Journals / Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire

Geleneksel ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Sağlık İnanış Ölçeğinin Türkçe Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Pages
34–39
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: According to the results of the study, “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire- Turkish Form” is an appropriate and sufficient scale to be used to measure the attitudes/beliefs of fifth and sixth-grade students in the medical schools about traditional and complementary medicine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aims to translate the “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire” which was developed by Lie and Boker into Turkish, and to conduct a validity and reliability study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study was conducted with 155 students studying in the 5th and 6th terms of the faculties of medicine in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: According to the results of the study, “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire- Turkish Form” is an appropriate and sufficient scale to be used to measure the attitudes/beliefs of fifth and sixth-grade students in the medical schools about traditional and complementary medicine.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to translate the “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire” which was developed by Lie and Boker into Turkish, and to conduct a validity and reliability study. Methods: This study was conducted with 155 students studying in the 5th and 6th terms of the faculties of medicine in Ankara. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed in the study. The validity of the scale was measured with by the “validity coefficient” and its reliability by the “Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient”. Comparisons were made with the Complementary, Alternative and Traditional Medicine Attitude Scale. Results: A total of 155 students, 74 male (47.7%) and 81 female (52.3%), were included in the study. Among them, 108 (69.7%) were 5th term, and 47 (30.3%) were 6th term students. In our study, the total reliability alpha coefficient of the “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire- Turkish Form” was found to be 0.833. To measure the validity of the questionnaire, firstly, the correlation between each item of the “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire-Turkish Form” separately and the total score of the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Attitude Scale was calculated. Secondly, the correlation between the total score of the “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire- Turkish Form” scale and the total score of the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Attitude Scale was calculated. A significant correlation was found between the two scales at a significance level of 0.05. Conclusion: According to the results of the study, “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire- Turkish Form” is an appropriate and sufficient scale to be used to measure the attitudes/beliefs of fifth and sixth-grade students in the medical schools about traditional and complementary medicine. For this reason, it can be used as a data collection tool in shaping medical education and health policies.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, tıp öğrencilerinin geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp konusundaki tutum/ inançlarını ölçmek için Lie ve Boker tarafından geliştirilmiş olan “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire”in Türkçeye çevrilmesi, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmasının yapılmasıdır. Yöntem: Bu çalışma, Ankara’daki tıp fakültelerinde, 5. ve 6. dönemde eğitim-öğretim gören 155 öğrenci ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin geçerliği “geçerlik katsayısı”, güvenirliği ise “Cronbach alfa güvenirlik katsayısı” ile değerlendirilmiştir. Karşılaştırmalar, Tamamlayıcı, Alternatif ve Geleneksel Tıp Tutum Ölçeği ile yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 74’ü erkek (%47,7), 81’i kadın (%52,3), toplam 155 öğrenci dâhil edildi. Çalışmaya alınan öğrencilerinden 108’i 5. (%69,7), 47’si (%30,3) 6. dönem öğrencisi idi. Çalışmamızda, “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire- Türkçe Formu” ölçeğinin toplam güvenirlik alfa katsayısı 0,833 olarak bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin geçerliğini ölçmek için ilk olarak “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire-Türkçe Formu” ölçeğinin her başlığının ayrı ayrı Geleneksel ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Tutum Ölçeği toplam skoruyla aralarındaki korelasyon hesaplandı. İkinci olarak, toplam “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire-Türkçe Formu” ölçeği skoruyla toplam Geleneksel ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Tutum Ölçeği skorunun korelasyonu hesaplandı. İki ölçek arasında 0.05 anlamlılık düzeyinde anlamlı korelasyon bulundu. Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre, “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire-Türkçe Formu” ölçeği 5. ve 6. sınıf tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp konusundaki tutum/inançlarını ölçmek için kullanılabilecek uygun ve yeterli bir ölçektir. Bu nedenle tıp eğitimi ve sağlık politikalarının toplumun değerlerine ve gereksinimlerine göre şekillendirilmesinde, bir veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRPELİOĞLU, S., USLU, F., EMİROĞLU, C., AYPAK, C. (2022). Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire. Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 34–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/626642

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Health W, Geneva O. National Policy on Traditional Medicine and Regulation of Herbal Medicines Report of a WHO Global Survey. 2005 2. Şahin S. An overview of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. Türk Aile Hekim Derg. 2017
  2. 21(4):159-162. doi:10.15511/tahd.17.00459 3. Posadzki P, Watson LK, Alotaibi A, Ernst E. Prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (cam) by patients/consumers in the uk: Systematic review of surveys. Clin Med J R Coll Physicians London. 2013
  3. 13(2):126- 131. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.13-2-126 4. WHO | WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014- 2023. WHO. 2015. http://www.who.int/medicines/ publications/traditional/trm_strategy14_23/en/. Accessed May 20, 2021 5. Ashraf M, Saeed H, Saleem Z, et al. A cross-sectional assessment of knowledge, attitudes and self-perceived effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine among pharmacy and non-pharmacy university students. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019
  4. 19(1):95. doi:10.1186/s12906-019-2503-y 6. Astin JA, Marie A, Pelletier KR, Hansen E, Haskell WL. A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1998
  5. 158(21):2303-2310. doi:10.1001/ archinte.158.21.2303 7. McFadden KL, Hernandez TD, Ito TA. Attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine infl uence its use, EXPLORE November/December 2010, Vol. 6, No. 6, p:380-388 8. Kara MA. Sparing Space for Weed: On Traditional Medicine and Patient-Physician Relationship. Anadolu Klin Tıp Bilim Derg. 2019
  6. 24(1):32-37. doi:10.21673/ anadoluklin.462893 9. Ünal M, Dağdeviren HN. Geleneksel ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Yöntemleri. Euras J Fam Med. 2019
  7. 8(1):1-9. doi:10.33880/ejfm.2019080101 10. Köse E, Ekerbiçer HÇ, Erkorkmaz Ü, Complementary, Alternative and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale: Turkish Validity Reliability Study, Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, 2018, Cilt 8, Sayı 4, Sayfalar 726 – 736, https://dx.doi. org/10.31832/smj.478148 11. Lie, D., Boker, J. Development and validation of the CAM Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ) and CAM use and attitudes amongst medical students. BMC Med Educ 4, 2 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-4-2 12. D E Beaton, C Bombardier, F Guillemin, M B Ferraz. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15
  8. 25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632- 200012150-00014 13. Çakmur H. Araştırmalarda Ölçme-Güvenilirlik-Geçerlilik [Measurement-Reliability-Validity in Re