Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS DURING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY ABSTRACT

ENDOSKOPİK RETROGRAD KOLANJİOPANKREATOGRAFİ UYGULANAN GERİATRİK HASTALARDA ANESTEZİ DENEYİMLERİMİZİN RETROSPEKTİF İNCELENMESİ

Pages
225–230
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Geriatric patients account for majorityof the patient population undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.However, because elderly patients are more sensitive to the negative effects of anestheticdrugs, taking appropriate measures for performing sedation and analgesia during EndoscopicRetrograde Cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients is critical.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: With the advancement in healthcare, the proportion of elderlypopulation is increasing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to retrospectively investigate intensive care admission,complications, and mortality rates in elderly patients who underwent Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography.Materials and Method: We retrospectively analyzed 1320 patients aged ≥65 years whounderwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography under sedation in our hospitalbetween October 1, 2013 and October 1, 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Geriatric patients account for majorityof the patient population undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.However, because elderly patients are more sensitive to the negative effects of anestheticdrugs, taking appropriate measures for performing sedation and analgesia during EndoscopicRetrograde Cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients is critical.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: With the advancement in healthcare, the proportion of elderlypopulation is increasing. We aimed to retrospectively investigate intensive care admission,complications, and mortality rates in elderly patients who underwent Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography.Materials and Method: We retrospectively analyzed 1320 patients aged ≥65 years whounderwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography under sedation in our hospitalbetween October 1, 2013 and October 1, 2016. Patients were divided into two groups basedon their age: group 1 (65–79 years) and 2 (≥80 years). Data on patient gender, American Societyof Anesthesiologists (ASA) distribution, early mortality (7 days), postoperative intensive careneeds, doses of anesthetic drugs administered, and complications were compared.Results: Comparison of data between groups 1 (926 patients) and 2 (394 patients)revealed that the use of propofol and ketamine was significantly lower in group 2 than ingroup 1, whereas that of midazolam was similar in both the groups. The number of patientswith complications, those requiring intubation, rate of intensive care need, and mortality weresignificantly higher in group 2 than in group 1; there were no significant differences in the typeof complications (cardiac or respiratory) (p=0.198).Conclusion: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography is a painful and stressfulprocedure that usually requires analgesia or sedation. Geriatric patients account for majorityof the patient population undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.However, because elderly patients are more sensitive to the negative effects of anestheticdrugs, taking appropriate measures for performing sedation and analgesia during EndoscopicRetrograde Cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients is critical.

Özet

Giriş: Gelişen sağlık standartları sayesinde dünya nüfusu giderek yaşlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı sedasyon altında Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiopankreatografi uygulanan yaşlı hastaların yoğun bakıma giriş, komplikasyonlar ve mortalite açısından retrospektif olarak incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda 01.10.2013 ve 01.10.2016 arasında hastanemizin Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiopankreatografi ünitesinde sedasyon altında uygulama yapılan 65 yaş üzeri hastaların bilgisayar kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Bu hastalarda kendi içinde 65-79 (Grup 1) yaş arası olanlar ve 80 yaş ve üzeriler (Grup 2) olarak iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Bu hastaların cinsiyetleri, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) dağılımları, erken dönem mortalite (7gün), post operatif yoğun bakım ihtiyacı, kullanılan anestezik ilaç dozları ve komplikasyonlar karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Altmış beş yaş ve üzeri 1320 hastanın verilerine ulaşıldı, bunlardan 926’sı 65-80 yaş arasında (Grup 1) iken, 394 tanesi 80 yaş ve üzeriydi (Grup 2). Propofol, ketamin kullanımları Grup 2’de anlamlı olarak düşükken midazolam kullanımı her iki grupta benzerdi. Komplikasyon gelişen, entubasyon gereken hasta sayısı, yoğun bakıma çıkış ve mortalite hızı Grup 2’de anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Gelişen komplikasyonların cinsi (kardiyak, solunumsal, diğer) açısından gruplar arasında farklılık gözlenmedi (p=0.198). Sonuç: Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiopankreatografi işlemi ağrılı ve stresli bir prosedür olmasından dolayı çoğunlukla analjezi veya sedasyon ihtiyacı olmaktadır. Geriatrik hasta grupları endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankreatografi uygulanan hasta popülasyonunda da önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Ancak bu hastalar anestezik ilaçların olumsuz etkilerine karşı daha duyarlı oldukları için ve bu işlem genellikle ameliyathane günübirlik uygulandığı için yaşlı hastalarda Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiopankreatografi sırasında sedasyon ve analjezi uygulaması dikkat ve önem arz etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARITAŞ, T. B., YÜKSEK, A., SIVACI, R., BAKİ, E. D., BEZEN, B. A. (2022). RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS DURING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY ABSTRACT. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 225–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/624140

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Wan He, Goodkind D, Kowal P. International Population Reports, An Aging World: 2015,
  2. U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington 2016, pp 11-2. [Internet] Available from:https:// www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/ library/publications/2016/demo/p95-16-1.pdf. Accessed:01.08.2017.
  3. Cohen S, Bacon BR, Berlin JA, et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14-16, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56 (6):803-9. (PMID:12447289). Aurini L, White PF. Anesthesia for the elderly outpatient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2014;27(6):563- 75. (PMID:25318569). Melloni C. Morbidity and mortality related to anesthesia outside the operating room. Anestesiol 2005;71(6):325-34. (PMID:15886596). Inadomi JM. Editorial: endoscopic sedation: who, which, when? Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112(2):303-5. (PMID:28154379). İyilikçi L, Çakmak Ş, Ögdül E, et al. Remote location anesthesia: Experience of our team. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2006;34(3):169-76.
  4. Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Geriatric anesthesia. Morgan & Michails Clinical Anesthesiology. 5th edition, Lange, Mc Graw Hill, USA 2013, pp 907-15.
  5. Çakar KS, Denker ÇE. Geriatric anesthesia. J Surg Med Sci 2006;2(6):126-36.
  6. Andolfatto G, Abu-Laban RB, Zed PJ, et al. Ketaminepropofol combination (ketofol) versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized double-blind trial. Ann Emerg Med 2012;59(6):504-12. (PMID:22401952).
  7. Mustafaeva MN, Mizikov VM, Kochneva ZV. Drug sedation during digestive tract endoscopy: current trends. Anesteziol Reanimatol 2009;(4):32-8. (PMID:19824413). Kulkarni S, Harsoor S, Chandrasekar M, et al. Consensus statement on anaesthesia for day care surgeries. Indian J Anaesth 2017;61(2):110-24. (PMID:28250479). ASA, Statement on nonoperating room anesthetizing locations committee of origin: Standards and practice parameters 2013, pp 1-2. [Internet] Available from: http://www.asahq.org/~/media/Sites/ASAHQ/Files/ Public/Resources/standards-guidelines/statementon-nonoperating-room-anesthetizing-locations.pdf. Accessed: 01.08.2017.