SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 38

Amicus Curiae and Amicus Brief Procedures On the Disputes Before International Court of Justice

ULUSLARARASI ADALET DİVANI’NDA GÖRÜLEN DAVALARA DOSTANE KATILIM (AMIcuS curIAE) VE DOSTANE MÜTALAA (AMIcuS BrIEf) USULÜ

Oğuz Kaan PEHLİVAN
Pages
315–342
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Regarding the article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:International Court of Justice has two kinds of function; to settle international legal disputes brought by States (Contentious cases) and to give a legal opinion (advisory proceeding) on legal questions of States, authorized UN Bodies and specialized organs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also States have the right to intervene the disputes (both contentious cases or advisory proceedings) at any time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Regarding the article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

International Court of Justice has two kinds of function; to settle international legal disputes brought by States (Contentious cases) and to give a legal opinion (advisory proceeding) on legal questions of States, authorized UN Bodies and specialized organs. Also States have the right to intervene the disputes (both contentious cases or advisory proceedings) at any time. Within this article, amicus curiae and amicus brief procedures, in other words, participation of third parties whom nonparties to the dispute before International Court of Justice will be examined. Third-party participation to the proceedings before the Court will. Regarding the article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

Özet

Uluslararası Adalet Divanı çekişmeli yargılama ve danışma kararları olmak üzere ikili bir çözüm mekanizmasına sahiptir. Her iki durumda da devletlerin taraf ehliyeti vardır. BM organları ile 16 uzmanlık kuruluşu danışma görüşü almak için Divan’a başvurabilir. Bunun yanı sıra, devletler kendilerini ilgilendiren davalara müdahale yoluyla katılarak taraf olabilirler. Bu çalışmada, Uluslararası Adalet Divanı yargı süreçlerinde dostane katılımmütalaa kurumu ele alınacak, üçüncü kişilerin davaya katılımı ile bilgi ve belge sunmaları tartışılacaktır. Divan Statüsü 38. madde uyarınca ilgili uluslararası antlaşmalar ve hükümleri, örf ve adet hukuku ile hukukun genel prensipleri ile Divan kararları, içtihatlar ve doktrin tartışmaları ışığında dostane müdahale kurumunun hukuki temelleri araştırılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEHLİVAN, O. K. (2022). Amicus Curiae and Amicus Brief Procedures On the Disputes Before International Court of Justice. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 38, 315–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/626233

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Allison Lucas. “Friends of the Court? The Ethics of Amicus Curiae Brief Writing in First Amendment Litigation.” Fordham Law Journal, Vol. 26 (1999). Dinah Shelton, ‘The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings’, American Journal of International Law 88 (1994).
  2. Christian Tomuschat, Andreas Zimmermann, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, (2012).
  3. Francis Bacon, The works of Francis Bacon, Baron of Verulam, Viscount St. Alban, and Lord High Chancellor of England, in five volumes, Vol. 1, Reink Books, (2017). Gleider I. Hernandez, ‘Non-State Actors from the Perspective of the International Court of Justice’, içinde Participants in the International Legal System-Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (d’Aspremont, J., ed., 2011).
  4. Hüseyin Pazarcı, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, 2. Kitap, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara, (2014).
  5. Hüseyin Pazarcı, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, 4. Kitap, Turhan Kitabevi,
  6. Ankara (2016).
  7. Jacob Giles, The Law-Dictionary: Explaining The Rise, Progress, And Present State Of The English Law, In Theory And Practice; Defining And Interpreting The Terms Or Words Of Art; And Comprising Copious Information, Historical, Political, And Commercial, On The Subjects Of Our Law, Trade, And Government, (1797). John S. Garrison, Friendship and Queer Theory in the Renaissance: Gender and Sexuality in Early Modern England, Routledge, (2014) Luigi Crema, ‘Testing Amici Curiae in International Law: Rules and Practice’, Italian Yearbook of International Law, 22, (2012).
  8. Michael J. Harris. “Amicus Curiae: Friend or Foe? Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy, Vol. 5 (2000).
  9. Michael K. Lowman. “The Litigating Amicus Curiae: When Does the Party Begin after the Friends Leave?” American University Law Review Vol. 41, No. 4, (1992).
  10. Ömer İlhan Akipek, Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara, (1974). Paolo Palchetti, “Opening the International Court of Justice to Third States: Intervention and Beyond”, Max Plank Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 6, 2002. Pierre-Marie Dupuy “Article 34” içinde Christian Tomuschat, Andreas Zimmermann, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, (2012). Roberts Y. Jennings, “The International Court of Justice After Fifty Years”, The American Journal of Internati