Journals / Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 2

Changes in concepts of the technological progress: personalized medicine

Tıpta teknolojik gelişimin neden olduğu kavram değişimleri: kişiselleştirilmiş tıp

Pages
54–59
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With thesupport of institutions like Food Drug Administration (FDA) for the control and evaluationestablishments, a rapid turn to personalized medicine has begun.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:People are differently.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This difference is reflected in medicine from diagnosis to therapy.Why were standart doses of pharmaceuticals ineffective for some patients?
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With thesupport of institutions like Food Drug Administration (FDA) for the control and evaluationestablishments, a rapid turn to personalized medicine has begun.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

People are differently. This difference is reflected in medicine from diagnosis to therapy.Why were standart doses of pharmaceuticals ineffective for some patients? Why in some casesside effects are common and in some no side effects are seen? Why were some people sufferedfrom cancer , and some are not? The answer to all these questions is “personalized medicine”.Past and partly today's medicine is based on “one size fits to all ” concept, and covers thedifferences of “statistically significance ranges”. In personalized medicine the expression is:“proper drug in proper dose in the limits of proper diagnosis and therapy for correct patient incorrect time”. It means that, knowledge about the genetic variation can provide therapy forpatients and preventive scanning of the risk group, and with the use of lower drug doses protectfrom the preventable side effects. As a result, genomic, proteomic pharmacogenomic studies, bioinformatics evaluations,that have resulted from advanced technology, have changed the modern medicine. With thesupport of institutions like Food Drug Administration (FDA) for the control and evaluationestablishments, a rapid turn to personalized medicine has begun.

Özet

İnsanlar farklıdırlar . Bu farklılık, tıbba, tanıdan sağaltıma kadar yansır . Niçin bazı hastalarastandart dozda verilen ilaçlar hiç etkili olmaz? Niçin bazılarında ilaçların yan etkileri görülür dediğerlerinde görülmez? Niçin bazı insanlar kanser olur da diğerleri olmaz? İşte bu sorularınyanıtı “Kişiselleştirilmiş Tıp” tır . Geçmiş ve kısmen günümüzün tıbbı, tek ölçüt ve dozunherkese uygun olduğu temeline dayalıdır ve “istatistiki olarak anlamlılık sınırları” içindekideğişimleri kapsar . Kişiselleştirilmiş tıpta ise söylem “ doğru zamanda, doğru hasta için,konulan kişisel uygun tanı ve sağaltım içinde, uygun dozda ve uygun ilaç” şeklinde olmaktadır .Bunun anlamı; genetik çeşitlilik hakkında bilinenlerin, daha düşük ilaç dozu ile sağaltılacakhastayı önlenebilir yan etkilerden koruyabilmesi ve risk altında olan grubun hastalıkbaşlamadan önleyici izlem ve sağaltımını sağlayabilmesidir . Sonuç olarak; gelişen teknolojinin getirdiği genom, proteom, farmakogenom çalışmaları,biyoinformatik değerlendirmeler , modern tıbbı değiştirmiştir . “Herkese tek boyut” yaklaşımıeskilerde kalmıştır . Amerikan Gıda ve İlaç Kurumu (FDA) gibi kontrol ve değerlendirmekuruluşlarının farmakogenom çalışmalarını desteklemesi ile kişiselleştirilmiş tıbba hızlı birdönüşüm başlamıştır .

🔖

Cite This Article

BASKIN, Y. (2022). Changes in concepts of the technological progress: personalized medicine. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 2, 54–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/625237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Genomics at the FDA www. fda. gov/ cder/ genomics/ download time:12.02.2007. 2.Personalized Medicine Coalition www. personalized medicinecoalition.org/ download time: 26.10.2006. 3.Chang-Claude J, Andrieu N, Rookus M, et al. and Epidemiological Study of Familial Breast Cancer (EMBRACE)
  2. Gene Etude Prospective Sein Ovaire (GENEPSO)
  3. Genen Omgeving studie van de werkgroep Hereditiair Borstkanker Onderzoek Nederland (GEO HEBON)
  4. International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study (IBCCS) collaborators group. Age at menarche and menopause and breast cancer risk in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2007
  5. 16(4):740-46. 4.Eisen A, Lubinski J, Klijn J et al. Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. J Clin Oncol, 2005
  6. 23(30):7491-96. 5.Turnbull C, Hodgson S. Genetic predisposition to cancer Clin Med, 2005
  7. 5(5):491-98. 6.Couch FJ, Johnson MR, Rabe KG et al. The prevalence of BRCA2 mutations in familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2007
  8. 16(2):342-46. 7.Baselga J, Perez EA, Pienkowski T, Bell R. Adjuvant trastuzumab: a milestone in the treatment of HER2 positive early breast cancer. Oncologist, 2006
  9. 11 Suppl 1: 4-12. 8.Marsh S, McLeod HL. Pharmacogenomics: from bedside to clinical practice. Hum Mol Genet, 2006
  10. 15 Spec No 1:R 89-93. 9.The FDA' s National Center for Toxicological Research www. fda.gov/nctr/ download time 12.02.2007. 10.Marsh S. Impact of pharmacogenomics on clinical practice in oncology. Mol Diagn Ther, 2007
  11. 11(2):79-82. 11.Imyanitov EN, Moiseyenko VM. Molecular-based choice of cancer therapy: realities and expectations. Clin Chim Acta, 2007
  12. 379(1-2):1-13. 12.The CDC' s Office of Genomics and Disease Prevention www. cdc.gov/genomics/ download time 24.02.2007. 13.Smith RD, Thorsteinsdottir H, Daar AS, Gold ER, Singers PA. Genomics knowledge and equity: a global public goods perspective of the patent system. Bull World Health Organ, 2004
  13. 82(5):385-89. 14.Bates BR, Poirot K, Harris TM, Condit CM, Achter PJ. Evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing of race based pharmacogenomics: a focus group study of public understandings of applied genomic medication. J Health Commun, 2004
  14. 9(6):541-59. 15.World Health Organization. Genomics and world health. Report of the Advisory Committee on Health Research. Geneva, World Health Organization 2002
  15. World Health Organization. Genomics and world health. Report o