Journals / Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16

The non-contractual liability of veterinary

Veteriner hekimin sözleşme dışı sorumluluğu

Pages
319–335
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While analyzing general liability reasons of veterinaries, it is first explicated under which circumstances would a veterinary be liable according to a contract and from which type or types of contracts would this liability incur.After that, the liability of veterinary that arise from tort, acting without authority and veterinary s strict liability that can arise from the animal owners liability or risk liability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the term of animal and its legal character is analyzed by mentioning the legislations in Turkey, other law systems and international regulations; then the general liability reasons that ground on therapies and treatments of veterinaries are reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the term of animal and its legal character is analyzed by mentioning the legislations in Turkey, other law systems and international regulations; then the general liability reasons that ground on therapies and treatments of veterinaries are reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While analyzing general liability reasons of veterinaries, it is first explicated under which circumstances would a veterinary be liable according to a contract and from which type or types of contracts would this liability incur.After that, the liability of veterinary that arise from tort, acting without authority and veterinary s strict liability that can arise from the animal owners liability or risk liability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the term of animal and its legal character is analyzed by mentioning the legislations in Turkey, other law systems and international regulations; then the general liability reasons that ground on therapies and treatments of veterinaries are reviewed. While analyzing general liability reasons of veterinaries, it is first explicated under which circumstances would a veterinary be liable according to a contract and from which type or types of contracts would this liability incur.After that, the liability of veterinary that arise from tort, acting without authority and veterinary s strict liability that can arise from the animal owners liability or risk liability.

Özet

Çalışmada, veteriner hekimin hukuki sorumluluğu bağlamında hayvan kavramı ve hayvanın hukuki niteliği bu konuda Türkiyedeki, diğer hukuk sistemlerindeki ve uluslararası düzenlemelerdeki esaslara yer verilerek ele alınmış; ardından da veteriner hekimlerin uyguladıkları tedavi sonucunda genel olarak karşılaşabilecekleri sorumluluk sebepleri değerlendirilmiştir. Veteriner hekimin genel olarak sorumluluk sebeplerinin incelenmesi sırasında öncelikle veteriner hekimin hangi hallerde sorumluluğunun sözleşmeden doğabileceği ve söz konusu sorumluluğun hangi sözleşme türünden veya türlerinden kaynaklanabileceği irdelenmiştir. Bunun ardından veteriner hekimin sözleşme dışı sorumluluğunun incelenmesi esnasında, veteriner hekimin haksız fiilden ve vekaletsiz iş görmeden doğan sorumluluğu; bunlara ilaveten hayvan bulunduranın sorumluluğu veya tehlike sorumluluğu çerçevesinde kusursuz sorumlu olduğu haller tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORAL, T. (2022). The non-contractual liability of veterinary. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16, 319–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/626426

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Atıcı Sevindik, Ebru, Hekimlerin Mesleki Hatalarından Kaynaklanan Hukuksal ve Cezai Sorumlulukları, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana 2006
  2. Başpınar, Veysel, “Organ Naklinde Hekimin Aydınlatma Yükümü (Die Aufkalaerungspflichtdes Arztesfürdie Patientenbei der Organtransplantation)”, http://auhf.ankara.edu.tr/kitaplar/diger-eserler/veysel-baspinar
  3. Bleckwenn, Eike, Die Haftungdes Tierarzes im Zivilrecht, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2014
  4. Demir, Mehmet, “Hekimin sözleşmeden Doğan Sorumluluğu”, AÜHFD, 2008, C. 57, S. 3, s. 225-252
  5. Deutsch, Erwin/Spıckhoff, Andreas, Medizinrecht, 5. Auflage, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003
  6. Eren, Fikret, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 15. Baskı, Ankara, 2013
  7. Fellmer, Eberhard, “Der Tierarztvor Gericht”, Tierartzliche Praxis, 1986, s. 1-7
  8. Heıdelk, Stefanie, Gesundheitsverletzungund Gesundheitsschaden, Berlin, 2005
  9. Honsell, Heinrich/Vogt, N. Peter/Geıser, Thomas/Trauffer, Bernhard, Kommentarzum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, II, Basel 1998
  10. Katzenmeıer, Christian, Arzthafrung, Tübingen, 2002
  11. Laufs, Adolf/ Katzenmeıer, Christian/Lıpp, Volker, Arztrecht, 6. Aufl., München, 2009
  12. Laufs, Adolf/Kern, Bernd-Rüdiger, Handbuchdes Artzrechts – Zivilrecht, öffentliches Recht, Vertragsarztrecht, Krankenhausrecht, Strafrecht, 4. Aufl. München, 2010
  13. Larenz, Karl/Canarıs, Claus-Wilhelm, Lehrbuchdes Schuldrechts, Bd. II, BesondererTeil, Halbband 2, 13. Aufl. München, 1993
  14. Münchener Kommentar zum BGB, Bd. 4, Schuldrecht BT II, §§ 611-704 (Hrsg. SAECKER, Franz Jürgen/RIXECKER, Roland), 6. Aufl.,München, 2012
  15. Münchener Kommentar zum BGB, Schuldrecht, BT III, §§ 705-853
  16. PartGG, ProdHaftG, Bd. 5 (Hrsg. REBMANN, Kurt/RIXECKER, Roland/SAECKER, Franz Jürgen), 6. Aufl. München 2012
  17. Oftınger, Karl, Schweizerisches Haftpflichtrecht, BesondererTeil, Band II/1, 2. Auflage, Zürich, 1960
  18. Oftınger, Karl/Stark, Emil Wilhelm, Schweizerisches Haftpflichtrecht, BesondererTeil, Bd.II/1, 4. Aufl., Zürich 1987
  19. Oğuzman, Kemal/Seliçi, Özer/Oktay-Özdemir, Saibe, Eşya Hukuku, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2011
  20. Oral, Tuğçe, “The Definition of Legal Relationship Between a Patientand Physician”, Ankara Bar Review, Vol., 4 Issue 1, January 2011, s. 21-32, http:// heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ankar4&div=4&collection =journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults&terms=tugce|oral&type= matchall#21 Ozanoğlu, Hasan Seçkin,“Hekimlerin Hastalarını Aydınlatma Yükümlülüğü”, Ankara Üniversi