Journals / Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 25

Examination of Obscenity with Respect to Freedom of Speech in Scientific, Artistic and Litaral Works

Pages
153–168
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition,internet and television broadcasting must be filtered instead of blocked on purposeof save from obscene publications and works the children

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Interventions of the state are against to the use of freedom of speech so as toprotect public morality and health show itself especially for the obscene publicationsand works.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These interferences reason consept construing liberal like as publicmoral and health showing justification of restraint have been approved in nationaland international judicial decisions a vast scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition,internet and television broadcasting must be filtered instead of blocked on purposeof save from obscene publications and works the children
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Interventions of the state are against to the use of freedom of speech so as toprotect public morality and health show itself especially for the obscene publicationsand works. These interferences reason consept construing liberal like as publicmoral and health showing justification of restraint have been approved in nationaland international judicial decisions a vast scale. Expert examinations not based upon concrete and scientific criterion have also formed one of important reason ofpractices against freedom of speech. In meaning of solving of existing problems, subject to obscene publications orworks must be evaluated whether they cary value scientific, artistic or literal withmethods of scientific and more libertarion perspective. So, constuction of councilofficial expert of preventing obscene publication must be changed. In addition,internet and television broadcasting must be filtered instead of blocked on purposeof save from obscene publications and works the children

🔖

Cite This Article

AYGÜN, A., TOPAÇ, T. H., GÜRÜHAN, C. (2022). Examination of Obscenity with Respect to Freedom of Speech in Scientific, Artistic and Litaral Works. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 25, 153–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/626295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Macovei, Monica, İfade Özgürlüğü – Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’nin 10. Maddesinin Uygulanmasına İlişkin Kılavuz, İnsan Hakları El Kitapları, No.2 Harris, Davis/O’Boyle, Michael/Bates, Ed/Buckley, Carla, (Çevirenler: Meh- veş Bingöllü Kılcı, Ulaş Karan) Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Hukuku, Türkçe 1. baskı, Avrupa Konseyi 2013
  2. Doğru, Osman/Nalbant, Atilla, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi – Açıklama ve Önemli Kararlar, 2. Cilt, T.C. Yargıtay Başkanlığı, 1. Baskı, Ankara 2013
  3. Schauer, Frederick, (Çev: M. Bahattin Seçilmişoğlu), İfade Özgürlüğü Felse- fi Bir İnceleme, Cambridge Üniversitesi Matbaası, 1. Baskı, United States Of America 1982
  4. Doğan, Mehmet, Bilim ve Teknoloji Tarihi, Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara 2010
  5. Yıldırım, Cemal, Bilim Felsefesi, 7. Basım, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul 2000
  6. Kutlu, Aytuğ, Dünden Bugüne Bilim ve Teknoloji, Biltav Yayınları, Ankara 1996
  7. Okay, Orhan, Sanat ve Edebiyat Yazıları, 3. baskı, Dergah Yayınları, İstanbul 2011
  8. Önal, Mehmet, Edebiyat Sanatı, Kurgan Edebiyat Yayınları, Ankara 2012
  9. Şişman, Ahmet, Sanata ve Sanat Kavramlarına Giriş, Yaz Yayınları, İstanbul 2006
  10. Yeşil, Kamil, Türk Edebiyatı Öğretmen El Kitabı, Elips Kitap,,Ankara 2007
  11. Baytan, Dilek Karakuzu, Fikir Mülkiyeti Hukuku-Kavramlar, Beta, İstanbul 2005
  12. Levend, Agah Sırrı, Türk Edebiyatı Tarihi, Cilt I, 4. Baskı,
  13. Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, Ankara 1998
  14. Kavcar, Cahit, II. Meşrutiyet Devrinde Edebiyat ve Eğitim, İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi yayınları, no:3, Malatya 1988
  15. Kılıçel, Yusuf Şerif, Muhtasar Avrupa Edebiyatı, Maarif Vekaleti, 1935
  16. Tural, Sadık, Zamanın Elinden Tutmak, Yüce Erek Yayınevi, Ankara 2006
  17. Buyse, Antoine, Literary Heritage Judgment - A Novel by Apollinaire, 16.02.2010, http://echrblog. blogspot. com.tr/2010/02/literary-heritage-ju- dgment-novel-by.html (Erişim Tarihi: 19.11.2015)
  18. Burbergs, Maris, What is the European Literary Heritage?, 13.04.2010, http:// strasbourgobservers.com/2010/04/13/what-is-the-european-literary-herita- ge-2/#more-54 (Erişim Tarihi: 19.11.2015)
  19. Memiş, Tekin, “Erişimin Engellenmesi, Hukuki Sorunlar ve Çözüm Yolları”, Er- zincan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. XIII, S. 3-4 Y. 2009
  20. Kılınç, Doğan, “Türk Hukukunda ve Mukayeseli Hukukta İnternet Sitelerine Erişimin Engellenmesi ve İfade Özgürlüğü”, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. XIV., S. 2, Y. 2010