van Den Heuvel WJ, Wade DT. An investigation into social participation of stroke survivors with apha- sia. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1678-85. [CrossRef] Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: tracking social exclusion. Aphasiol- ogy 2007;21:198-23. [CrossRef] Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L. Quantifying aphasia people`s social lives in the context of non-aphasic peers. Aphasiology 2006;20:1210-25. [CrossRef] Le Dorze G, Brassard C. A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO- model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology 1995;9:239-55. [CrossRef] Van den Heuvel ET, de Witte LP, Schure LM, Sanderman R, Meyboom- de Jong B. Risk factors for burn-out in caregivers of stroke patients, and possibilities for intervention. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:669-77. [CrossRef] Scholte op Reimer WJ, de Haan RJ, Rijnders PT, Limburg M, van den Bos GA. The Burden of Caregiving in Partners of Long-Term Stroke Survi- vors. Stroke 1998;29:1605-11. [CrossRef] Anderson CS, Linto J, Stewart-Wynne EG. Population-Based Assessment of the Impact and Burden of Caregiving for Long-term Stroke Survivors. Stroke 1995;26:843-9. [CrossRef] Moroni L, Colangelo M, Gallì M, Bertolotti G. A "I would like to give him my life": results of a psychological support intervention to caregivers of patients undergoing neuromotor rehabilitation. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2007;29:B5-17. Blake H, Lincoln NB, Clarke DD. Caregiver strain in spouses of stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:312-7. [CrossRef] Ski C, O'Connell B. Stroke: the increasing complexity o