Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3

The investigation of the role of the facet joint angle in the development of L5-S1 spondylolysis in young men

Pages
253–258
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The frequency of facet tropism and the difference between right and left facet joint angles for all three levels were significantly higher in the spondylolysis group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate facet tropism in younger patients with lumbar spondylolysis and to investigate the role of facet tropism in the development of spondylolysis.Patients and methods: Between February 2013 and December 2015, a total of 102 male patients with bilateral L5 pars defect including 53 with spondylolysis and 49 control subjects were included in this case-control study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The facet joint angles were measured bilaterally and axially at the level of L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1 using computed tomography (CT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The frequency of facet tropism and the difference between right and left facet joint angles for all three levels were significantly higher in the spondylolysis group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate facet tropism in younger patients with lumbar spondylolysis and to investigate the role of facet tropism in the development of spondylolysis.Patients and methods: Between February 2013 and December 2015, a total of 102 male patients with bilateral L5 pars defect including 53 with spondylolysis and 49 control subjects were included in this case-control study. The facet joint angles were measured bilaterally and axially at the level of L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1 using computed tomography (CT). The classification was made as follows: A difference between two reciprocal facet joint angles of 12° indicated severe tropism.Results: A total of 612 angles including 318 facet joint angles from 53 patients with spondylolysis and 294 facet joint angles from 49 control subjects were measured. L3-4 measurements in the control group showed no tropism in 87.8% (n=43), moderate tropism in 12.2% (n=6), and severe tropism in 0% (n=0). L4-5 measurements in control group showed no tropism in 79.6% (n=39), moderate tropism in 20.4% (n=10), and severe tropism in 0% (n=0). L5-S1 measurements in the control group showed no tropism in 69.4% (n=34), moderate tropism in 28.6% (n=14), and severe tropism in 2.0% (n=1). The mean facet joint angles in the spondylosis group were 32.9±5.1°, 37.5±5.4°, and 41.2±7.8° at the levels of L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1, respectively. The mean facet joint angles of the control group were 33.2±5.7°, 39.7±4.9°, and 42.2±4.9° at the levels of L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1, respectively, indicating no significant difference between the right and left mean facet joint angles between the groups (p>0.05). The frequency of facet tropism and the difference between right and left facet joint angles for all three levels were significantly higher in the spondylolysis group (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜZ, B., TOK, F., ATABEY, C., SARI, E., CÜCE, F., EROĞLU, A. (2022). The investigation of the role of the facet joint angle in the development of L5-S1 spondylolysis in young men. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3, 253–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/628634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kalichman L, Guermazi A, Li L, Hunter DJ, Suri P. Facet orientation and tropism: associations with spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23:101-5
  2. Masharawi YM, Alperovitch-Najenson D, Steinberg N, Dar G, Peleg S, Rothschild B, et al. Lumbar facet orientation in spondylolysis: a skeletal study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:176-80
  3. Wang H, Zhou Y. Facet tropism: possible role in the pathology of lumbar disc herniation in adolescents. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016;18:111-5
  4. Matsuo Y, Kaito T, Iwasaki M, Sugiura T, Fujimori T, Nagamoto Y, et al. 3D morphometric analysis of laminae and facet joints in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Mod Rheumatol 2015;25:756-60
  5. Schleich C, Müller-Lutz A, Blum K, Boos J, Bittersohl B, Schmitt B, et al. Facet tropism and facet joint orientation: risk factors for the development of early biochemical alterations of lumbar intervertebral discs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016;24:1761-8
  6. Ward CV, Latimer B. Human evolution and the development of spondylolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1808-14
  7. Don AS, Robertson PA. Facet joint orientation in spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:112-5
  8. Farfan HF, Sullivan JD. The relation of facet orientation to intervertebral disc failure. Can J Surg 1967;10:179-85
  9. Jaumard NV, Welch WC, Winkelstein BA. Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions. J Biomech Eng 2011;133:071010
  10. Kim HJ, Kang KT, Son J, Lee CK, Chang BS, Yeom JS. The influence of facet joint orientation and tropism on the stress at the adjacent segment after lumbar fusion surgery: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 2015;15:1841-7
  11. Wang H, Zhang Z, Zhou Y. Irregular Alteration of Facet Orientation in Lumbar Segments: Possible Role in Pathology of Lumbar Disc Herniation in Adolescents. World Neurosurg 2016;86:321-7
  12. Wang J, Yang X. Age-related changes in the orientation of lumbar facet joints. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:596-8
  13. Do DH, Taghavi CE, Fong W, Kong MH, Morishita Y, Wang JC. The relationship between degree of facet tropism and amount of dynamic disc bulge in lumbar spine of patients symptomatic for low back pain. Eur Spine J 2011;20:71-8
  14. Pichaisak W, Chotiyarnwong C, Chotiyarnwong P. Facet joint orientation and tropism in lumbar degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis. J Med Assoc Thai 2015;98:373-9
  15. Noren R, Trafimow J, Andersson GB, Huckman MS. The role o