In introduction part, Turkish cannon law books were evaluated, and afterwards information bout Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Zahid and his work Tergib al-Salat is provided.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Tergib al-Salat, a canon law book which is known as belonging to Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Zahid with and in which we can see the orthographic peculiarities of Chagatay Turkish, is investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, Tergib al-Salat, a canon law book which is known as belonging to Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Zahid with and in which we can see the orthographic peculiarities of Chagatay Turkish, is investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In introduction part, Turkish cannon law books were evaluated, and afterwards information bout Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Zahid and his work Tergib al-Salat is provided.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this study, Tergib al-Salat, a canon law book which is known as belonging to Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Zahid with and in which we can see the orthographic peculiarities of Chagatay Turkish, is investigated. In introduction part, Turkish cannon law books were evaluated, and afterwards information bout Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Zahid and his work Tergib al-Salat is provided.
Özet
Bu çalısmada Çagatay Türkçesinin imlâ özelliklerini tam olarak görebilecegimiz Muhammed bin Ahmedü’z-Zâhid’e ait oldugu bilinen Tergibü’ş-Şalat adlı Çagatayca bir fıkıh kitabı incelenmistir. Giris kısmında Türkçe Fıkıh eserleri üzerine genel bir degerlendirme yapılmıs; daha sonra Ter&ibü’ş-Şalat ve onun müellifi hakkında bilgiler verilmistir.
🔖
Cite This Article
ERBAY, F. (2022). On the Çaghatay Language Copy of Tergib Al-Salat. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20, 189–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/625806
ERASLAN, Kemal (1996); Alî Şîr Nevâyî, Nesâyimü'l - Mahabbe min Şemâyimi'l - Fütüvve, Ankara:
Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
ERASLAN, Kemal (2001); Alî Şîr Nevâyî, Mecâlisü’n - Nefâyîs 1 - 2: 1: Giriş ve Metin, 2: Çeviri ve Notlar, Ankara:
Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
GÜLENSOY, Tuncer (1971); “Bursa Haraççıoğlu Kitaplığında Bulunan Türkçe Yazmalar Üzerine Notlar”, TDAY Belleten, s. 231-246, Ankara:
Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
KARASOY, Yakup (2004);
Satıraltı Tercümeli Bir Fıkıh Kitabı, Konya: SÜ Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Yayınları. KÂTİP ÇELEBİ (1971); Keşf-el-Zünûn, I. Cilt, II. Basım, İstanbul:
MEB Yayınları.
KÜGELGEN, Anke von ve diğ. (2000); “Muslim Culture in Russia and Central Asia”, vol. 3: Arabic, Persian and Turkic Manuscripts (15th-19th Centuries), Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, Islamkundliche Untersuchungen, (http://cess.fas.harvard. edu/cesr/html/CESR_03_2.html) (17.04.06). LEWİNSTEİN, Keith (1994); “Notes on Eastern Hanafite Heresiography”, The Journal of the American Oriental Society, Oct-Dec 1994, v114 n4 p583(16). MUHAMMED BİN AHMED ZAHİD EL-BÛNÎ (1994); Tergībü’ş-Şalāt ve Teysīrü’l- Ahkām, İstanbul: Hakikat Kitâbevi. MUMİNOV, Ashirbek (2006); “Traditional And Modern Religious –Theological Schools In Central Asia”, http://www.ca-c.org/dataeng/09.muminov.shtml (17.04.2006).
ORAL SEYHAN, Tanju (2004); Mübeyyen Der Fı^h (Giriş-Metin-Dizin-Tıpkıbasım), İstanbul: