SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Çocuk Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Perceived Stigmatization of Families of Children with Feeding Disorders

Yeme Sorunu Tanısı Alan Çocukların Ailelerinin Damgalanmışlık (Stigma) Algısı

E. Bahar BİNGÖLER PEKCİCİ
Ezgi ÖZALP AKIN
Funda AKPINAR
Pages
101–106
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe this study will stimulate asking the families about perceived stigmatization while evaluating feeding disorders and the provide guidance for the treatment approach when working with families for perceived stigmatization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Feelings of perceived stigmatization of families of children with feeding disorders in infancy and early childhood is not known according to the existing literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the families of children diagnosed with feeding disorders aged 0-42 months were evaluated for perceived stigmatization with the Expanded Guide for Monitoring Child Development (Exp-GMCD).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe this study will stimulate asking the families about perceived stigmatization while evaluating feeding disorders and the provide guidance for the treatment approach when working with families for perceived stigmatization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Damgalanma · Stigma

Abstract

Objective: Feelings of perceived stigmatization of families of children with feeding disorders in infancy and early childhood is not known according to the existing literature. The objective of this study was to determine the perceived stigmatization of families and which risk factors and sociodemografic characteristics are related to perceived stigmatization. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the families of children diagnosed with feeding disorders aged 0-42 months were evaluated for perceived stigmatization with the Expanded Guide for Monitoring Child Development (Exp-GMCD). The Student t, Pearson Chi-square and Fisher-exact tests were used to determine the related factors and logistic regression anaysis was used to find out the effects of related factors on perceived stigmatization Results: Of the 67 caregivers of children with feeding disorders used as the sample, 22 families (33%) expressed perceived stigmatization on the Exp-GMCD. Female gender of the child (OR:3.3, 95% CI:1.1-10, p= 0,029), mother’s feelings of depression (OR:3.2, 95% CI:1-10, p=0.041) and paternal education under high school (OR:5.2, 95% CI:1.1- 23.5, p=0.05) were found to be statistically significantly related to perceived stigmatization of the families. In multiple logistic regression analysis, paternal education (OR:7.6, 95% CI:1.4-4) and female gender of the child (OR:4.4, 95% CI:1.2-15.4) were found to be related to perceived stigmatization of the families. p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 2.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 12.1px; font: 9.0px Helvetica; color: #221e1f} p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 2.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 9.1px; font: 9.0px Helvetica; color: #221e1f} span.s1 {font: 12.0px Helvetica; color: #000000} Conclusion: This study shows that one third of the families of children with feeding disorders express perceived stigmatization. We believe this study will stimulate asking the families about perceived stigmatization while evaluating feeding disorders and the provide guidance for the treatment approach when working with families for perceived stigmatization.

