SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of fall and fall predictıon index in patıents with stroke

İnmeli hastalarda düşme ve düşme tahmin indeksinin değerlendirilmesi

Ebru ALEMDAROĞLU
Filiz SİVAS
Halil UÇAN
Özge YILDIRIM
Nihal TEZEL
Hatice BODUR
Pages
55–61
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this way the modifiable falls risk factors can be overviewed and regulated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study we investigated the relation of the fall prediction index with the stroke risk factors and the functional status of the stroke patients.Materials and Method: Forty stroke patients and 22 healthy subjects recruited to the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fall Prediction Index (FPI) was calculated for each patient and control.Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.40 ± 10.65 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this way the modifiable falls risk factors can be overviewed and regulated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: In this study we investigated the relation of the fall prediction index with the stroke risk factors and the functional status of the stroke patients.Materials and Method: Forty stroke patients and 22 healthy subjects recruited to the study. The patients and the control group were investigated about the risk factors of stroke. All the subjects were evaluated with Mini Mental State Examination Test (MMSET), Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Functional Ambulation Scale (FAS). Fall Prediction Index (FPI) was calculated for each patient and control.Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.40 ± 10.65 years. The most frequent stroke risk factor was hypertansion (75 %). FPI was significantly correlated with FAS, motor FIM score and MRS. Eighteen of the forty patients had fallen at least once. There were no difference about the stroke risk factors between the fallers and the non-fallers patients. FAS was significantly lower in the patients who had fallen. FPI was significantly correlated with MRS, FAS, FIM motor and cognitive scores in the fallers and also FPI was significantly correlated with MRS, FAS and FIM motor scores in the non-fallers.Conclusion: Stroke is the most important cause of disability in the geriatric age group. The patients at risk for falls can be defined by applying FPI. In this way the modifiable falls risk factors can be overviewed and regulated.

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmada inmeli hastalarda düşme tahmin indeksi (DTİ)'nin inme risk faktörleri ve hastaların fonksiyonel durumu ile arasındaki ilişki araştırıldı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 40 inmeli hasta ve 22 sağlıklı birey alındı. Hastalar ve kontrol grubu inme risk faktörleri yönünden araştırıldı. Tüm hastalar Mini Mental Durum testi (MMDT), Modifiye Rankin skalası (MRS), Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçütü (FBÖ), Fonksiyonei Ambulasyon Sınıflaması (FAS) kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Hastaların Düşme Tahmin İndeksleri (DTİ) hesaplandı.Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 64.40 ± 10.65 yıl idi. En sık görülen risk faktörü hipertansiyondu (%75). DTİ ile FAS, motor FBÖ ve MRS arasında anlamlı korelasyon saptandı. Çalışmaya alınan inmeli 40 hastanın 18'i en az 1 kez düşmüştü. Düşen ve düşmeyen hastalar arasında inme risk faktörleri yönünden farka rastlanmadı. Düşen hastalarda sadece FAS düşmeyen hastalara göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı oranda düşüktü. Düşen hastalarda DTİ ile MRS, FAS, motor ve kognitif FBÖ arasında, düşmeyen hastalarda ise DTİ ile MRS, FAS ve motor FBÖ arasında korelasyon saptandı.Sonuç: İnme geriatrik yaş grubu hastalarda en önemli disabilite nedenlerinden biridir. DTİ uygulanarak düşme risk olan hastalar belirlenebilir. Böylece düşme risk faktörlerinin gözden geçirilmesi, değiştirilebilir risk faktörlerinin düzenlenmesi sağlanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALEMDAROĞLU, E., SİVAS, F., UÇAN, H., YILDIRIM, Ö., TEZEL, N., BODUR, H. (2022). Evaluation of fall and fall predictıon index in patıents with stroke. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 55–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/624193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Utku U. ‹nme tanımı, etiyolojisi, sınıflandırma ve risk faktör leri. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg 2007;53 (Özel Sayı 1):1-3
  2. Sacco RL, Benjamin EJ, Broderick JP, et al. Risk Factors. Stro ke 1997;28:1507-1517
  3. Chan BKS, Marshall LM, Winters KM, Faulkner KA, Schwartz AV, Orwoll ES. Incident fall risk and phtsical activity and phtsical performance among older men: The osteoporotic frac tures in men study. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:696-703
  4. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Patient falls in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1995;26:838-842
  5. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Fall prediction index for patients in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1997;28:716-721
  6. Olsson E, Löfgren B, Gustafson Y, Nyberg L. Validation of a fall risk index in stroke rehabilitation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;14(1):23-28
  7. Mayo NE, korner-Bitensky N, Kaizer F. Relationship between response time and falls among stroke patients undergoing physical rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 1990;13:47-55
  8. Rapport LJ, Webster JS, Flemming KL, et al. Predictors of falls among right-hemisphere stroke patients in the rehabilitation setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:621-626
  9. Küçükdeveci A, Kutlay fi, Elhan AH, Tennanat A. Preliminary study to evaluate the validity of the mini-mental state examina tion in a normal population in Turkey. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28(1):77-9
  10. Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2001;15(3):311-9. 11. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604-7
  11. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for ne urologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assess ment. Phys Ther 1986;66:1530-9
  12. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Stu dies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. J Am Med As soc 1963;185:914-919
  13. Albert ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 1973; 23:658-664
  14. Freidman PJ. Spatial neglect in acute stroke: The line bisection test. Scand J Rehab Med 1990; 22:101-106
  15. Fugl-Meyer AR, JaasköL, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient, I: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31
  16. Karatepe Göksel A, Kaya T, fien N, Günaydın R, Gedizlioğlu M. inmeli hastalarda risk faktörleri