Journals / Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14

Need for ideal judge and judicial ethics

İdeal hâkim ihtiyacı ve yargı etiği

Pages
691–730
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The basic goal of having these principles is to maintain public confidence in judiciary by conducting judicial processes fair, inpartial and efficient manner.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Having Identifying ethical principles for judiciary is one of the main priorities for all legal sistems lately.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite the fact that Bangalor ve Budapest Principles had been identified in global scale, it is hard to say that these principles have thoroughly adopted in domesitic level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The basic goal of having these principles is to maintain public confidence in judiciary by conducting judicial processes fair, inpartial and efficient manner.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Having Identifying ethical principles for judiciary is one of the main priorities for all legal sistems lately. Despite the fact that Bangalor ve Budapest Principles had been identified in global scale, it is hard to say that these principles have thoroughly adopted in domesitic level. Therefore, determining some rules as ethical principles for Turkish Judiciary in line with global standarts and Turkish legal traditions is required. The basic goal of having these principles is to maintain public confidence in judiciary by conducting judicial processes fair, inpartial and efficient manner.

Özet

Yargı için etik ilkelerin belirlenmesi, son yıllarda bütün hukuk sistemleri için en önemli önceliklerden birisidir. Küresel bazda, Bangalor ve Budapeşte ilkeleri gibi bazı temel ilke ve kurallar belirlenmesine rağmen iç hukukta bu ilkelerin tam anlamıyla benimsendiğinden bahsetmek zordur. Bu nedenle, diğer ülkelerde olduğu gibi ülkemizde de hem evrensel değerlere hem de Türk gelenek ve göreneklerine uygun etik ilkelerin belirlenmesi bir ihtiyaç olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu ilkelerin belirlenmesindeki temel amaç, yargısal süreçlerin adil, tarafsız ve etkili bir şekilde yürütülmesi yoluyla adalete olan güvenin korunmasıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, M. (2022). Need for ideal judge and judicial ethics. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14, 691–730. https://ajindex.com/articles/626509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abraham Abramovskiy, Jonathan I. Edelsteiny: Prosecuting Judges for Ethical Violations: Are Criminal Sanctions Constitutional and Prudent, or Do They Constitute a Threat to Judicial Independence?,Fordham Urban Law Journal, vol 33 2006. Alexander R. Green: Implicit Bias Among Physicians And Its Prediction Of Thrombolysis Decisions For Black And White Patients, 22 J.Gen. Internal Med. 1231 (2007).
  2. Astle, Ruth S.: "Integrity and Ethics in Western Adjudicatory Systems: Toward a Standard" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. Paper 14. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/theses/14, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nin 25 Eylül 2001 tarihli Şahiner-Türkiye Davası, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nin Gregory- İngiltere davası, (1997) 25 EHRR 577, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nin 09/01/2013 tarihli Oleksandr – Ukrayna kararı, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx,
  3. Benjamin B. Strawn, Do Judicial Ethics Canons Affect Perceptions of Judicial Impartiality?, Boston University Law Review, Vol. 88:, 2008. Bruce A. Green: May Judges Attend Privately Funded Educational Programs? Should Judicial Education be Privatized?: Questions of Judicial Ethics and Policy, Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol.29, Iss.3, 2001
  4. Charles Fried, A: Mediation on the First Principles of Judicial Ethics, Hostra Law Review,2004, vol. 32 Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Counduct, http://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/publications_unodc_commentar y-e.pdf, Deanell Reece Tacha: Independence of the Judiciary for the Third Century, 46 Mercer Law Review, (1995)
  5. Dursun, Hasan: Erkler Ayrılığı ve Yargıç Bağımsızlığı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, sayı 80, 2009. Emily M. Janoski-Haehlen: The Courts Are All A 'Twitter': The Implications of Social Media Use in the Courts, 46 Val. U. L. Rev. 43, (2011) Erwin Chemerinsky: Is İt the Siren’s Call?:Judge and Free Speech While Cases Are Pending,Loyola Of Los Angeles Law Review,1995, vol 28. Geyh, Charles G.: "Rescuing Judicial Accountability from the Realm of Political Rhetoric"(2006).Faculty Publications.Paper 303.,http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/303 Georey P. Miller: BadJudges,bepress Legal Series,paper 185, 2004,http://law.bepress.com
  6. Gönenç, Levent: Yargının Bağımsızlığı ve Tarafsızlığı,TEPAV Anayasa Çalışma Metinleri,2011.
  7. Günday, Metin: İdare Hukuku, İmaj Yayınevi, Ankara, 2004. Howard T. Markey: A Need fo