Surgical treatment in acute coronary syndromes

Objective & Hypothesis:In the modern management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), early invasive management and prompt revascularization have emerged as important goals for improving patient outcomes.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Among patients ultimately undergoing revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting remains a common revascularization option despite recent advances in interventional cardiology.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:We aimed to evaluate surgical treatment in patients with ACS in this review.

🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the modern management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), early invasive management and prompt revascularization have emerged as important goals for improving patient outcomes. Among patients ultimately undergoing revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting remains a common revascularization option despite recent advances in interventional cardiology. However, surgical revascularization is associated with greater delays when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention. We aimed to evaluate surgical treatment in patients with ACS in this review.

Özet

Akut koroner sendrom (AKS) kliniği ile gelen hastaların modern yönetiminde erken invazif yaklaşım ve derhal revaskülarizasyon, hasta sonuçlarını iyileştirmek için önemli bir amaç olarak belirmektedir. Sonuçta revaskülarizasyona giden hastalar arasında koroner arter baypas greftleme (KABG) operasyonu girişimsel kardiyolojideki ilerlemelere rağmen yaygın bir revaskülarizasyon seçeneği olmaya devam etmektedir. Bununla birlikte cerrahi revaskülarizasyon perkütan koroner girişim ile karşılaştırıldığında daha fazla gecikme ile ilişkilidir. Biz bu derlemede AKS'li hastalarda cerrahi tedavinin yerini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, T., ARAS, D., KORKMAZ, Ş. (2022). Surgical treatment in acute coronary syndromes. Türk Girişimsel Kardiyoloji Derg., Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 73–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/624453

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KAA ve ark. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1809-40
Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, ve ark. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1366-74
Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, ve ark. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2003;24:28-66
Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, ve.ark. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:210-47
Antman EM, Fox KM. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: proposed revisions. International Cardiology Forum. Am Heart J 2000;139:461-75
Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, ve ark. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso- ciation Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:974
Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, ve ark. TACTICS (Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 18 Investigators. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable c