Journals / Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20

The right to education in the case-law of the European court of human rights

Avrupa insan hakları mahkemesi kararlarında eğitim hakkı

Pages
279–328
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the problems revealed from the ECtHR approach relating to the right to education have been evaluated and some recommendations have been made to solve the problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aims of this study are to identify and evaluate how the right to education has been interpreted by the ECtHR, in this context, which values and principles have been used in that interpretation, whether such values and principles are appropriate or not to produce fair solutions to the problems encountered in the field of education and finally to make recommendations relating to the said problematic areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this sense, firstly the ECtHR judgments relating to the right to education have been reviewed and the general principles revealed from these judgments have been included in main titles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the problems revealed from the ECtHR approach relating to the right to education have been evaluated and some recommendations have been made to solve the problems.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aims of this study are to identify and evaluate how the right to education has been interpreted by the ECtHR, in this context, which values and principles have been used in that interpretation, whether such values and principles are appropriate or not to produce fair solutions to the problems encountered in the field of education and finally to make recommendations relating to the said problematic areas. In this sense, firstly the ECtHR judgments relating to the right to education have been reviewed and the general principles revealed from these judgments have been included in main titles. In the subheadings, how the said principles have been reflect- ed to the specific issues. Meanwhile, the opposite arguments in the relevant liter- ature relating to the ECtHR approach have also been included and evaluated when necessary. Finally, the problems revealed from the ECtHR approach relating to the right to education have been evaluated and some recommendations have been made to solve the problems.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, eğitim hakkının Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (AİHM veya Mahkeme) tarafından ne şekilde yorumlandığının, bu çerçevede hangi değer ve ilkelerin temel alındığının, bunların eğitim alanında karşılaşılan sorunlara adil çözümler getirme- ye elverişli olup olmadığının tespiti, değerlendirilmesi ve belirlenen sorunlu alanlar yö- nünden çözüm önerileri getirilmesidir. Bu kapsamda öncelikle AİHM (ve faaliyette olduğu dönem için Avrupa İnsan Hakları Komisyonu [Komisyon]) tarafından verilen kararlar taranmış, bu kararlardan çıkarılan genel ilkelere eğitim hakkının farklı yönlerine ilişkin ana başlıklar altında yer verilmiş, alt başlıklarda ise anılan ilkelerin spesifik konulara nasıl yansıdığı tespit edilmiş, bu arada gerek görüldükçe Mahkemenin yaklaşımına ilişkin doktrinde dile getirilen eleş- tirilere yer verilmiş, değerlendirmeler yapılmış, sonuç bölümünde ise AİHM’in eğitim hakkına ilişkin yaklaşımında ortaya çıkan sorunların genel değerlendirmesi yapılarak çözüm önerisinde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, A. (2022). The right to education in the case-law of the European court of human rights. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20, 279–328. https://ajindex.com/articles/626387

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbulut, Olgun/Usal, Zeynep Oya: Parental Religious Rights v. Compulsory Religious Education in Turkey, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, Vol. 15, Issue 4 (2008). Avrupa Konseyi Parlamenterler Meclisi. The situation of Roma in Europe and relevant activities of the Council of Europe, Resolution 1740 (2010) http://as- sembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/adoptedtext/ta10/eres1740.htm (Erş: 16.5.2014).
  2. Bleiberg, Benjamin: Unveiling the Real Issue: Evaluating the European Court of Human Rights’ Decision to Enforce the Turkish Headscarf Ban in Leyla Sahin v. Turkey, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 91, Issue 1 (November 2005).
  3. Duminica, Ramona; Tabacu, Andreea: Brief Reflections on the Exercise of the Right to Education of the Romany Minority, AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences (2010).
  4. Garcimartin, Carmen: “Education in the Secular State: Whose Right Is It”, In- ternational Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family, Vol. 2 (2011).
  5. Hamlyn, Victoria: Indivisibility of Human Rights: Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, The Bracton Law Jour- nal, Vol. 40, Issue 1 (2008).
  6. Koch, Ida Elisabeth: Human Rights As Indivisible Rights: The Protection of So- cio-economic Demands under the European Convention on Human Rights, Martinus Nijhoff Publ., Netherlands (2009).
  7. Langlaude, Sylvie: Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the ECHR, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 55, Issue 4 (October 2006).
  8. Nowak, Manfred: Right to Education - Its Meaning, Significance and Limitati- ons, The Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 9, Issue 4 (1991).
  9. Palmer, Ellie: Protecting Socio-Economic Rights through the European Conven- tion on Human Rights: Trends and Developments in the European Court of Human Rights, Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 2, Issue 4 (2009).
  10. Pin, Andrea: (European) Stars or (American) Stripes: Are the European Court of Human Rights’ Neutrality and the Supreme Court’s Wall of Separation One and the Same, St. John’s Law Review, Vol. 85, Issue 2 (Spring 2011).
  11. Romero, Alicia Cebada: European Court of Human Rights and Religion: Betwe- en Christian Neutrality and the Fear of Islam, New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, Vol. 11, Special Conference Issue (November 2013).
  12. Rush, Andrea J.: Lautsi v. Italy: Deference to State Sovereignty from on High as the Cross Remains Nailed to Italian School Walls, Tulane Journal of Internatio- nal and Comparative Law, Vol. 20, Is