Journals / Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24

The Offence of Tapping and Recording of Conversations Between the Individuals (Turkish Criminal Code, Article 133)

K İŞİLER ARASINDAKİ KONUŞMALARIN DİNLENMESİ VE KAYDA ALINMASI SUÇU (TCK M. 133)

Pages
149–198
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Under thesecircumstances, the offence of tapping and recording of conversations between theindividuals was regulated in article 133 of Turkish Criminal Code (Law No. 5237).There are three types of offences in this article which will be examined in this Article.These are listening to non general conversations between the individuals or recordingthese conversations by use of a recorder, recording a conversation in a meeting not open to public by use of recorder, unlawfully disclosuring the information obtained byrecording non general conversations between the individuals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Humans, as social creatures, are in need of face to face communication with eachother.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, because the moderntapping technologies are developing day after day, the risk of interference in privatelife through the violation of confidentiality of conversations increases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Under thesecircumstances, the offence of tapping and recording of conversations between theindividuals was regulated in article 133 of Turkish Criminal Code (Law No. 5237).There are three types of offences in this article which will be examined in this Article.These are listening to non general conversations between the individuals or recordingthese conversations by use of a recorder, recording a conversation in a meeting not open to public by use of recorder, unlawfully disclosuring the information obtained byrecording non general conversations between the individuals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Humans, as social creatures, are in need of face to face communication with eachother. Everyone is in possession of his/her statements so has the right to determinetheir scope of influence; in other words, it is up to the person to specify otherpeople who will hear his/her statements, to decide whether the conversations canbe recorded and who can listen to these recordings. However, because the moderntapping technologies are developing day after day, the risk of interference in privatelife through the violation of confidentiality of conversations increases. Under thesecircumstances, the offence of tapping and recording of conversations between theindividuals was regulated in article 133 of Turkish Criminal Code (Law No. 5237).There are three types of offences in this article which will be examined in this Article.These are listening to non general conversations between the individuals or recordingthese conversations by use of a recorder, recording a conversation in a meeting not open to public by use of recorder, unlawfully disclosuring the information obtained byrecording non general conversations between the individuals.

Özet

Toplumsal bir varlık olan insan, diğer insanlarla yüz yüze iletişim kurmak vekonuşmak ihtiyacı içindedir. Kişi, sözleri üzerinde tasarruf imkanına sahip olup;sözlerinin etki alanını, yani sözlerinin kimler tarafından duyulacağını, kayda alınıpalınmayacağını, bu kayıtların içeriğine kimlerin vakıf olacağını belirleme hakkınasahiptir. Ancak, günümüzde modern dinleme teknolojilerinin gelişmesi ve her geçengün bir yenisinin eklenmesi, konuşmaların gizliliğinin ihlali yolu ile kişilerin özelyaşamına müdahale riskini artırmaktadır. İşte bu durum karşısında, 5237 sayılı TürkCeza Kanununun 133. maddesinde kişiler arasındaki konuşmaların dinlenmesi vekayda alınması suçu düzenlenmiştir. Maddede üç ayrı suç tipi tanımlanmıştır: Kişilerarasındaki aleni olmayan konuşmaları bir aletle dinleme veya ses alma cihazı ilekaydetme; katıldığı aleni olmayan bir söyleşiyi ses alma cihazı ile kaydetme; kişilerarasındaki aleni olmayan konuşmaların kaydedilmesi suretiyle elde edilen verilerihukuka aykırı olarak ifşa etme. Makalede bu suç tipleri incelenecektir

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTÜRK, N. (2022). The Offence of Tapping and Recording of Conversations Between the Individuals (Turkish Criminal Code, Article 133). Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24, 149–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/626332

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Akyürek, Güçlü, Özel Hayatın Gizliliğini İhlal Suçu, 2. Baskı,
  2. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2014.
  3. Artuk, Mehmet Emin / Gökcen, Ahmet / Yenidünya, A. Caner, Ceza Hukuku, Genel Hükümler, 7. Baskı,
  4. Adalet yayınevi, Ankara, 2013.
  5. Baumann, Jürgen / Weber, Ulrich / Mitsch, Wolfgang, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 11. Auflage, Verlag Ernst und Werner Gieseking, Bielefeld, 2003.
  6. Bringewat, Peter, Grundbegriffe des Strafrechts, 2. Auflage, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, 2008.
  7. Centel, Nur / Zafer, Hamide / Çakmut, Özlem, Türk Ceza Hukukuna Giriş, 7. Bası, Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2011.
  8. Demirbaş, Timur, Ceza Hukuku, Genel Hükümler, 10. Baskı,
  9. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2014.
  10. Ebert, Udo, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 3. Auflage, C. F. Müller Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.
  11. Ekici-Şahin, Meral, Ceza Hukukunda Rıza, XII Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2012.
  12. Freund, Georg, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 2. Auflage, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2009.
  13. Frister, Helmut, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 6. Auflage, C. H. Beck Verlag, München, 2013.
  14. Göktürk, Neslihan, “Hukuka Uygunluk Nedenleri Objektif Nitelikte Midir?”, CHD 2015/27, s. 7-28.
  15. Göktürk, Neslihan, “Hukuka Uygunluk Nedenlerinin Maddi Koşullarında Yanılgının Hukuki Niteliği”, CHD 2014/26, s. 7-30.
  16. Göktürk, Neslihan, Fikri İçtima, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2013.
  17. Graf, Jürgen Peter, in: MK-StGB, Band 4, 2. Auflage, C. H. Beck Verlag, München, 2011.
  18. Hakeri, Hakan, Ceza Hukuku, Genel Hükümler, 18. Baskı,
  19. Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2014.
  20. Heinrich, Bernd, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 3. Auflage, verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 2012.
  21. Heuchemer, Michael, in: BeckOK-StGB, 27. Auflage, C. H. Beck Verlag, München, 2015.
  22. Hilgendorf, Eric / Valerius, Brian, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 7. Auflage, C. H. Beck Verlag, München, 2013.
  23. Jakobs, Günther, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 2. Auflage, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1991.
  24. Jescheck, Hans Heinrich / Weigend, Thomas, Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, Allgemeiner Teil, 5. Auflage, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1996.
  25. Kangal, Zeynel T., Ceza Hukukunda Zorunluluk Durumu, 1. Baskı,
  26. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2010.
  27. Kargl, Walter, in: NK-StGB, Band 2, 4. Auflage, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, 2013.
  28. Katoğlu, Tuğrul, Ceza Hukukunda Hukuka Aykırılık, 1. Baskı,
  29. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2003.
  30. Kaufmann, Arthur, Das Schuldprinzip, 2. Auflage, Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, Heidelberg, 1976. Kindhäuser, Urs, Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 6. Auflage, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, 2013.
  31. Koca, Mahmut / Üzülmez, İlhan, Türk