Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1

Sağlıklı sedanter bireylerin dominant ve non-dominant bacak kas reaksiyon zamanı ve propriosepsiyonu

Muscle latency and proprioception in non-dominant and dominant legs of healthy sedentary individuals

Pages
51–57
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Joint position sense measured actively and passivelyand kinesthesia were used to evaluate proprioception of the ankle joint.Results: Neither the latency times of the tibialis anterior and peroneuslongus muscles nor the proprioceptive ability score measurementsexhibited signifcant differences between the non-dominant anddominant legs (p>0.05).Conclusion: The results of this investigation indicates that there is noside differences between the limbs with the evaluation of the peroneuslongus or tibialis anterior muscle reaction times, ankle joint positionsense, and ankle kinesthesia for healthy sedentary individuals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AbstractObjective: The effects of lower extremity dominance on responselatency and proprioceptive ability have been reported for physicallyactive individuals, but not for sedentary individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim ofthis research was to explore the differences in muscle latency andproprioceptive ability between the non-dominant and dominant legsof healthy sedentary individuals.Material and Methods: Nineteen healthy male subjects without ahistory of any physical training practice for a minimum of 12 monthswere enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Joint position sense measured actively and passivelyand kinesthesia were used to evaluate proprioception of the ankle joint.Results: Neither the latency times of the tibialis anterior and peroneuslongus muscles nor the proprioceptive ability score measurementsexhibited signifcant differences between the non-dominant anddominant legs (p>0.05).Conclusion: The results of this investigation indicates that there is noside differences between the limbs with the evaluation of the peroneuslongus or tibialis anterior muscle reaction times, ankle joint positionsense, and ankle kinesthesia for healthy sedentary individuals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AbstractObjective: The effects of lower extremity dominance on responselatency and proprioceptive ability have been reported for physicallyactive individuals, but not for sedentary individuals. The aim ofthis research was to explore the differences in muscle latency andproprioceptive ability between the non-dominant and dominant legsof healthy sedentary individuals.Material and Methods: Nineteen healthy male subjects without ahistory of any physical training practice for a minimum of 12 monthswere enrolled in this study. An ankle inversion tilting platform was usedto measure the reaction times of the tibialis anterior and peroneuslongus muscles. Joint position sense measured actively and passivelyand kinesthesia were used to evaluate proprioception of the ankle joint.Results: Neither the latency times of the tibialis anterior and peroneuslongus muscles nor the proprioceptive ability score measurementsexhibited signifcant differences between the non-dominant anddominant legs (p>0.05).Conclusion: The results of this investigation indicates that there is noside differences between the limbs with the evaluation of the peroneuslongus or tibialis anterior muscle reaction times, ankle joint positionsense, and ankle kinesthesia for healthy sedentary individuals.

Özet

Amaç: Fiziksel aktif kişilerde alt ekstremite dominant taraf etkisinin kasreaksiyon zamanı ve propriosepsiyonu üzerine olan etkisinin ne yöndeolduğu bilinmektedir. Bu etki sedanter bireylerde ise araştırılmamıştır.Bu çalışmanın amacı sağlıklı sedanter bireylerde dominant ve non-dominant bacaktaki kas reaksiyon zamanı ve propriosepsiyon farklılığınıincelemektir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya daha önce en az 12 ay süreyleherhangi bir fziksel aktivite programına katılmayan 19 sağlıklı erkekdenek katılmıştır. Peroneus longus ve tibialis anterior kaslarınınreaksiyon zamanı ayak bileği inversiyon burkulma platformu kullanılarakölçülmüştür. Ayak bileğinin proprioseptif becerisi aktif ve pasif eklempozisyon hissi ve kinestezi testleri ile değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Peroneus longus ve tibialis anterior kas reaksiyon zamanlarıve proprioseptif beceri skorları ölçümleri dominant ve non-dominantbacak arasında anlamlı bir farklılık göstermemiştir (p>0,05).Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları peroneus longus ve tibialis anteriorkas reaksiyon zamanı, ayak bileği eklem pozisyon hissi ve kinestezideğerlendirmeleri ışığı altında sağlıklı sedanter bireylerde dominanttaraf etkisinin olmadığını ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KELEŞ, B. S., ŞEKİR, U., GÜR, H. (2022). Sağlıklı sedanter bireylerin dominant ve non-dominant bacak kas reaksiyon zamanı ve propriosepsiyonu. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1, 51–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/628721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Konradsen L, Beynnon BD, Renstrom PA. Proprioception and senso- rimotor control in the functionally unstable ankle. In: Lephart SM, Fu FH, editors. Proprioception and neuromuscular control in joint stability 1st ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2000. p. 237-46
  2. Docherty CL, Arnold BL. Force sense deficits in functionally unstable ankles. J Orthop Res 2008;26:1489-93. [CrossRef] 3. Forkin DM, Koczur C, Battle R, Newton RA. Evaluation of kinesthetic deficits indicative of balance control in gymnasts with unilateral chronic ankle sprains. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996;23:245-50. [CrossRef] 4. Hertel J, Olmsted-Kramer LC. Deficits in time-toboundary mea- sures of postural control with chronic ankle instability. Gait Posture 2007;25:33-9. [CrossRef] 5. McKeon PO, Hertel J. Spatiotemporal postural control deficits are present in those with chronic ankle instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:76. [CrossRef] 6. Mitchell A, Dyson R, Hale T, Abraham C. Biomechanics of ankle instability. Part 2: postural sway-reaction time relationship. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:1522-8. [CrossRef] 7. Hartsell HD, Spaulding SJ. Eccentric/concentric ratios at selected velocities for the invertor and evertor muscles of the chronically unstable ankle. Br J Sports Med 1999;33:255-8. [CrossRef] 8. Sekir U, Yildiz Y, Hazneci B, Ors F, Aydin T. Effect of isokinetic train- ing on strength, functionality and proprioception in athletes with functional ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:654-64. [CrossRef] 9. Konradsen L, Ravn JB. Prolonged peroneal reaction time in ankle instability. Int J Sports Med 1991;12:290-2. [CrossRef] 10. Lofvenberg R, Karrholm J, Sundelin G, Ahlgren O. Prolonged reac- tion time in patients with chronic lateral instability of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 1995;23:414-7. [CrossRef] 11. Mitchell A, Dyson R, Hale T, Abraham C. Biomechanics of ankle instability. Part 1: reaction time to simulated ankle sprain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:1515-21. [CrossRef] 12. Ozdemir RA, Pourmoghaddam A, Paloski WH. Sensorimotor posture control in the blind: Superior ankle proprioceptive acuity does not compensate for vision loss. Gait Posture 2013;38:603-8. [CrossRef] 13. Han KM, Ricard MD. Effects of 4 weeks of elastic-resistance training on ankle-evertor strength and latency. J Sport Rehabil 2011;20:157-73
  3. Henry B, McLoda T, Docherty CL, Schrader J. The effect of plyomet- ric training on peroneal latency. J Sport Rehabil 2010;19:288-300.