Journals / Türkiye Acil Tıp Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Abdominal trauma: An analysis of 827 patients.

Karın travmaları: 827 olgunun değerlendirilmesi

Pages
186–191
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Morbidity and mortality rates can be reduced by a prompt diagnosis and treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The aim of this study is to examine the patients who were brought to Emergency Medicine Department of Erciyes University School of Medicine due to the abdominal trauma and treated with non-operatively or operatively by the surgical department in the light of relevant literature data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Between the years 2000-2005 years, patients were retrospectively evaluated according to the following criteria: age, gender, cause of trauma, accompanying other system traumas, treatment methods, complications and mortality rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Morbidity and mortality rates can be reduced by a prompt diagnosis and treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to examine the patients who were brought to Emergency Medicine Department of Erciyes University School of Medicine due to the abdominal trauma and treated with non-operatively or operatively by the surgical department in the light of relevant literature data. Material and Method: Between the years 2000-2005 years, patients were retrospectively evaluated according to the following criteria: age, gender, cause of trauma, accompanying other system traumas, treatment methods, complications and mortality rates. Results: During the study period, of 827 patients who admitted to the emergency department due to the abdominal trauma, 72.3% were male and 27.7% female with ages ranging from 16 to 89 years. 333 patients had blunt abdominal trauma and 494 patients penetrating abdominal trauma. 34.3% of them treated surgically where as 65.7% had nonoperatively. There was no significant difference between mortality rate and injury type (p>0.05), also sex (p>0.05), whereas the mortality rate was higher in patients undergone operation (p0.05). Conclusion: Great majority of abdominal trauma patients, especially solid organ injuries, can be treated conservatively. Morbidity and mortality rates can be reduced by a prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Acil Servisi'ne son beş yıl içinde başvuran ve Genel Cerrahi Kliniği'nde cerrahi ya da konservatif tedavi uygulanan karın travmalı olguların literatür değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2000-2005 yılları arasında Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Acil Servisi'ne başvuran ve karın travması saptanan hastalar geriye dönük olarak; yaş, cinsiyet, travma nedenleri, eşlik eden diğer sistem yaralanmaları, uygulanan tanı yöntemleri, tedavi yaklaşımları, morbidite ve mortalite sonuçları açısından hasta kayıtları araştırılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışma döneminde acil servise getirilen 16-89 yaş arası travmalı hastalardan 827'sinde karın travması saptandı. Bunların %72.3'i erkek, %27.7'i kadındı. Olguların 333'ü künt travma sonrası acil servise getirilirken, 494 olguda getirilme nedeni penetran yaralanmaydı. Hastaların %34.3'üne cerrahi tedavi uygulanırken, %65.7'sine konservatif tedavi uygulandı. Künt ve penetran karın travmalı olgular mortalite yönünden karşılaştırıldığında yaralanma tipi ve cinsiyet açısından gruplar arasında istatistik olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmazken (p>0.05); cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastalarda mortalitenin anlamlı derecede arttığı saptandı (p0.05). Sonuç: Acil cerrahi müdahale gerektiren patolojiler dışında karın travmalarının büyük çoğunluğu, özellikle solid organ yaralanmaları, konservatif yöntemlerle tedavi edilebilmektedir. İyi bir travma resusitasyonu, hızlı tanı ve doğru tedavi ile morbidite ve mortaliteyi azaltmak mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKCAN, A., AKYILDIZ, H., İKİZCELİ, F., ARTIŞ, T., SÖZÜER, E. M., YILMAZ, N., KÜÇÜK, C. (2022). Abdominal trauma: An analysis of 827 patients.. Türkiye Acil Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 186–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/626202

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Taviloğlu K. Travmaya genel yaklaşım. İÜ, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Klinik Ders Kitapları Serisi- Genel Cerrahi. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi;2002; 97-313. 2.American Collage of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma: Advanced Tra¬ uma Life Support Manual. Chicago, III: American Collage of Surgeons; 1997. 3.Anderson ID, Woodford M, de Dombal T, et al. A retrospective study of 1000 deaths from injury in England and Wales. BrMedJ 1988; 296: 1305-1308. 4.Fabian TC, Croce MA. Abdominal trauma, including indications for ce- liotomy. In: Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, eds. Trauma. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2000: 583-602. 5.West JG, Trunkey DD, Lim RC. Systems of trauma care. Study of two counties. Arch Surg 1979; 114: 455-460. 6.Demetriades D, Rabinowitz B. Indications for operation in abdominal stab wounds. Ann Surg 1987; 205: 129-132. 7.Mckenney KL, Nunez DB, Mckenney MG, et al. Sonograph as the pri¬ mary screening technique for blunt abdominal: Experience with 899 pa¬ tients. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 979-985. 8.Tso P, Rodriguez A, Cooper C. Sonograph in blunt abdominal trauma: A preliminary progress report. / Trauma 1992; 33: 39-43. 9.Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Schmidth JA, et al. A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for in¬ jured patient assessment. / Trauma 1995; 39: 492-500. 10.Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Jaffin JH, et al. Prospective evaluation of surgeon's use of ultrasound in trauma patients. / Trauma 1993; 34: 516- 526. 11.Ferrada R, Birolini D. New concepts in the management of patients with penetrating abdominal wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79: 1331-1356. 12.Anderson ID. Major trauma: a district general hospital experience. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1274. 13.Root HD, Hauser CW, McKinley CR, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Surgery 1965; 57: 633-637. 14.Fisher RP, Beverlin BC, Engrav LH, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage;14 years and 2586 patients later. Am J Surg 1978; 136: 701-704. 15.Simpson RL, Turner VF. Diagnostic percutaneous peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma: rationale, technique and results. Aust N Z J Surg 1986; 56: 103-107. 16.Nagy KK, Roberts RR, Joseph KT, et al. Experience with over 2500 diagnostic peritoneal lavages. Injury 2000; 31: 479-482. 17.Sözüer EM, Akyiirek N, Kafalı ME, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma victims. Eur J Em Med 1998; 5: 231-234 18.Ortega AE, Tang E, Froes ET, et al. Laparoscopic evaluation of penet¬ rating thoracoabdominal traumati