Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Koroner arter baypas greftlemenin aort fonksiyonları üzerine etkisi

The effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on aortic functions

Pages
19–25
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Aortic cross-sectional complianceincreased from preoperative 2.62±1.5 cm2/mmHg to3.52±1.6 cm2/mmHg at three months (p=0.21), and to3.79±1.5 cm2/mmHg at six months (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background:­ This study aims to investigate the effectof coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on aorticfunctions.Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients (mean age 61.6±9.4years) with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) whounderwent CABG surgery with cardiopulmonary bypassby the same surgical team were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aortic function indices such as aortic cross-sectionalcompliance, aortic distensibility, and aortic stiffness indexwere calculated by echocardiography preoperatively, and atthird and six months postoperatively.Results:­ Aortic functions of patients with severe or extensiveCAD with high Gensini score (mean 98.3±38.1) improvedat postoperative period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Aortic cross-sectional complianceincreased from preoperative 2.62±1.5 cm2/mmHg to3.52±1.6 cm2/mmHg at three months (p=0.21), and to3.79±1.5 cm2/mmHg at six months (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background:­ This study aims to investigate the effectof coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on aorticfunctions.Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients (mean age 61.6±9.4years) with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) whounderwent CABG surgery with cardiopulmonary bypassby the same surgical team were included in this study. Theseverity of the disease was calculated by the Gensini scoreindex. Aortic function indices such as aortic cross-sectionalcompliance, aortic distensibility, and aortic stiffness indexwere calculated by echocardiography preoperatively, and atthird and six months postoperatively.Results:­ Aortic functions of patients with severe or extensiveCAD with high Gensini score (mean 98.3±38.1) improvedat postoperative period. Aortic cross-sectional complianceincreased from preoperative 2.62±1.5 cm2/mmHg to3.52±1.6 cm2/mmHg at three months (p=0.21), and to3.79±1.5 cm2/mmHg at six months (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada koroner arter baypas greftleme(KABG)nin aortik fonksiyonlar üzerindeki etkisiincelendi.Ça­lış­ma­pla­nı:­ Aynı cerrahi ekip tarafındankardiyopulmoner baypas ile KABG ameliyatı yapılançokdamar koroner arter hastalığı (KAH) olan ardışık32 hasta (ort. yaş 61.6±9.4 yıl) çalışmaya alındı.Hastalığın şiddeti Gensini skor indeksi ile hesaplandı.Aortik kesit uyumu, aortik esneklik ve aortik sertleşmegibi aortik fonksiyon indeksleri ekokardiyografi ileameliyat öncesi dönemde ve ameliyat sonrası üçüncüve altıncı aylarda hesaplandı.Bul gu lar: Aortik fonksiyonlar yüksek Gensini skoru(ortalama 98.3±38.1) ile ciddi veya yaygın KAHsi olanhastalarda ameliyat sonrası dönemde iyileşti. Aortikkesit uyumu ameliyat öncesi 2.62±1.5 cm2/mmHgdenameliyat sonrası üçüncü ayda 3.52±1.6 cm2/mmHye(p=0.21) ve altıncı ayda 3.79±1.5 cm2 /mmHgye (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TENEKECİOĞLU, E., KARAAĞAÇ, K., TOPAL, D., VATANSEVER, F. A., ARICAN, Ö. Ö., ERDOLU, B., YAVUZ, Ş., YILMAZ, M. (2022). Koroner arter baypas greftlemenin aort fonksiyonları üzerine etkisi. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/624587

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Zieman SJ, Melenovsky V, Kass DA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and therapy of arterial stiffness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:932-43
  2. Giannattasio C, Mancia G. Arterial distensibility in humans. Modulating mechanisms, alterations in diseases and effects of treatment. J Hypertens 2002;20:1889-99
  3. Pitsavos C, Toutouzas K, Dernellis J, Skoumas J, Skoumbourdis E, Stefanadis C, et al. Aortic stiffness in young patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Am Heart J 1998;135:604-8
  4. Vlachopoulos C, Kosmopoulou F, Panagiotakos D, Ioakeimidis N, Alexopoulos N, Pitsavos C, et al. Smoking and caffeine have a synergistic detrimental effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflections. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1911-7
  5. Elbasan Z, Şahin DY, Gür M, Gözübüyük G, Akıllı RE, Koyunsever NY, et al. Aortic distensibility and extent and complexity of coronary artery disease in patients with stable hypertensive and nonhypertensive coronary artery disease. Med Princ Pract 2013;22:260-4
  6. Carlucci F, Tabucchi A, Biagioli B, Simeone F, Scolletta S, Rosi F, et al. Cardiac surgery: myocardial energy balance, antioxidant status and endothelial function after ischemia- reperfusion. Biomed Pharmacother 2002;56:483-91. 7 Dhalla NS, Elmoselhi AB, Hata T, Makino N. Status of myocardial antioxidants in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 2000;47:446-56
  7. Park S, Lakatta EG. Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of arterial stiffness. Yonsei Med J 2012;53:258-61. 9. van Bussel BC, Schouten F, Henry RM, Schalkwijk CG, de Boer MR, Ferreira I, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and low-grade inflammation are associated with greater arterial stiffness over a 6-year period. Hypertension 2011;58:588-95
  8. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978;58:1072-83
  9. Stratos C, Stefanadis C, Kallikazaros I, Boudoulas H, Toutouzas P. Ascending aorta distensibility abnormalities in hypertensive patients and response to nifedipine administration. Am J Med 1992;93:505-12
  10. Barbetseas J, Alexopoulos N, Brili S, Aggeli C, Marinakis N, Vlachopoulos C, et al. Changes in aortic root function after valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol 2006;110:74-9
  11. Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:606
  12. Nemes A, Galema TW