Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

The effects of desflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia on recovery in geriatric patients

Genel anestezi uygulanan geriatrik olgularda sevofluran ve desfluranın derlenmeye etkileri

Pages
123–127
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Durations of the extubation and awakening times and recovery scores did not differ significantly(p>0.05).We concluded that both drugs provided hemodynamic stability and early recovery in geriatric patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of desflurane orsevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative recovery in geriatric patients.Forty ASA I-III geriatric patients undergoing elective urologicsurgery were randomly assigned to two groups equal in number.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Anesthesia was induced with the use of 1 mg/kg fentanyl, 2 mg/kg thiopental, and 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Durations of the extubation and awakening times and recovery scores did not differ significantly(p>0.05).We concluded that both drugs provided hemodynamic stability and early recovery in geriatric patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of desflurane orsevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative recovery in geriatric patients.Forty ASA I-III geriatric patients undergoing elective urologicsurgery were randomly assigned to two groups equal in number. Anesthesia was induced with the use of 1 mg/kg fentanyl, 2 mg/kg thiopental, and 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium. Maintenance ofanesthesia was obtained in with 3% desflurane in one group, and with 2 % sevoflurane in the other. Both groups received remifentanil infusion at 0.25 mg/kg/min from the onset of surgical incision. Systolic, diastolic, and the mean arterial pressures, heart rate, andperipheral oxygen saturation were monitored during anesthesia.Durations of the awakening times and extubation times wererecorded and postanesthetic recovery scores were calculated in both groups.There were no statistical significant differences recordingdemographic characteristics between the groups(p>0.05). Durations of the extubation and awakening times and recovery scores did not differ significantly(p>0.05).We concluded that both drugs provided hemodynamic stability and early recovery in geriatric patients.

Özet

Çalışmamızda, geriatrik olgularda sevofluran veya desfluran kullanılmasının derlenme sürecine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı.Elektif ürolojik girişim planlanan, ASA I-III olan, 65 yaş ve üzerindeki 40 hasta rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Genel anestezi uygulamasında, indüksiyon için 1 mg/kg fentanil, 2 mg/kg pentotal ve 0.1 mg/kg vekuronyum uygulanarak entübasyon sağlandı. Anestezi idamesi bir grupta % 2 konsantrasyonda sevofluran, diğer grupta % 3 konsantrasyonda desfluran ile sağlandı. İki grupta da cerrahi insizyonla birlikte 0.25 mg/kg/dk hızında remifentanil infüzyonuna başlandı. Anestezi süresince olguların kalp atım hızı, sistolik, diyastolik ve ortalama arter basınçları ile periferik oksijen satürasyonu değerleri; anestezinin sonlanmasından sonra ise postoperatif uyanma zamanı, ekstübasyon zamanı ve anestezi sonrası derlenme skorları kaydedildi.Grupların demografik özelliklerinde ve hemodinamik değerlerinde istatistiksel fark belirlenmedi(p>0.05). Uyanma zamanı, ekstübasyon zamanı ve anestezi sonrası derlenme skorları açısından anlamlı fark saptanmadı(p>0.05).Her iki ilacın da geriatrik olgularda iyi bir hemodinamik stabilite ve erken derlenme sağladığı kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIKAN, Z., ERKAL, H., ÖZYURT, Y. (2022). The effects of desflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia on recovery in geriatric patients. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 123–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/624378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924-34
  2. Klopfenstein CE, Herrmann FR, Michel JP, et al. The influence of an aging surgical population on the anesthesia workload. A ten year survey. Anasth Analg 1998; 86: 1165-70
  3. Elar Z. Klinik Anestezi El Kitabı. Geriatrik Anestezi. Logos Yayınc ılık, 3. Baskı, Istanbul 1999, 442-51
  4. Biebuyck JF, Eger EI II. New inhaled anesthetics Anesthesiology 1994; 4:906-18
  5. Dupont J, Tavarnier B, Ghosez Y, Durinck L, Thevenot A, Moktadir- Chalons N, Ruyffelaere-Moises L, Decklerck N, Scherpereel P. Recovery after anesthesia for pulmonary surgery; desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 355-9
  6. Tarazi EM, Phikip BK. A comparison of recovery after sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory anesthesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1998; 10: 272-7
  7. Eger EI, Bowland T, Ionescu P, Laster MJ, Fang Z, Gong D, Sonner J, Weiskopf RB. Recovery and kinetic characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane in volunteers after 8-h exposure, including kinetics of degradation products. Anesthesiology 1997; 67: 517-26
  8. Chen X, Zhao M, White PF, Li S, Tang J, Wender RH, Sloninsky A, Naruse R, Kariger R, Webb T, Norel E. The recovery of cognitive function after general anesthesia in elderly patients: a comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 1489-94
  9. Nathanson MH, Fredman B, Smith I, White PF. Sevoflurane versus desflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison of maintenence and recovery profiles. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 1186-90
  10. Goeters C, van Aken H. Why the new inhalation agents? Eur J Anesthesiol 1999; 16: 583-4.