Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

İleri yaş hastalarda sevofluran ve propofol–remifentanil anestezisinin derlenme özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması

A comparıson of recovery characterıstıcs of sevoflurane and propofol–remıfentanıl anesthesıa ın gerıatrıc patıents

Pages
208–213
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications and VAS score (p>0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study we aimed to compare the recovery characteristics of propofol/remifentanil and sevofluran/remifentanil anesthesia in 100 geriatric patients undergoing urological procedures.Materials and Method: The patients were randomized to receive either propofol-remifentanil (group P) or sevoflurane-remifentanil (Group S) anesthesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Recovery characteristics, the time to post-anesthetic discharge scoring system (PADSS) score and Aldrete score of 9 point, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Trieger Dot Test (TDT)values were compared between two groups.Results: Extubation time was significantly shorter in group P than in group S (5.3±2.9 min vs 7.8±3.8 min, p=0.038).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications and VAS score (p>0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: In this study we aimed to compare the recovery characteristics of propofol/remifentanil and sevofluran/remifentanil anesthesia in 100 geriatric patients undergoing urological procedures.Materials and Method: The patients were randomized to receive either propofol-remifentanil (group P) or sevoflurane-remifentanil (Group S) anesthesia. Recovery characteristics, the time to post-anesthetic discharge scoring system (PADSS) score and Aldrete score of 9 point, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Trieger Dot Test (TDT)values were compared between two groups.Results: Extubation time was significantly shorter in group P than in group S (5.3±2.9 min vs 7.8±3.8 min, p=0.038). The times of first eye opening, response to verbal commands and orientation were similar in both groups. The time of Aldrete score of 9 points (grup P: 14.2±3.6 min, group S: 16.3±4.5 min) and PADSS of 9 points (group P: 19.3±5.7 min, group S: 22.1±4.2 min) were also similar (p>0.05). Time to return to the normal value of DSST was significantly shorter in Group P compared with Group S, and TDT was similar in both groups (p>0.05). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications and VAS score (p>0.05).

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmada ürolojik cerrahi girişim geçirecek 100 ileri yaş hastada propofol-remifentanil kullanılarak uygulanan total intravenöz anestezi ile sevofluran-remifentanil anestezisinin derlenme özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastalar propofol-remifentanil (grup P) veya sevofluran-remifentanil (grup S) anestezisi verilmek üzere rasgele ayrıldı. Derlenme özellikleri, anestezi sonrası gönderme skor sistemi (PADSS) ve Aldrete derlenme skorunu 9 olma zamanı, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Trieger Dot Test sonuçları kaydedildi.Bulgular: Ekstubasyon zamanı grup P'de grup S'e göre belirgin olarak kısa bulundu (5.3±2.9 dk ve 7.8±3.8dk, p=0.038). İlk göz açma, verbal uyarılara cevap ve oryantasyon gruplar arasında benzerdi. Aldrete skorunun 9 olma zamanı (Grup P: 14.2±3.6 dk, Grup S: 16.3±4.5 dk)ve PADSS'in 9 olma zamanı (Grup P: 19.3±5.7 dk, Grup S: 22.1±4.2 dk) iki grupta benzer bulundu (p>0.05). DSST'in normale dönmesi grup P'de grup S ile karşılaştırıldığınd belirgin olarak hızlı idi (p0.05). Bulantı/kusma, titreme, göğüs duvarında sertlik ve VAS ağrı skoru değerlerinde belirgin fark yoktu (p>0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, İ., ÇELİK, J. B., GÜVEN, S., EROL, A., TOPAL, A. (2022). İleri yaş hastalarda sevofluran ve propofol–remifentanil anestezisinin derlenme özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 208–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/624053

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Loop T, Priebe HJ. Recovery after anesthesia with remifentanil combined with propofol, desflurane, or sevoflurane for otolaryn-geal surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:123-9
  2. Arar C, Kaya G, Karamanlıoğlu B, Pamukçu Z, Turan N. Effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane and propofol infusions on post-operative recovery criteria in geriatric patients. J Int Med Res 2005;33:55-60
  3. Schmidt J, Fechner J, Fritsch B, et al. Propofol-remifentanil versus sevoflurane-remifentanil for anesthesia for pediatric pro-cedures in infants, children andadolescents. Anaesthetist 2001;50:757-66
  4. Philip BK, allar SK, Bogetz MS. A multicenter comparison of maintenance and recovery with sevoflurane or isoflurane for adult ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1996;83:314-9
  5. Doze VA, Westphal LM, White PF. Comparison of propofol with metohexital for ourpatient anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1986;65:1189-95
  6. Smith I, Ding Y, White PF. Comparison of induction, mainte-nance, and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane- N2O and ropofol-sevoflurane-N2O with propofol-isoflurane-N 2O anes-thesia. Anesth Analg 1992;74:253-9
  7. Larsen B, Seitz A, Larsen R. Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: a comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2000;90:168-74
  8. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A post anaesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970;49:924-34
  9. Chung F, Chan VWS, Ong D. A post anesthetic discharge scor-ing system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:500-6
  10. Lerman J, Davis PJ, Welborn LG, et al. Induction, recovery, and safety characteristics of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory surgery: a comparison with halothane. Anesthesiology 1996;84:1332-40
  11. Wilhelm W, Kuster M, Larsen B, et al. Desflurane and sevoflu-rane: a comparison of emergence times and haemodynamic dur-ing surgical procedures. Anaesthesist 1996;45:37-46
  12. Tsai SK, Lee C, Kwan WF, Chen BJ. Recovery of cognitive functions after anaesthesia with desflurane or isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:255-8
  13. Naidu-Sjösvard K, Sjöberg F, Gupta A. Anaesthesia for video-artroscopy of the knee: a comparison between desflurane and sevoflurane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:464-71
  14. Welborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, et al. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflu-rane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:917-20
  15. Wilhelm W, Huppert A, Brün