Journals / Türkiye Acil Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Acil Serviste Ultrasonografi Eşliğinde Takılan Santral Venöz Kataterlerin Komplikasyon Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

An Evaluation of Complications in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion in the Emergency Department

Pages
53–58
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The risk of complication is little if any in ultrasonographyguided access carried out under appropriate conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ObjectivesIn emergency departments, emergency physicians frequently have to perform central venous access.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried out to evaluate the emergence of complications in the process of and in the 15 days following the insertion of central venous catheter under ultrasound guidance in the emergency department.MethodsFor this study, patients who presented to the emergency department over a period of eight months with an urgent need for central catheter were examined prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The risk of complication is little if any in ultrasonographyguided access carried out under appropriate conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ObjectivesIn emergency departments, emergency physicians frequently have to perform central venous access. In cases where peripheral venous access is not possible, central venous access is required for dialysis, fulfillment of urgent fluid need, or central venous pressure measurement. This study was carried out to evaluate the emergence of complications in the process of and in the 15 days following the insertion of central venous catheter under ultrasound guidance in the emergency department.MethodsFor this study, patients who presented to the emergency department over a period of eight months with an urgent need for central catheter were examined prospectively. Age, gender, and accompanying diseases of patients as well as the type, time, duration, and indication of the venous access were recorded. Furthermore, the amount of experience of the physician was taken into consideration.ResultsIn the emergency department, physicians performed ultrasoundguided central venous catheter insertion for 74 patients (40 men and 34 women). For access, internal jugular vein was used in 65 (87.8%) patients, and femoral vein was used in 9 (12.2%) patients. The reason for access was urgent dialysis need in 55 (74.3%), CVP measurement in 3 (4.1%), fluid support due to severe hypovolemia in 6 (8.1%), and difficulty of peripheral venous access in 10 (13.5%) patients. None of the patients developed complications in the process of or after the insertion. Patients did not have infections related to the catheter in 15 days following the insertion.ConclusionsCentral venous access is frequently required in emergency departments. The risk of complication is little if any in ultrasonographyguided access carried out under appropriate conditions.

Özet

Amaç Acil servislerde acil tıp hekimlerince santral damar yolu işlemi sık uygulanır. Periferik damar yolu açılamadığı hallerde, diyaliz, acil sıvı ihtiyacı veya santral venöz basınç ölçümü gereken durumlarda hastalar için santral damar yolu gerekmektedir. Acil serviste, ultrasonografi (USG) kılavuzluğunda uygulanan acil santral venöz katater girişimi sürecinde ve uygulamayı takip eden 15 gün içerisinde komplikasyon varlığını değerlendirmek amacı ile bu çalışma yapıldı. Gereç ve YöntemSekiz aylık sürede acil servise başvuran ve acil santral katater gereksinimi olan hastalar ileriye dönük olarak incelendi. Hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, eşlik eden hastalıkları ile tercih edilen girişimin yolu, saati, süresi ve endikasyonu kaydedildi. Ayrıca girişimi yapan hekimin çalışma yılı da değerlendirmeye dahil edildi.BulgularUltrasonografi eşliğinde santral venöz katater takılan 74 (40 erkek, 34 kadın) hastanın 65'inde (%87.8) internal juguler ven, dokuzunda (%12.2) femoral ven girişim için kullanıldı. Uygulama olguların 55'inde (%74.3) acil diyaliz ihtiyacı, üçünde (%4.1) CVP ölçümü, altısında (%8.1) ciddi hipovolemi için sıvı desteği, 10'unda (%13.5) periferik damar yolu güçlüğü nedeniyle yapıldı. Hastaların hiçbirinde işlem esnasında ve sonrasında komplikasyon izlenmedi. Yatırıldıkları bölümde takiplerinde 15 günlük süre içerisinde katater ile ilişkili enfeksiyon da saptanmadı.Sonuç Acil servislerde santral damar yolu gereksinimi sıktır. Kılavuzların önerisi doğrultusunda USG eşliğinde uygun şartlar altında yapılan girişimlerde komplikasyon riski yok denecek kadar azdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALOGLU, F. K., ACAR, N., OZAKIN, E., CAN, R., CEVİK, A. A. (2022). Acil Serviste Ultrasonografi Eşliğinde Takılan Santral Venöz Kataterlerin Komplikasyon Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Acil Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 53–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/625935

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramèr MR. Complications of central ve- nous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access--a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2002;30:454-60.
  2. Sznajder JI, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein S. Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:259-61. Bona RD. Thrombotic complications of central venous cathe- ters in cancer patients. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999;25:147- 55. Batra RK, Guleria S, Mandal S. Unusual complication of in- ternal jugular vein cannulation. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2002;44:137-9.
  3. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101:1644-55.
  4. Polderman KH, Girbes AJ. Central venous catheter use. Part 1: mechanical complications. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1-17.
  5. Silberzweig JE, Sacks D, Khorsandi AS, Bakal CW; Society of In- terventional Radiology Technology Assessment Committee. Reporting standards for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:443-52.
  6. Eisen LA, Narasimhan M, Berger JS, Mayo PH, Rosen MJ, Schneider RF. Mechanical complications of central venous catheters. J Intensive Care Med 2006;21:40-6.
  7. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1123-33. Brown S. Complications with the use of venous access devic- es. U.S. Pharmacist, 2002.
  8. Boyd R, Saxe A, Phillips E. Effect of patient position upon success in placing central venous catheters. Am J Surg 1996;172:380-2.
  9. Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE, Prudhomme M, Ripart J, Gouzes C, et al. Risk factors of failure and immediate com- plication of subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill pa- tients. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1036-41.
  10. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosoco- mial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:510-5.
  11. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravas- cular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002;51:1-29.
  12. Sherertz RJ, Ely EW, Westbrook DM, Gledhill KS, Streed SA, Kiger B, et al. Education of physicians-in-training can de- crease the risk for vascu