Journals / Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 1

The investigation of resistance to oral antibiotics in Escherichia coli isolates obtained from urine

İdrar örneklerinden izole edilen Escherichia coli izolatlarında oral antibiyotiklere karşı direncin araştırılması

Pages
11–15
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

NIT and FMT are thought to be suitable alternatives in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Urinary tract infection is one of the most common bacterial diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Isolates were then prepared from the ones with an F. coli count of 107ml or more.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:NIT and FMT are thought to be suitable alternatives in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Urinary tract infection is one of the most common bacterial diseases. As a result of the increasing resistance to antibiotics in recent years, some problems have been encountered in empiric treatment of urinary tract infection. The aim of the present study is to assess the resistance of uropathogen Escherichia coli isolates to oral antibiotics. Method: Samples were taken from middle urine and were counted for F. coli. Isolates were then prepared from the ones with an F. coli count of 107ml or more. The isolates were analysed by using colonial morphology, gram staining and biochemical test results. The susceptibility of the isolates was evaluated by disc diffusion method in compliance with NCCLS susceptibility testing guidelines. F. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the control strain. Results were evaluated by Chi-square test. Results: The F. coli of the isolates were found to have low resistance rates to nitrofurantoin, fosfomisin, trometamol and cefixime; and high resistance rates to ampicillin and amoxicillin. Conclusion: Based on the results, ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin/sulbaktam, amoxicillin /clavulonic acid and trimetoprim /sulfometaksazol may prove to be ineffective in the empiric treatment of urinary tract infection in our region. In order to reduce the resistance development and the common use of quinolones, second and third generation oral cefalosporins can be used in place of these medicines. NIT and FMT are thought to be suitable alternatives in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection.

Özet

Amaç: Üriner sistem enfeksiyonu (ÜSE) toplumda en sık rastlanan bakteri enfeksiyonlarındandır. Son yıllarda antibiyotiklere karşı direncin giderek artması nedeniyle ÜSE'lerin ampirik tedavisinde sorunlar başlamıştır. Bu çalışmada üropatojen Escherichia coll izolatlarımn tedavi de kullanılan oral antibiyotiklere karşı dirençleri araştırılmıştır. Yöntem: Orta akım idrar örneklerinden koloni morfolojisi, Gram yöntemiyle boyanma özelliği ve biyokimyasal test sonuçlarıyla E.coli olarak izole edilen, 107ml ve üzeri CFU oluşturan izolatlar değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. İzolatlann duyarlılıkları NCCLS kriterlerine uygun olarak disk difüzyon yöntemi ile değerlendirilmiş ve kontrol susu olarak E.coü ATCC 25922 kullanılmıştır. İstatistiksel değerlendirmede ki kare testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: İzolatlarda en düşük direnç oranı nitrofurantoin, fosfomisin trometamol ve sefiksime, en yüksek direnç oranı da ampisilin ve amoksisiline karşı saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Bölgemizde üriner sistem enfeksiyonları ampirik tedavisinde ampisilin, amoksisüin, ampisilin/sulbaktam, amoksisilin/klavulonik asit ve trimetoprim/ sulfometaksazol kullanımı başarısızlığa neden olabilir. Kinolonlann yaygın tüketimini ve direnç gelişimini azaltmak için bu grup ilaçların yerine ikinci veya üçüncü kuşak oral sefalosporinlerin kullanılması düşünülebilir. Komplike olmayan ÜSE'lerin tedavisinde nitrofurantoin ve fosfomisin uygun bir seçenek olarak görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAÇMAZ, B., SULTAN, N., AKSOY, A. (2022). The investigation of resistance to oral antibiotics in Escherichia coli isolates obtained from urine. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 1, 11–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/625256

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Sobel JD, Kaye D. Urinary tract infections. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2000; 773-805
  2. Ertugrul MB, Atila-Güleç L, Akal D ve ark. Üropatojen Escherichia coli suşlarının tedavide sık kullanılan antibiyotiklere duyarlılıkları. Klinik Derg 2004; 17(2): 132-6
  3. Chomarat M. Resistance of bacteria in urinary tract infections. Int JAntimicrob Agents 2000; 16(4): 483-7
  4. Warren JW, Abrutyn E, Hebel JR, Johnson JR, Schaeffer AJ, Stamm AE. Guidelines for antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis in women. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 745-58
  5. Kahlmeter G. An international survey of the anti microbial susceptibility of pathogens from uncomplicated urinary tract infections: the ECO.SENS Project. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 51:69-76
  6. Gales AC, Sader HS, Jones RN, The SENTRY participants group (Latin America). Urinary tract infections trends in Latin American hospitals: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1997-2000). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 44:289-99
  7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standarts for Antimicrobial Disk Suscep tibility Tests. Approved Standard. NCCLS Document M2 A7. Wayne, Pa: NCCLS, 2000
  8. Kaye KS, Gold HS, Schwaber MJ, et al. Variety of fi lactamases produced by amoxicillin-clavulanate-resis tant Escherichia coli isolated in the Northeastern United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:1520-5
  9. Oliver A, Perez-Vazquez M, Martinez-Ferrer M, Baquero F, DE Rafael L, Canton R. Ampicillin- sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli isolates with different $beta$-lactam resistance phenotypes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:862-7. 10.Kahlmeter G. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens in uncomplicated cystitis in Europe. The ECO.SENS study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003:22:49-52. 11.Lau SM, Peng MY, Chang FY. Resistance rates to commonly used antimicrobials among pathogens of both bacteremic and non-bacteremic community-acquired urinary tract infection. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2004; 37:185-91. 12.Colodner R, Keness Y, Chazan B, Raz R. Antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired uropathogens in northern Israel. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001; 18: 189-92. 13.Karlowsky JA, Kelly LJ, Thomsberry C, Jones ME, Sahm DF. Trends in