SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 1

Bir grup vasküler inme hastasında komorbidite ve kümülatif hastalık değerlendirme skalasının güvenirliği

Comorbidity in a group of vascular stroke patients and the reliability of the cumulative illness rating scale

Demet TEKDÖŞ
Gökşen GÖKŞENOĞLU
Derya BUĞDAYCI
Nurdan PAKER
Pages
9–13
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The patients with stroke had six system problems as a mean in this study

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the reliability of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) and the frequency of comorbidity in stroke.Patients and methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients who had stroke once (25 males, 27 females; mean age 65.6±9.9 years; range 37 to 83 years), admitted to the stroke unit of the rehabilitation hospital between 01.09.2011 and 31.12.2011, were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for the measurement of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability studies.Results: Mean CIRS score was 16±4.4.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The patients with stroke had six system problems as a mean in this study
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the reliability of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) and the frequency of comorbidity in stroke.Patients and methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients who had stroke once (25 males, 27 females; mean age 65.6±9.9 years; range 37 to 83 years), admitted to the stroke unit of the rehabilitation hospital between 01.09.2011 and 31.12.2011, were included in this study. After the first evaluation, three physicians scored the CIRS from the medical records. The same three physicians repeated this process after a one-week interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for the measurement of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability studies.Results: Mean CIRS score was 16±4.4. Mean number of the affected organ systems was 6.8±1.8 . The intraclass correlation coefficients were between 0.97-0.99. The most common chronic conditions associated to stroke were vascular problems, endocrine and metabolic disorders and psychiatric problems.Conclusion: As a result, both the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability results of the CIRS were very good in stroke. The patients with stroke had six system problems as a mean in this study

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada inmede Kümülatif Hastalık Değerlendirme Skalası (KHDS)'nın güvenirliği ve komorbidite sıklığı araştırıldı.Hastalar ve yöntemler: 01.09.2011 - 31.12.2011 tarihleri arasında rehabilitasyon hastanesinin inme ünitesine başvuran bir kez inme geçirmiş olan 52 ardışık hasta (25 erkek, 27 kadın; ort. yaş 65.6±9.9 yıl; dağılım 37-83 yıl) çalışmaya alındı. İlk değerlendirme sonrasında üç doktor KHDS'yi tıbbi kayıtlardan ayrı ayrı puanladı. Bu işlem bir hafta sonra aynı doktorlar tarafından tekrarlandı. Aynı değerlendirmecinin farklı ölçümlerindeki ve farklı değerlendirmeciler arasındaki güvenirlik çalışmaları için sınıf içi korelasyon katsayıları hesaplandı.Bulgular: Ortalama KHDS skoru 16±4.4 idi. Etkilenen organ sistem sayısı ortalama olarak 6.8±1.8 bulundu. Sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı 0.97-0.99 arasında idi. İnmeyle birlikte en sık görülen kronik durumlar vasküler bozukluklar, endokrin ve metabolik bozukluklar ve pisikiyatrik problemlerdi.Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, inmede KHDS'nin hem değerlendirme yapan kişinin farklı ölçümlerindeki hem de farklı değerlendirmeciler arasındaki güvenirliği çok iyi idi. Bu çalışmada inmeli hastalarda ortalama olarak altı sistem problemi ile karşılaşıldı

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKDÖŞ, D., GÖKŞENOĞLU, G., BUĞDAYCI, D., PAKER, N. (2022). Bir grup vasküler inme hastasında komorbidite ve kümülatif hastalık değerlendirme skalasının güvenirliği. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 1, 9–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/628636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, Salisbury C, Roland M. Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:357-63
  2. Taylor AW, Price K, Gill TK, Adams R, Pilkington R, Carrangis N, et al. Multimorbidity - not just an older person's issue. Results from an Australian biomedical study. BMC Public Health 2010;10:718
  3. Britt HC, Harrison CM, Miller GC, Knox SA. Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity in Australia. Med J Aust 2008;189:72-7
  4. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Lapointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:223-8
  5. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10:430-9
  6. Marengoni A, Rizzuto D, Wang HX, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. Patterns of chronic multimorbidity in the elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:225-30
  7. Kirchberger I, Meisinger C, Heier M, Zimmermann AK, Thorand B, Autenrieth CS, et al. Patterns of multimorbidity in the aged population. Results from the KORA-Age study. PLoS One 2012;7:30556
  8. Schäfer I, Hansen H, Schön G, Höfels S, Altiner A, Dahlhaus A, et al. The influence of age, gender and socio-economic status on multimorbidity patterns in primary care. First results from the multicare cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:89
  9. Meisinger C, Döring A, Heier M. Blood pressure and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men and women from the general population: the Monitoring Trends and Determinants on Cardiovascular Diseases/Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg Cohort Study. J Hypertens 2008;26:1809-15
  10. Long AN, Dagogo-Jack S. Comorbidities of diabetes and hypertension: mechanisms and approach to target organ protection. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011;13:244-51
  11. Smith SM, O'Dowd T. Chronic diseases: what happens when they come in multiples? Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:268-70
  12. Huntley AL, Johnson R, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Salisbury C. Measures of multimorbidity and morbidity burden for use in primary care and community settings: a systematic review and guide. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:134-41
  13. Linn BS, Linn MW, Gurel L. Cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 1968;16:622-6
  14. Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR, Mazumdar S, Stack JA, Rifai AH, et al. Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulat