Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 1

Omurilik hasarlı hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ve rehabilitasyon sonrası fonksiyonel sonuçları

Demographic and clinical profile and functional outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury after rehabilitation

Pages
66–71
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Functional independence measure motor scores showed significant improvements at discharge (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to analyze the demographic and clinical properties of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to investigate the functional outcomes after rehabilitation.Patients and methods: In this retrospective and descriptive study, we investigated a total of 118 SCI patients (74 males, 44 females; mean age 41±16 years; range 13 to 74 years) with full records who were admitted to our rehabilitation program between January 2005 and December 2010.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Characteristic features of the patients’, frequency of complications, and functional and neurological recovery were evaluated.Results: Of the patients, 70% were tetraplegic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Functional independence measure motor scores showed significant improvements at discharge (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to analyze the demographic and clinical properties of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to investigate the functional outcomes after rehabilitation.Patients and methods: In this retrospective and descriptive study, we investigated a total of 118 SCI patients (74 males, 44 females; mean age 41±16 years; range 13 to 74 years) with full records who were admitted to our rehabilitation program between January 2005 and December 2010. Demographic characteristics of the patients, etiological factors, time since injury, length of hospital stay, level of injury, as assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale and functional status, as assessed by the Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) on admission and discharge were analyzed. Complications related to SCI were also noted. Characteristic features of the patients’, frequency of complications, and functional and neurological recovery were evaluated.Results: Of the patients, 70% were tetraplegic. The median time since injury was four months (IQR: 1 to 15 months), while the median length of stay was 76 days (IQR: 46 to 104 days). Four of 47 patients (8%) with Grade A (complete) according to the ASIA Impairment Scale on admission progressed to Grade B on discharge. Functional independence measure motor scores showed significant improvements at discharge (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada omurilik yaralanmalı (OY) hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri incelendi ve rehabilitasyon sonrasında fonksiyonel sonuçlar araştırıldı.Hastalar ve yöntemler: Bu retrospektif ve tanımlayıcı çalışmada Ocak 2005 - Aralık 2010 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde rehabilitasyon programına alınmış, kayıtları eksiksiz olan toplam 118 OY'li hasta (74 erkek, 44 kadın; ort. yaş 41±16 yıl; dağılım 13-74 yıl) incelendi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, etyolojik faktörler, yaralanma sonrası geçen süre, hastanede yatış süresi, Amerikan Omurilik Derneği (ASIA) Bozukluk Ölçeği ile değerlendirilen yaralanma seviyesi ve İşlevsel Bağımsızlık Ölçütü (FIMTM) ile değerlendirilen fonksiyonel statü hastaneye yatış ve taburculuk sırasında analiz edildi. Omurilik yaralanmasına bağlı komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. Hastaların karakteristik özellikleri, komplikasyonların görülme sıklığı ve fonksiyonel ve nörolojik iyileşme düzeyleri değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Hastaların %70'i tetraplejik idi. Yaralanma sonrası geçen medyan süre dört ay (IQR: 1-15 ay) iken, medyan hastanede yatış süresi 76 gün idi. ASIA Bozukluk Ölçeğine göre yatışta Evre A (komplet) olan 47 hastadan dördü (%8) Evre B'ye ilerledi. İşlevsel Bağımsızlık Ölçütü motor skorları taburculukta anlamlı iyileşme gösterdi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, H., TUR, B. S., KUTLAY, Ş., GÜNEŞ, S., AYTÜR, Y. K., KÜÇÜKDEVECİ, A. A., GÜNEŞ, N. (2022). Omurilik hasarlı hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ve rehabilitasyon sonrası fonksiyonel sonuçları. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 1, 66–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/628624

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord 2006;44:523-9
  2. Kirshblum SC, Memmo P, Kim N, Campagnolo D, Millis S. Comparison of the revised 2000 American Spinal Injury Association classification standards with the 1996 guidelines. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:502-5
  3. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987;1:6-18
  4. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:84-9
  5. Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:311-9
  6. Kurtzke JF. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 1975;48:163-236. 7. van Asbeck FW, Post MW, Pangalila RF. An epidemiological description of spinal cord injuries in The Netherlands in 1994. Spinal Cord 2000;38:420-4
  7. Surkin J, Gilbert BJ, Harkey HL, Sniezek J, Currier M. Spinal cord injury in Mississippi. Findings and evaluation, 1992-1994. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:716-21
  8. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center1. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med 2013;36:1-2
  9. McKinley WO, Seel RT, Hardman JT. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: incidence, epidemiology, and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:619-23
  10. Citterio A, Franceschini M, Spizzichino L, Reggio A, Rossi B, Stampacchia G. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: an Italian survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1483-7
  11. Khazaeipour Z, Norouzi-Javidan A, Kaveh M, Khanzadeh Mehrabani F, Kazazi E, Emami-Razavi SH. Psychosocial outcomes following spinal cord injury in Iran. J Spinal Cord Med 2014;37:338-45
  12. Armstrong JC, Nichols BE, Wilson JM, Cosico RA, Shanks L. Spinal cord injury in the emergency context: review of program outcomes of a spinal cord injury rehabilitation program in Sri Lanka. Confl Health 2014;8:4
  13. Cosar SN, Yemisci OU, Oztop P, Cetin N, Sarifakioglu B, Yalbuzdag SA, et al. Demographic characteristics after traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective comparison study. Spinal Cord 2010;48:862-6
  14. Ng YS, Jung H, Tay SS, Bok CW, Chiong Y, Lim PA. Results from a prospective acute inpatient rehabilitation database: clinical characteristics and functional outcomes