SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Family medicine approach to the patients with chronic low back pain: How effective is it?

Kronik bel ağrısı olan hastalara aile hekimliği yaklaşımı: Ne kadar etkili?

Vildan MEVSİM
İpek TANYILDIZI
Pages
75–83
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: In study group, exercise adaptation (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Treatment of back pain with biopsychosocial treatment and multidisciplinary approach was used to identify the change in pain, physical disability, quality of life and depression levels in chronic idiopathic low back pain (CIBP) patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Randomised 30 patients of CIBP as study and control, were followed for six months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: In study group, exercise adaptation (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Treatment of back pain with biopsychosocial treatment and multidisciplinary approach was used to identify the change in pain, physical disability, quality of life and depression levels in chronic idiopathic low back pain (CIBP) patients. Methods: Randomised 30 patients of CIBP as study and control, were followed for six months. Family medicine principles applied to the study group, no intervention was used in control group. The alteration of life quality, depression, pain and physical disability of patients were evaluated by SF-36 life quality index, Beck depression inventory, visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index. Results: In study group, exercise adaptation (p

Özet

Amaç: Kronik idiyopatik bel ağrısı (KİBA) olan hastaların biyopsikososyal ve multidisipliner yaklaşım ile tedavileri sonucunda ağrı, fiziksel bağımlılık, hayat kalitesi ve depresyon düzeylerindeki değişimin saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: KİBA olan 30 hasta randomize edilerek çalışma ve kontrol grubuna ayrılmış ve altı ay takip edilmişlerdir. Çalışma grubu hastalarına aile hekimliği ilkeleri uygulanmış, kontrol grubuna ek müdahalede bulunulmamıştır. Hastaların takipleri sonucunda, hayat kalitelerindeki, depresyon, ağrı ve fiziksel bağımlılık düzeylerindeki değişim; SF 36 hayat kalitesi ölçeği, Beck depresyon envanteri, Vizüel analog skalası ve Oswestry engellilik indeksi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışma grubundaki hastaların egzersiz uyumlarının (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MEVSİM, V., TANYILDIZI, İ. (2022). Family medicine approach to the patients with chronic low back pain: How effective is it?. Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 75–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/626753

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Pincus T, Vlaeyen JW, Kendall NA, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychosocial factors in low back pain. Spine 2002; 27 (5): E133-E138. Diamond S, Borenstein D. Chonic low back pain in a working age adult. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006; 20 (4): 707-20.
  2. Van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C. Low back pain. Best Pract Clin Rheumatol 2002; 16 (5): 761-75.
  3. Deyo R, Weinstein J. Primary care, low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001; 344(5): 363-70. 5. Lambeek LC, Bosmans JE, Van Royen BJ, et al. Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 341: c6414. Van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes B. Exercise therapy for low back pain. Spine 2000; 25 (21): 2784-96.
  4. Van Tulder M, Koes B. Low back pain. Am Fam Physician 2002; 65 (5): 925-8.
  5. Abraham I, Killackey B. Lack of evidence based research for low back pain. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1442-4.
  6. Geisser ME, Wiggert EA, Haig AJ, Colwell MO. A randomized controlled trial of manual therapy and specific adjuvant exercise for chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain 2005; 21(6): 463-70.
  7. Kool JP, Oesch PR, Bachmann S, et al. Increasing days at work using function-centered rehabilitation in nonacute nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 857-64.
  8. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010; 24 (6): 769-81.
  9. Descarreaux M, Normand M, Laurencelle L, Dugas C. Evaluation of a specific home exercise program for low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002; 25: 497-503.
  10. Giesecke T, Gracely R, Grant M, et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arteritis and Arteritis 2004; 50(2): 613-23. Helfgott S. Sensible approach to low back pain. Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases 2001; 50(3): 1-4.
  11. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000; 84(1): 95-103.
  12. Koes BW, Van Tulder M, Lin CW, et al. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 2010; 19(12): 2075-94.
  13. Linton SJ, Boersma K, Jansson M, Svärd L, Botvalde M. The effects of cognitive-behavioral and physical therapy preventive inter- ventions on pain-related sick leave. Clin J Pain 2005; 21(2): 109-19.
  14. Maiers MJ, Westrom KK, Legendre CG, Bronfort G. Integrative care for the management of low back pain. BMC Health Serv