Microbiologic evaluation of vaginal discharge

Objective & Hypothesis:In the specimens taken from 154 patients who had vaginal discharge, the microorganisms S.aureus ( 29 %), Candida spp (16 %), E.coli (10 %), Enterococcus spp (8 %), G.vaginalis (5 %) were isolated by using routine culture methods.

📊

Key Findings & Data:In the specimens taken from 154 patients who had vaginal discharge, the microorganisms S.aureus ( 29 %), Candida spp (16 %), E.coli (10 %), Enterococcus spp (8 %), G.vaginalis (5 %) were isolated by using routine culture methods.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:T.vaginalis was determined as (3 %) by direct preparation method.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the specimens taken from 154 patients who had vaginal discharge, the microorganisms S.aureus ( 29 %), Candida spp (16 %), E.coli (10 %), Enterococcus spp (8 %), G.vaginalis (5 %) were isolated by using routine culture methods. T.vaginalis was determined as (3 %) by direct preparation method.

Özet

Vajinal akıntısı olan 154 hastadan alınan örneklerden S.aureus (% 29), Candida spp (% 16), E.coli (% 10), Enterococcus spp (% 8), G.vaginalis (% 5) mikroorganizmaları izole edildi. Direkt preparatta % 3 oranında T.vaginalis görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYHAN, N., BAŞBUĞ, N., HAKBİLEN, S. (2022). Microbiologic evaluation of vaginal discharge. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2, 7–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/625312

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

Bilgehan H, KIinik Mikrobiyolojik Tam. Izmir, 364, 1992 2- Jawetz E, Me!nick jig Adelbarg E A, Brooks, GE, Bute! JS, Oros on Lrl,Medicai Microbiology, Eighteenth Edition, Printed in the Unitect States of America, 273. 1989. 3. Çetin ET, Tereci K, Ang O, Gene! ye Pratik Mikrobiyoloil. 3. Baski., Serene? istanbui, 378-379. 596, 1973 4. Tümbay E Pratik Tip Mikelotisi 1. Bask, Bilgehan Basfrrevi. izirlir, 58-59. 1983. 5- f.flalows A, 1-fausler WJ, Herrmann K.f_, Isenberg HD, Shadowy HJ, Manual of cilnicat Ivi,crobiology. 17: 483-484, 12,19, -11ft ea. Washington, D.C., 1991, 6- ilybakowski Grys E, Aerobic micro:lora of the vaginal vestibule vagina:
{,rni: nrrt uterine cervix in women with nr.-rnai pregnancy and with imminent premature deilvery Gynakol. lcic,:17}: f,3,1 144, 1983. 7- Slotnick 11 et a!, Microbiolocy of t-ie fernale- genital tract. IV, Cervical and vaginal flora during pregnancy., Obst. and Gynec. 21: 312, 1963. 8- Walsh H et •ll.: Further eb,serwith,:ins tire rnicr'obi3:cn'c flora of the and vagina during pregnancy Am,J. Obc.toI. Gyne,c„ 1966. 9- Hawkinsen JA, r,ichtilman I. Prematurity associated and faginiti dt.irIno ptacinancy., Amer. J. Obst. r.9yneo. 94 (71 f 998,902, 1996. 10- Qanga S, Vz1in i har_italiklart 'vu it is ‘gr2rittalfs. 1-
Cargo 1379, Api,ar,=1 11- Rein HE, anri ceri.rAis. 951-96i: fri ff./Lir:def.
GL, JE ?rincipfes art at largo-w.f.:us EDicences. 19::19, rd ed. C.hurc:f1:1I stone, New Ydik. 16- Uraz G, Yücel N. Berkman, 162 Kadin hastada vajen ve serviks mikrobiyak flora dagilimi ye enfeksiyon etkeni patojen mIkroorganizmalarin tanimi, Tiirk Hij.Den,Biyol.Derg., 43 (2): 137.156, 1986 17- Konje JC, et al. The prevalence of Gardneralle vaginalis. Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans in the Cytology Clinic at Ibadan, Higeria. Afr. J. Med. Sci., 20 (1) 29-34, 1991. 18- Cengiz AT, Ataoglu H, Cengiz L, Seyhun A, Giilmezoglu M, tic A, Vaginal akintilardan izoie edilen Candida Mikrobiyol. BOIL, 23 (4): 275-285, 1989. 19- Koksalan H, Esen N, cagatay H, Thick H, Mart A, Vajinal aktnti Orneklerinden Gardnerella vaginaks'in izolasyonu, Mikrobiyol. BOIL 27 (3): 191-195, 1993. 20- Yavuzdemir S, Bengisun 5, Gungor C, ciftciodlu N, Ozenci H, Vardar G, Vajinal akintisi olan kadinlarda G. vaginails, Mikoplazma, Ureaplazma, T.vaginalis, maya ye N. gonorrhocae ye dider bakterilerin Mikrobiyol, Balt., 26 (2): 139-148, 1992. 21- Kilik N, Fazli SA, Ozbal Y, Bakteriyolojik inceleme icin gonderilen Vajina akint!si arnekleri