Özet

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 2.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 12.1px; font: 9.0px Helvetica; color: #221e1f} p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 2.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 9.1px; font: 9.0px Helvetica; color: #221e1f} span.s1 {font: 12.0px Helvetica; color: #000000} Amaç: Bebeklik ve erken çocukluk döneminde yeme sorunu olan çocukların ailelerinin damgalanmışlık algısı (stigma) hissedip hissetmedikleri alanyazında bilinmemektedir. Araştırmada bebeklik ve erken çocukluk döneminde yeme sorunu tanısı alan çocukların ailelerinin kendilerini ne oranda damgalanmış hissettiğinin ve ailelerin damgalanma algılarının risk etmenleri ve sosyodemografik özellikler ilişkisinin belirlenmesi incelenmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kesitsel ve gözlemsel bir desenle yapılan araştırmada yeme sorunu tanısı alan 0-42 aylık çocukların ailelerinin damgalanma algısı Genişletilmiş Gelişimi İzleme Destekleme Rehberi (G-GİDR) ile değerlendirilmiştir. İlişkili etmenlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla Student- t testi, Pearson Ki-Kare ya da Fisher-exact testi kullanılmış, anlamlı ilişki saptanan etmenlerin damgalanma algısına olan etkilerini araştırmak için çoklu lojistik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Örneklemi oluşturan 67 çocuğun ailelerinin 22’si (%33) G-GİDR’de damgalanma algısı bildirmişlerdir. Ailenin damgalanma algısı ile çocuğun kız olması (OR:3.3, %95 GA:1.1-10, p=0.029), ailenin annede yılgınlık-bitkinlik-depresyon bildirmesi (OR:3.2, %95GA:1-10, p=0.041), baba eğitim düzeyinin lisenin altında olması (OR:5.2, %95 GA:1.1-23.5, p=0.05) arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur. Çoklu lojistik regresyon analizinde ailelerin damgalanma algısının babanın eğitim düzeyi lise ve altında (OR:7.6, %95 GA:1.4-4) ve çocuğun kız olması (OR:4.4, %95 GA:1.2-15.4) ile ilişkisi bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Araştırma, yeme sorunu tanısı alan çocukların ailelerinin üçte birinin damgalanma algısı bildirdiğini göstermektedir. Araştırmamızın yeme sorunu tanısı alan çocukların değerlendirmelerinde ailenin damgalanma algısının sorgulanması ve tedavide bu algı konusunda aileler ile çalışılması konusundaki yaklaşımlara ışık tutması umulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKCİCİ, E. B. B., AKIN, E. Ö., AKPINAR, F. (2022). Perceived Stigmatization of Families of Children with Feeding Disorders. Türkiye Çocuk Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 101–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/627176

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kerzner B, Milano K, MacLean WC Jr, Berall G, Stuart S, Chatoor I. A practical approach to classifying and managing feeding difficulties. Pediatrics 2015;135:344-53
  2. Doğan DG, Ertem İÖ. Bebeklik ve erken çocukluk döneminde yeme sorunları. Ertem İ (ed). Gelişimsel Pediatri, Ankara: Antıp, 2005: 227-46
  3. Chatoor I. Feeding disorders in infants and toddlers: Diagnosis and treatment. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2002;11:163-83
  4. American Psychiatric Publishing. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013
  5. Zero to Three. DC:0-3R: Diagnostic classification of mental health and developmental disorders of infancy and early childhood. Washington, D.C: Zero To Three Press, 2005
  6. Manikam R, Perman JA. Pediatric feeding disorders. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000;30:34-46
  7. Phalen JA. Managing feeding problems and feeding disorders. Pediatr Rev 2013;34:549-57
  8. Borowitz KC, Borowitz SM. Feeding problems in ınfants and children: Assessment and etiology. Pediatr Clin North Am 2018;65:59-72
  9. O’Brien LM, Heycock EG, Hanna M, Jones PW, Cox JL. Postnatal depression and faltering growth: A community study. Pediatrics 2004;113:1242-7
  10. Haycraft E, Farrow C, Blissett J. Maternal symptoms of depression are related to observations of controlling feeding practices in mothers of young children. J Fam Psychol 2013;27:159-64
  11. Patel V, Rahman A, Jacob KS, Hughes M. Effect of maternal mental health on infant growth in low income countries: New evidence from South Asia. BMJ 2004;328:820-3
  12. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological models of human development. In: International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol: 3, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. Reprinted in: Gauvain, M & Cole M (eds) Readings on the development of children. 2nd ed. New York: Freeman, 1993:37- 43
  13. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1963: 5-37
  14. Ali A, Hassiotis A, Strydom A, King M. Self stigma in people with intellectual disabilities and courtesy stigma in family caregivers: A systematic review. Res Dev Disabil 2012;33:2122-40
  15. Werner S, Shulman C. Subjective well-being among family caregivers of individuals with developmental disabilities: The role of affiliate stigma and psychosocial moderating variables. Res Dev Disabil 2013; 34:4103–14
  16. Caslini M, Crocamo C, Dakanalis A, Tremolada M, Clerici M, Carrà G. Stigmatizing Attitudes and Beliefs About Anorexia and B