Journals / Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20

The reform provided by additional protocols no 15 and 16 in the implementation of the european convention on human rights

Avrupa insan hakları sözleşmesi uygulamasında 15 ve 16 nolu ek protokollerle öngörülen reform

Pages
59–86
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, reforms set up in the Protocol No. 15 and 16 has been the particular concern.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The legal system of the European Convention on Human Rights has been constant- ly developing and thus facing many challenges, mainly because of individual needs and social expectations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In overcoming these challenges, the reform has been an ab- solute necessity based on the concent and the will of party states.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, reforms set up in the Protocol No. 15 and 16 has been the particular concern.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The legal system of the European Convention on Human Rights has been constant- ly developing and thus facing many challenges, mainly because of individual needs and social expectations. In overcoming these challenges, the reform has been an ab- solute necessity based on the concent and the will of party states. In general, necessary legal provisions have been discussed in the form of inter- national conferences by the member states of the Council of Europe, the European Court of Human Rights, and certain institutions of the Council of Europe, and ulti- mately opened for signatures. Turkey has also participated in these efforts. The intro- duction of the reforms essentially aims to serve practical and effective realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms at natioanl levels. The main point of this article is to examine reforms made so far in the legal machi- nary of the system in general. However, reforms set up in the Protocol No. 15 and 16 has been the particular concern.

Özet

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi hukuk sistemi, kurulduğu tarihten itibaren hem nitelik ve mekanizma olarakhem detaraf devlet, dolayısıyla yararlanan kişi sayısı ba- kımından sürekli şekilde gelişmiş bulunmaktadır. Ne var ki, sistemin yargısal mekaniz- ması zamanla gelişen ihtiyaçlar karşısında zorluklarla karşılaşmaktadır. Bu zorlukların aşılmasında, taraf devletlerin rıza ve iradeleri temelinde yeni düzenlemeler yapılması yoluna gidilmektedir. Gerekli görülen düzenlemeler, genellikle Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi, Avrupa Konseyi’nin ilgili kurumları ve taraf devletlerince milletlerarası konferans platformun- da tartışılmakta ve imzaya açılmaktadır. Türkiye’nin de katıldığı bu çabalar, temelde, insan hak ve özgürlüklerinin millî düzeylerde pratikte etkin şekilde gerçekleştirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu makalede, yargısal sistemin etkinliği adına yapılan düzenlemelere yer verilmek- tedir. Esas itibarıyla, yürürlüğe girmesi beklenen Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’ne Ek 15 ve 16 Nolu Protokoller’le öngörülen yenilikler inceleme konusu edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

POYRAZ, Y., GÖZLÜGÖL, S. V. (2022). The reform provided by additional protocols no 15 and 16 in the implementation of the european convention on human rights. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20, 59–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/626372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. BAKIRCIOĞLU, Önder, “The Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctri- ne in Freedom of Expression and Public Morality Cases”, German Law Journal, Volume 8, Issue 7, 2007, pp. 711–734.
  2. BİLİR, Faruk, “Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nin Yapısı ve 14 Nolu Protokol”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 55, Sayı 1, 2006.
  3. Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, High Level Conference on the Fu- ture of the European Court of Human Rights, Interlaken Declaration, Swit- zerland, 19 February 2010, and the related documents [https://wcd.coe.int/ ViewDoc.jsp?id=1591969, 5 Aralık 2014].
  4. Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, Brighton Declaration, Uni- ted Kingdom, 20 April 2012 [https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=Brighton- Declaration&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original&Site=COE&BackColorIn- ternet=DBDCF2&BackColorIntranet=FDC864&BackColorLogged=FDC864, 5 Aralık 2014].
  5. Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Resolution Res(2004)3 on Judg- ments Revealing an Underlying Systemic Problem, 12 May 2004 [https://wcd. coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=743257&Lang=fr, 7 Kasım 2014].
  6. Council of Europe, Explanatory Report, Protocol No. 15 amending the Con- vention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (CETS No. 213) [http://www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Reports/Html/213.ht- m#FN4, 7 Aralık 2014].
  7. Council of Europe, Explanatory Report, Protocol No. 16 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (CETS No. 214) [http://www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Reports/Html/214.htm, 8 Aralık 2014].
  8. Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assambly, Opinion 285 (2013) Final version, 28 June 2013, Draft Protocol No. 16 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/ XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20015&lang=en, 7 Aralık 2014].
  9. Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, Opinion 283 (2013) Final version, 26 April 2013, Draft Protocol No. 15 amending the Convention for the Prote- ction of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [http://assembly.coe.int/ nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=19723&lang=en, 5 Aralık 2014].
  10. Council of Europe, Protocol No. 10 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, CETS No. 146 [http://conventions. coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ListeTraites.asp?-MA=3&CM=7&CL=ENG, 5 Şubat 2014].
  11. Council of Europe, Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for