Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

THE comparative evaluation of audiometry, otoacoustic emission (OAE), and brainstem audiometry findings in presbycusis

Presbiakuzide; saf ses ve konuşma odyometrisi, otoakustik emisyon (OAE) ve beyin sapı odyometrisi incelemelerinin karşılaştırmalı değerlendirilmesi

Pages
172–177
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) results and auditory brainstem responses were recorded to evaluate hearing loss.Results: Our findings demonstrated that pure tone average and speech reception threshold values significantly increased (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: “Presbycusis” is the sensorineural hearing loss accompanying the aging process (1,2).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The pathologic basis of presbycusis is partially understood.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) results and auditory brainstem responses were recorded to evaluate hearing loss.Results: Our findings demonstrated that pure tone average and speech reception threshold values significantly increased (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: “Presbycusis” is the sensorineural hearing loss accompanying the aging process (1,2). The pathologic basis of presbycusis is partially understood. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of peripheral and central auditory pathways in presbycusis and to localise the pathology by using pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and auditory brainstem responses (ABR).Materials and Method: Forty patients with presbycusis, who applied to our clinic, were included in the study. Pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) results and auditory brainstem responses were recorded to evaluate hearing loss.Results: Our findings demonstrated that pure tone average and speech reception threshold values significantly increased (p

Özet

Giriş: Yaşlanma sürecinde oluşan sensorinöral (S/N) işitme kaybına “presbiakuzi” denir (1,2). Presbiakuzinin patolojik temeli kısmen anlaşılabilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı presbiakuziyle ortaya çıkan değişiklikleri, presbiakuzinin patolojik lokalizasyonunu, periferik ve santral işitsel yolların bozulmasını; saf ses odyometrisi, konuşma odyometrisi, distorsiyon ürünü otoakustik emisyon (DPOAE), beyin sapı odyometrisi (İşitsel Beyin Sapı Cevapları, ABR) kullanarak, değerlendirmek ve belirlemektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimize başvuran 40 presbiakuzili hasta çalışma kapsamına alındı. Hastaların işitmeleri odyoloji ünitesi'nde saf ses odyometrisi, konuşma odyometrisi, DPOAE ve ABR kayıtları yapılarak değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Elde ettiğimiz bulgulara göre yaşın artmasıyla birlikte saf ses odyometride elde edilen saf ses ortalaması (SSO) ve konuşmayı alma eşiğin (KAE)'de anlamlı düzeyde (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALGÜNER, M., GERÇEKER, M., BOYNUKALIN, K. Ş. (2022). THE comparative evaluation of audiometry, otoacoustic emission (OAE), and brainstem audiometry findings in presbycusis. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 172–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/624149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Babin RW. Effects of Aging on the Auditory and Vestibular Systems. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Richardson MA, Schuller DE, (Ed): Otolaryngo- logy Head & Neck Surgery. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, 1993, pp 3020-30
  2. Jennings CR, Jones NS. Presbyacusis J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115: 171-8
  3. Katz J (Ed): Handbook of Clinical Aud›ology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994, pp 271-567
  4. Mufl N, Özdamar Ö (Ed): işitsel Beyin Sapı Cevapları ‘Temel Bilgiler ve Klinik Uygulamaları. Ankara 1996, pp 57-159
  5. Hall JW (Ed): Handbook of Otoacoustic Emissions. Singular Publishing Group, Florida 1999, pp 95-258
  6. Hall JW. (Ed): Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Allyn and Bacon, Massachusetts 1992, pp 335-419
  7. Schuknecht HF, Gacek MR. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 1-16
  8. Canalis RF, Lampert PR (Ed): The Ear Chomprehensive Otology. LWW Publishers, Philadelphia 2000, pp 157-295
  9. Bhatt KA, Liberman MC, Nadol JB. Morphometric analysis of age-related changes in the human basilar membrane. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110: 1147-53
  10. Davis AC, Ostri B, Parving A. Longitudinal study of hearing. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1990; 476: 12-22
  11. Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Healy MP. Central presbycusis. Laryngoscope 1985; 95: 128-36
  12. Seidman MD. Effects of dietary restriction and antioxidants on presbyacusis. Laryngoscope 2000 May; 110: 727-38
  13. Mazelova M, Mazelova J, Popelar J, Syka J. Auditory function in presbycusis: peripheral vs. central changes. Exp Gerontol 2003; 38: 87-94
  14. Quaranta A, Sallustio V, Scaringi A. Cochlear function and speech recognition in the elderly. Audiology 2001; 40: 301-7
  15. Bonfils P, Bertrand Y, Uziel A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbycusis. Audiology 1988; 27: 27-35
  16. Bertoli S, Probst R. The role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the evaluation of elderly persons. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 286-93
  17. Quaranta N, Debole S, Di Girolamo S. Effect of ageing on otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression in humans. Audiology 2001; 40: 308-12
  18. Oeken J, Lenk A, Bootz F.Influence of age and presbyacusis on DPOAE. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120: 396-403
  19. Dorn PA, Piskorski P, Keefe DH, Neely ST, Gorga MP. On the existence of an age threshold frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 964-71
  20. Strouse AL, Ochs MT, Hall JW 3rd. Evidence against the influence of aging on dist