Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE

Pages
12–24
Publication Date
2014-03-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Supportive leadership and organizational justice explain nearly two thirds of perception of trust to administrator, nearly one third of perception of trust in colleagues and nearly one fifth of perception of trust in stakeholders.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz This paper examined the relationships between the school administrators’ leadership behavior and teachers’ perceptions of organizational trust, and organizational justice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the survey model study consists of 271 high school teachers in the province of Kutahya in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Supportive leadership and organizational justice explain nearly two thirds of perception of trust to administrator, nearly one third of perception of trust in colleagues and nearly one fifth of perception of trust in stakeholders.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Leadership · organizational justice · organizational trust

Özet

Öz This paper examined the relationships between the school administrators’ leadership behavior and teachers’ perceptions of organizational trust, and organizational justice. The sample of the survey model study consists of 271 high school teachers in the province of Kutahya in Turkey. Data is collected by “Organizational Trust Scale”, “Organizational Justice Scale” and “Leadership Behavior Scale”. Data is analyzed through descriptive statistics and Regression Analysis. The research findings show that teachers have positive perceptions about organizational trust, organizational justice and school administrators’ leadership behaviors. There is a high correlation between school administrators’ supportive leadership behaviors and teachers’ perceptions of organizational justice and perceptions of trust to administrator. There is a moderate positive correlation between school administrators’ supportive leadership behaviors and teachers’ perceptions of organizational justice and trust in colleagues and trust in stakeholders. Supportive leadership and organizational justice are significant predictors of teachers’ perceptions of organizational trust. Supportive leadership and organizational justice explain nearly two thirds of perception of trust to administrator, nearly one third of perception of trust in colleagues and nearly one fifth of perception of trust in stakeholders.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, K., ALTINKURT, Y. (2014). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS AND ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST AND ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 12–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/6268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M, (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.
  2. Altınkurt, Y. (2010). Örgütsel adalet (Edt: H. B. Memduhoğlu & K. Yılmaz), Yönetimde yeni yaklaşımlar (pp. 275-290), Ankara:
  3. Pegem A. Arslan, M. M. (2009). Technical and industry vocational high school teachers’ organizational trust perceptions. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5(2), 274-288
  4. Arslantaş, C. C., & Pekdemir, I. (2007). Dönüşümcü liderlik, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve örgütsel adalet arasındaki ilişkileri belirlemeye yönelik görgül bir araştırma [An empirical study on the associations among transformational leadership, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational justice]. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 261–286.
  5. Asunakutlu, T. (2007). Güven, kültür ve örgütsel yansımaları, (Edt: R. Erdem & C. Ş. Çukur). Kültürel bağlamda yönetsel-örgütsel davranış (pp. 231–265), Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  6. Atalay, İ. (2005). Örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel adalet. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi,
  7. Afyonkarahisar. Balay, R. (2000). Yönetici ve öğretmenlerde örgütsel bağlılık, Ankara:
  8. Nobel. Başaran, İ. E. (1992). Yönetimde insan ilişkileri. Ankara:
  9. Kadıoğlu. Bennis, W. (1999). Bir lider olabilmek. (Çev.: Umut Tektöz), İstanbul: Sistem. Beugré, C. D. (2002). Understanding organizational justice and its impact on managing employees: An African perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(7), 1091–1104.
  10. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2003).
  11. Eğitim yönetiminde teori ve uygulama, Ankara:
  12. Pegem A. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı, Ankara:
  13. Pegem A. Çankaya, İ. H., & Aküzüm, C. (2010). İlköğretim okullarında öğretmenlerin iletişim kurma düzeyleri ile yöneticilerinin destekleyici liderlik rolleri arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between teachers’ communication competence and managers’ supportive leadership roles in primary school]. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 49–57.
  14. Çelik, V. (2003). Eğitimsel liderlik. Ankara:
  15. Pegem A. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). Th e role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.
  16. Çokluk-Bökeoğlu, Ö., & Yılmaz, K. (2008). İlköğretim okullarında örgütsel güven hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 14(54), 211-233.
  17. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon,